Apollo Series LED panels from Cidly

I spoke with Sing, and we was nice enough to give me a growers discount and talked on Skype for a half hour.
Hey Mike...what does that mean? Will he be cutting the price to you in exchange for running a journal here? How much is the discount?


I know this sounds crazy but i am considering doing an apollo 6 or 8 in white 2700. am i crazy?
Well...you may still be crazy sf, :bigjoint: but your plan might indeed work out fairly well. One caveat:

Did they send you the spec sheets for the 2700k whites? If so, can you post 'em? Thx!

The spectrum on an all-2700k white panel is actually a bit better than your standard HPS
(and has a bit more blue vs HPS, too); the only problem may be efficiency.

(An all ~3000-3500k generally has slightly better efficiency, and some more usable blue (+Y/G), too, vs. the 2700k's.)

The cool whites that Psy posted earlier only show 84.9 lumens/watt @700mA...and that's before derating due to junction temperature (Tj).

----

I don't have the Epi warm white datasheets at my fingertips, but if they're anything like the HPLighting-packaged SemiLEDs (which also run @3.8V @700mA), then you're only talking about ~50-55 lumens/watt, if that.

Note that their VF is also pretty poor, to be honest. If you had a decent high-bin CREE WW, for example, you could expect nearly double the lumens at operating current. That's due to both a more efficient blue, and more efficient phosphors, as well as lower voltages at operating current.

Being able to run half the watts for the same amount of light...sounds like a deal to me - even if they cost a bit more.

(I'll also note that the packaging/final assembler...makes a difference. For examply, the HPL-H44 whites run @3.8V @ 700mA, while the SibDI P20 whites only use 3.5V. Both are subsidiaries of SemiLED, supposedly using the same chips.)

And this...

How do these compare to the e.shines? Both seem very reasonable for prefab units. I would love to clone a Evo grow light and do 6:3 660nm and 10000k white.
...is why I wouldn't be interested in the knockoff EVOs, unless they could guarantee you'll be using actual CREEs in them. The fixture design may be useful, but if the emitters aren't up to snuff, not much you can do about it.

(Note that at least one of e.shine's aquarium lights is supposed to be using 'CREEs' - so they may, in fact, be available - for a price)

Sure, there's a low-, mid-, and high- range with any product line, but using Epi's in them...wouldn't be my first choice. If you can at least get SEMIs instead, you'll improve your efficiency a bit, for not much price difference, I believe.

As far as getting a quote. Mr Sing, clearly uses a service to field basic questions.
He uses a 3rd-party translation intermediary for English-Mandarin and back? Interesting.

Each orb will only have 12 leds not 15 due to them all being white.
This makes sense, given the high voltage requirements of the series, if they're sticking to ~45V max drivers per module. 3.8V x 12 = ~45.6V per string.

I exchanged emails directly with e-shine rep about their gen4 'nano' technology... cool stuff! but ultimately I didn't find the design I was looking for, and the cost was higher.
I like the look of the E-Shine CREE Classic (link), with their two-channel dimmer controls. A couple of those would fit over a small (4-6 plant) Rubbermaid tote hydroponic (DWC) ScrOG grow pretty well, for instance.

Only question is whether they use actual CREEs, or knock-offs. Change out the Blue for Red, maybe get 6500K whites (or not, if you want a higher blue peak), and you've got an adjustable grow light that could run several types of strains pretty well.

Figure ~40w max per light (whites up to 700mA (@3.4V), reds up to 600mA (slightly under 2.3V) - though that's perhaps stretching it a bit), and you're in business.

The Apollo 12 is built with 6 fans (input Voltage 12V and input Current 0.25A at each one)
So it's 3w per fan, then. Thanks!


I have just re-calculated your spectrum, 11 pcs Red and Orange LEDs, 4 pcs Blue and White LEDs:
3 Red 660nm
3 Red 650-670nm
2 Red 630-640nm
2 Red 620-630nm
1 Orange 610-615nm
2 Blue 450-470nm
1 Blue 420-430nm
1 White 6000K
Hey Psy, can you talk a bit about why you're planning to break up the reds by specific chromaticity like that (so, they can be that exact in their binning, too? Good to know.), rather than just use 630 and/or 660, and a few neutral whites perhaps? A couple of NW will allow you to ditch the orange and 10nm-step-difference Reds completely. Curious as to your methodology.

To consider a long lasting and safe performance, i would recommend to reduce 0.1V in the Red LEDs, build them as 2.6V Input voltage.
11x2.6+4x3.8=43.8V.

If so, you have to sacrifice 11x12x0.1x0.7=9.24W in the Apollo 12. But for a prolonged lifespan, i think it is worthy doing so.


Well, I agree with this, and was impressed with this level of customer care in dealing with my panel customization. The fact that Mr. Lee addressed this with me honestly before building the panels says a lot to me... Just figured I would share...
Yes, burning out the modules sooner would mean higher return rates/cost for the manufacturer, so at least they're looking out for you, too.

Did he say exactly how they would be reducing the VF? In other words - does he have access to lower-VF bins, and he will substitute those, yet run it at the same mA? Or, will he simply lower the constant current to the whole string, so the emitters will naturally draw fewer volts? Wasn't clear on what you mean.

Either way, good to know you feel they are responding to your questions, and promptly.


Cheers,

-TL
 

jubiare

Active Member
yEAH I think what he (Mr Cidly) meant was employing 700Ma drivers instead of 730Ma or something like that, that's my assumption
 

ChrisGGG

Member
@ The Lurker

I just meant clone the EVO in the sense of using just 10000k and 660nm not the higher quality leds. That link to e.shine was pretty cool. How can we be sure they are using real Crees? I would use a less efficient led if it cost 1/5 and was 2/3 the efficiency, but I guess that's the problem with knock-offs you can't trust the spec sheets.
 

squarefodder

Active Member
Well...you may still be crazy sf, :bigjoint: but your plan might indeed work out fairly well. One caveat:

Did they send you the spec sheets for the 2700k whites? If so, can you post 'em? Thx!

The spectrum on an all-2700k white panel is actually a bit better than your standard HPS
(and has a bit more blue vs HPS, too); the only problem may be efficiency.

(An all ~3000-3500k generally has slightly better efficiency, and some more usable blue (+Y/G), too, vs. the 2700k's.)

The cool whites that Psy posted earlier only show 84.9 lumens/watt @700mA...and that's before derating due to junction temperature (Tj).

----

I don't have the Epi warm white datasheets at my fingertips, but if they're anything like the HPLighting-packaged SemiLEDs (which also run @3.8V @700mA), then you're only talking about ~50-55 lumens/watt, if that.

Note that their VF is also pretty poor, to be honest. If you had a decent high-bin CREE WW, for example, you could expect nearly double the lumens at operating current. That's due to both a more efficient blue, and more efficient phosphors, as well as lower voltages at operating current.

Being able to run half the watts for the same amount of light...sounds like a deal to me - even if they cost a bit more.

(I'll also note that the packaging/final assembler...makes a difference. For examply, the HPL-H44 whites run @3.8V @ 700mA, while the SibDI P20 whites only use 3.5V. Both are subsidiaries of SemiLED, supposedly using the same chips.)


-TL
Iwill ask for the exact specs.

I did go back and see where Psy posted the cool white @ 84.9 lumens per watt. So an apollo unit drawing around 200w would mean 16980 lumens correct? Maybe not because not all wattage is going to the led.
 

Psytranceorgy

Well-Known Member
Did he say exactly how they would be reducing the VF? In other words - does he have access to lower-VF bins, and he will substitute those, yet run it at the same mA? Or, will he simply lower the constant current to the whole string, so the emitters will naturally draw fewer volts? Wasn't clear on what you mean.

My email to Sing Lee:

How, exactly, would you be reducing the input voltage from 2.7 to 2.6? In other words - do you have access to lower-input voltage LED bins? and you will substitute for those LEDs, yet run them at the same mA?

Or, will you simply lower the constant current to the whole string, so the emitters will naturally draw fewer volts?

I wasn't clear on what you mean...

Thanks!

Sing's reply:

Glad to receive your inquiry again.

To reduce the input Voltage of our LEDs is very easy, but this is a technique skill, cannot tell the others, just likes Cree never tells the others how they produce their LED chips.

By the way, inuput voltage and constant current are two different concepts.

Any other questions please feel free to send me email.

Have a good time.

Best Regards,

Sing

So it sounds to me like Sing is able to simply reduce the input voltage (via priprietary method) to the individual RED/ORANGE LEDs from 2.7 to 2.6... independent of input current...

Cheers!
 

wadz

Member
would i want 60/90/120 lens? im trying to learn what exactly the difference is. is it just coverage of width?
 

jubiare

Active Member
you want only a few blue and whites ideally. And you want them 120 lens, spreading the coverage.... the rest at 90 lens. Or if you want little coverage but better penetration you want the blue and whites at 90 lens and the rest at 60 lens.

I really wouldnt bother with IR and UV. Or at least dont have one each in each 15 module... that-s way too much and you sacrifice reds, budding up, for IR and UV.
 

wadz

Member
Well.. I pulled trigger last night. I went with the penetrator 84x-pro. The x2... 649 with shipping. Kinda high but they look pretty legit. 21 pod modulars. Copper core heat sinks. Hope all is well!
 

Psytranceorgy

Well-Known Member
Well.. I pulled trigger last night. I went with the penetrator 84x-pro. The x2... 649 with shipping. Kinda high but they look pretty legit. 21 pod modulars. Copper core heat sinks. Hope all is well!
cool those are nice, and should perform well for you... good luck and happy growing friend, and YES you need to start a journal on RIU when you get your grow up and running with that light! =D
 

wadz

Member
journal incoming for sure. waiting to start next batch for subcool's soil mix. NLG will be selling it for first time 4/20 at salem location and beaverton i think. will be running TGA "the Flav" and "void" gonna try to get a male spacebomb to cross them. if the spacebomb comes out female shes gettin budded also f it!
 

Psytranceorgy

Well-Known Member
journal incoming for sure. waiting to start next batch for subcool's soil mix. NLG will be selling it for first time 4/20 at salem location and beaverton i think. will be running TGA "the Flav" and "void" gonna try to get a male spacebomb to cross them. if the spacebomb comes out female shes gettin budded also f it!
hells yeah looking forward to that journal =D TGA is some fire!
 

Psytranceorgy

Well-Known Member
hopefully I will be up and running with some Apollo action in June! and You.will be The_first To.Hear Peace And Nazareth Hair Of The Dawg =D
 
you want only a few blue and whites ideally. And you want them 120 lens, spreading the coverage.... the rest at 90 lens. Or if you want little coverage but better penetration you want the blue and whites at 90 lens and the rest at 60 lens.

I really wouldnt bother with IR and UV. Or at least dont have one each in each 15 module... that-s way too much and you sacrifice reds, budding up, for IR and UV.
Cidly no longer offering 30 or 60 degree angled lenses due to poor results. 120 degree secondary lenses are the most popular. I chose 90's because I'm only growing one plant under each light.
 

Psytranceorgy

Well-Known Member
on another site there is a guy claiming his lights running hotter than other models hes using right now. Maybe they are driving it harder?
can you provide the link? If it is the one I think it is, that guy doesn't even have an Apollo (are there pictures?) and wants to sell you a Magnum
 

Psytranceorgy

Well-Known Member
Cidly no longer offering 30 or 60 degree angled lenses due to poor results. 120 degree secondary lenses are the most popular. I chose 90's because I'm only growing one plant under each light.
yeah I wish Cidly would still offer 60 myself, well I guess maybe they do, but you have to buy a Blackstar Chrome from Lighthouse/Gotham? I dunno... but I am going to go all 90 and I've come to terms with it...
 

wadz

Member
The cidly hu guy refuses to admit they make the blackstar. but like you said im pretty sure they do. thats why they dont do 60 cause chrome has it. im sure its written in there contract. Also sent me email asking me to remove my apollo pictures from this website
 

wadz

Member
guy said he doesnt want his product copied... i said theres only 4-7 diff companies with same design 100% even same reveal on hangar assembly. its clearly made at same plant just branded different. if this wasnt the case i think all those patent numbers they have mean shit?
 
Top