Hi PD,
Glad to see that chrome series apparently working out for you.
What's your feeling on the coverage of your unit? This is one of the double-lens ('X2-lens') units, correct?
From this picture:
My initial sense is that, since there appears to be a marked,
visible difference between the very center illumination and the periphery (moreso than with just a single lens, which will show the dropoff using a light meter, but the visible distinction between zones is not so apparent), the lighting distribution on your unit looks to be more uneven (than with one lens) - i.e. skewed for a small (high-radiance) center coverage, and more marginal at the edge.
Is this accurate, and what's your experience been like?
----
When I looked at the (single module) HGL 21X-Pro, their double lens coverage as stated (roughly a 12" diameter circle, at a height of 12" above the canopy) indicates a
usable angle of
closer to 30°, and not anywhere near 90. If you've got a miniature, single cola plant,
maybe it'd be kind of useful - but if you wanted consistent coverage to the edge, too, it's probably not the light for you.
Plus, one can only grow so much biomass using
any level of illumination within a particular area, so creating an uneven coverage like that...doesn't seem very efficient, esp. in something like a ScrOG, which benefits from consistent, even coverage, vs. growing 'trees'. These seem more suited to growing (1-2) taller plants, rather than wide plants or beds/SOG/ScrOG.
This, in addition to the additional refractive losses one would incur from an additional lens, is why I'm not all that keen on trying to further concentrate/attenuate light from the emitters in that manner.
What are your thoughts so far, after having used it (i.e. the 4-module, 15 LED, double lens Apollo)? This is just above the two plants for now, correct? Thx mate!
Cheers,
-TL