Farfenugen
Well-Known Member
I am my own god. There, that's all I have to say
...religions talk about people who embodied energies. Every person has their own amount, or type of, energy. The question religion poses is "how are you going to use that energy?" It's a valid one, as far as I can tell. How we use it dictates the state of our world. The people we've read about have emptied the egoic self and filled up on truth.No one is trying to prove anything. The piece just draws attention to the fact that there's no evidence to back up Christianity's most grandiose claims. It's important to do that because the Christians keep trying to pass their claims off as fact.
What if you are wrong?. Besides, there isn't supposed to be any evidence...the entire religion(and I use that term very loosely)is based upon faith. And if that's the case, then it's a relationship as opposed to a religion.No one is trying to prove anything. The piece just draws attention to the fact that there's no evidence to back up Christianity's most grandiose claims. It's important to do that because the Christians keep trying to pass their claims off as fact.
what is this energy , you talk of ? how do you measure it , or how do you even know it exists ? how do i know the 'amount' of energy i have ? if you know that everyone has different amounts of this 'energy , then it must be measurable , so how are you measuring this ?
...religions talk about people who embodied energies. Every person has their own amount, or type of, energy. The question religion poses is "how are you going to use that energy?" It's a valid one, as far as I can tell. How we use it dictates the state of our world. The people we've read about have emptied the egoic self and filled up on truth.
ex:
In Buddhism, a bodhisattva (Sanskrit: बोधिसत्त्व bodhisattva; Pali: बोधिसत्त bodhisatta) is either an enlightened (bodhi) existence (sattva) or an enlightenment-being or, given the variant Sanskrit spelling satva rather than sattva, "heroic-minded one (satva) for enlightenment (bodhi)." The Pali term has sometimes been translated as "wisdom-being,"[SUP][1][/SUP] although in modern publications, and especially in tantric works, this is more commonly reserved for the term jñānasattva ("awareness-being"; Tib. ཡེ་ཤེས་སེམས་དཔའ་་, Wyl. ye shes sems dpa’. Traditionally, a bodhisattva is anyone who, motivated by great compassion, has generated bodhicitta, which is a spontaneous wish to attain Buddhahood for the benefit of all sentient beings.[SUP][2]
...the quote above also describes a shaman, one who is "between heaven and earth - a mediator".[/SUP]
...we can tell who has a lot of energy and who hasn't. I'm sure you've seen people before who had a hard time keeping still. Mostly, that energy is creative energy, which is sexual energy. Portrayed as a negative you could say it is anxiety, even neurosis. How is it measured? The person who experiences it is the measure. You decide what has more of this 'spirit' by the choices you make. It's not like you can say that you're happily attracted to bad times. Isn't everyone searching for 'The Good'? "The Good" is not quantifiable even by those who have it in a material way.what is this energy , you talk of ? how do you measure it , or how do you even know it exists ? how do i know the 'amount' of energy i have ? if you know that everyone has different amounts of this 'energy , then it must be measurable , so how are you measuring this ?
i could make up my own invisible force wich we all hold and say the exact same thing as you have just wrote about it....we can tell who has a lot of energy and who hasn't. I'm sure you've seen people before who had a hard time keeping still. Mostly, that energy is creative energy, which is sexual energy. Portrayed as a negative you could say it is anxiety, even neurosis. How is it measured? The person who experiences it is the measure. You decide what has more of this 'spirit' by the choices you make. It's not like you can say that you're happily attracted to bad times. Isn't everyone searching for 'The Good'? "The Good" is not quantifiable even by those who have it in a material way.
So there, describe the wind for me in a tangible sense
i could make up my own invisible force wich we all hold and say the exact same thing as you have just wrote about it.
lol..................................I am my own god. There, that's all I have to say
Wrong about there not being any known evidence to support Christianity's most grandiose claims? I'm afraid that's fact.What if you are wrong?. Besides, there isn't supposed to be any evidence...the entire religion(and I use that term very loosely)is based upon faith. And if that's the case, then it's a relationship as opposed to a religion.
There's nothing wrong with that as long as you don't imply that people who don't believe that are screwed up.I am my own god. There, that's all I have to say
Terrible argument. You have just restated Pascal's Wager, not an argument for the existence of god, an argument for BELIEF in the existence of a specific deity. One that would have to reward mere belief, even belief for dishonest reasons such as wagering on his existence.I would rather live my life as if there is a god and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is.
you silly boy .I would rather live my life as if there is a god and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is.
This is the mentality shared by many. The fear of an eternity in a firey hell allow the chruches to have shitloads of money and power. My hat has always gone off to the geniuses who invented the idea of heaven and hell.I would rather live my life as if there is a god and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is.
envy is an emotion not a force ....I wonder who here can paint a great picture of 'forces'. It's easy to say that either one thing or the other exists or not. Since it's been done a bazillion times, let's get to something different and start creating mental images of what 'unseen' forces are.
Don't paint the outcomes, which is what we do with our intellects. Instead, give great descriptions of the motivators.
Love, hate, vanity, pride, etc. "What is envy?", can you show me what envy itself looks like? Not the outcome of envy, but envy itself - do so without using a person as an example. It's not easy.
That would make me ignorant if there was evidence for what you believe. But that's what the problem is. There is no evidence to support Christianity's most grandiose claims.And you are right it does not matter what the Author believes happens after death. It also does not matter what I believe or you, or Osama Bin Laden's commorades. But suppose I am wrong about my beliefs, wha have I lost in believing them? If I am right what have you gained in not believing? Just sayin'