Why you take my comment as trying to start an argument? I'm just sparking a little debate...smoke a bowl and try to have a conversation, why can't we share our different views and try to come to a agreed upon conclusion? Now that we have that aside...let's see if you can respond with out sounding like such a know it all this time.
What else exactly is in my Iso? Can you post a link that shows the distillates or contaminants in the Iso? If there were contaminants wouldn't their be some kind of residue left behind after all the alcohol has evaporated? Just a thought.
Can you explain this? 99% will dissolve the cannabinoids quicker because more alcohol is coming in contact with the marijuana. Like you said 91% has 9% water, so that water will slow down the process, will it not?
What was the point of this last paragraph? Where did I try to sound superior to you? Where did I try to start an argument?? Please highlight or quote it because I can't find it. Try to have a conversation...it's not that difficult.
OK, I think we got off on the wrong foot here man. I read "where do you get that", and I suppose I took it the wrong way, and that carried through while I read the rest of your response.
What I was trying to get at, without going into unnescessary detail, was that the 90% ISO will extract THC just fine, but it's still only the actual alcohol doing the work. That's why I said it's not actually faster. I was referring to the solvent doing it's job, not the remaining 10%. Hence my recommendation to use 99%. The PROCESS will be faster, you are right, it's just that I was trying (quite poorly I guess) to illustrate that the ISO in the 90% is just as effective, it's the remaining 10% that slows shit down.
As far as pollutants go, again, I think I must have explained myself poorly. Even water is a pollutant in ISO. Really, anything at all that is in a solvent other than the actual solvent, is a pollutant. And even in the cleanest water, there are still going to be a small amount of other dissolved particles. No link, just reality. Ain't nothin that's perfectly "clean" unless you're splittin atoms!
Hope this is more clear. I guess I should have explained that I wasn't going into heavy detail. Kinda came across as a prick there. Sorry bout that.