I timer is a lot cheaper than electricity. lol. If 24/0 works as good, then I would def. go with 18/6.Bump for 24/7. <3
When indoors simplicity is best. When indoors & we supplement co2, that is not what a plant normally gets in the wild.. so, sometimes.. more is better.
I talk to my plants and appologize for keeping them up so long but I am sure they forgive me with the TLC I provide. When people argue the "Well in nature the plant gets sleep" I say.. Well in nature the plant does not get 1500ppm of co2.. or a dehumidifier ..or a umbrella to block the rain. Does not cut it, I used to be all about 18/6 until I realized 24/0 works just as well IF not better.. & no timers needed. so simplicity wins.
I've done what you're about to do. Cuttings taken from the same plant, same nute schedule, same medium, etc. The only variable was one group was under 24/0 for veg, and the other 18/6. The plants that were grown under 24/0 were simply more vigorous. More leaves, tighter node spacing, less stretch.Mark from Aviditi already responded and said that he is personally fixing the labeling and offered me another tent. Pretty cool.
As far as experts not disagreeing on light schedule, that is ridiculous. I have several grow books, they all say different shit and i went in circles. lol. That is exactly why I am setting up two small tents in my office just to do side by side experiments. I am worried about end result - smell taste yield, etc. I don't give a shit if my plant looks a little bigger at three weeks, lol. I care about end result. I personally don't think it makes that big of a difference. that is why people keep arguing it. lol.
I have no issues at all, you think you're the only one here with any experience or something? Sorry, if you guys don't see a difference in plant growth between 18/6 and 24/0 then I'd have to say you are the inexperienced. But whatever.. I don't have the time to debate about it.. Try it sometime and come to your own conclusions.stretchy plants...ahhhh? so you have issues within your grow area, completely unrelated to the 24 or 18 hr lite schedule. Please get familiar with the agricultural standards Leibligs Law.......stretchy plants=18/6 lite schedule????wtf?
The "dark cycle" does not only occur at night, it simply does not require light. The "dark reactions" are more accurately known as "light-independent reactions". This is a commonly misunderstood aspect of botany.
Light-independent reactions occur 24 hours a day as they do not require light. They happen regardless. This is the most common reason people find to argue for plants needing "sleep", its just fallacious. What I'm not saying though is that the sleep crowd are necessarily wrong, just that they are in no way right due to the "dark cycle" theory.So you just said that 24/7 is too much lights on time. That the plants will adapt to it and still have their "dark reaction" in the light. Are they useing the light in that period? No so its a waste in my opinion.
Edit) also what you are saying it that this "dark reaction" is so critical to plants that they will perform it in the light. That is very telling it says that they cannot survive without it. It's just like nutes too much is not allways better. Spoil a child their whole life and see how they do when they need to survive on their own.