trayvan martin

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I would never kill someone over my life's research in math or all my artwork (only options that apply to me). I doubt people would kill over a photo or a novel they've been writing either. I don't really care for material possessions all too much. You could learn a thing or two from Buddhist monks who destroy their artwork immediately after finishing it. Don't let your life be consumed by material value and you'll be a much happier person.
If stealing is "no big Deal" why do we have laws against it and incarcerate the people who do it?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
also, there was no public outcry for stand your ground laws. it is another example of lobbying by special interests. there was no epidemic of cases that stand your ground laws would have remedied.

in fact, many people have taken stand your ground laws as a license to kill, even when they are clearly not fearing for their life. for example, this guy is in his home and sees his neighbor's house getting robbed.

911 tells him several times to just stay inside his house, that there ain't no property worth killing someone over. this guy gets his shotgun, waits until the robbers leave his neighbor's house, and then runs outside and guns them down. his words are "hello! you're dead!"

[video=youtube;J-63eOPywSw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-63eOPywSw[/video]

he walked. he was never in fear for his life, he was using the law as a license to kill.

i have no problem with stand your ground laws with respect to the castle doctrine part. but if it ain't your castle, you do not get to serve as judge, jury, and executioner.

in my state, i do not have stand your ground laws. if someone comes and robs my greenhouse this fall, i have to let them unless they threaten my life, and i am OK with that. like the 911 dispatcher said, there ain't no property worth killing someone over.
Sooo, the reason you sit in wait in the back yard with a axe is because you want to learn to chop down trees? I think you have intentions of not letting people steal all your hard work is what I think.
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
you dont get it . . .do you No Drama . .. . lol NO Idea is more like it

siting on your property waiting someone to trespass is a lot different then hunting down someone not on your property and then shooting them when you get more than you bargained for
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
you dont get it . . .do you No Drama . .. . lol NO Idea is more like it

siting on your property waiting someone to trespass is a lot different then hunting down someone not on your property and then shooting them when you get more than you bargained for
I wasn't replying to your stupid non spelling ass. Buck DOES sit in his backyard at night waiting for hoodlums to steal his plants, how hypocritical do you think that is after posting what he just did?

Its you who doesn't get it sam, you are the one grasping for straws. Actually you haven't the slightest clue.
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
I wasn't replying to your stupid non spelling ass. Buck DOES sit in his backyard at night waiting for hoodlums to steal his plants, how hypocritical do you think that is after posting what he just did?

Its you who doesn't get it sam, you are the one grasping for straws. Actually you haven't the slightest clue.
my "stupid NON spelling ass" . . . your grasp of the english language is immaculate

can you read lol my point was they are different situations as buck has a reason to protect his property and Zimmerman had no reason to prey on Martin

except to assert his dubious authority . . . .. its the same as people with road rage they think the area that they are on or in is thiers . . .its not

with statements like the one quoted above and your response in post 4266 i think it is apparent who is having trouble grasping reality
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
my "stupid NON spelling ass" . . . your grasp of the english language is immaculate

can you read lol my point was they are different situations as buck has a reason to protect his property and Zimmerman had no reason to prey on Martin

except to assert his dubious authority . . . .. its the same as people with road rage they think the area that they are on or in is thiers . . .its not

with statements like the one quoted above and your response in post 4266 i think it is apparent who is having trouble grasping reality
You should read the post that Buck made, my reply will make more sense to you then, if you persist in the false argument you really leave no room for insight or discussion.
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
it was the suggestion that would have saved too people from the fate of this event

and you rationalize him not listening becuase it wasnt a command

what kind of sheep are you
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
You should read the post that Buck made, my reply will make more sense to you then, if you persist in the false argument you really leave no room for insight or discussion.
im not arguing with you im pointing out your stupidity . . .. yet again


it seems you think Zimmerman the wife beater with a record of violent outburst is someone to look up to . . . .. . no discussion on this is needed

your a fool
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
You all seem to forget that the prosecutor wouldn't have filed a 2nd degree murder charge unless the evidence supports that charge. Otherwise, she would have gone with some form of manslaughter. With all the fuck ups and delays the last thing she would do is exaggerate the findings of the evidence.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
it was the suggestion that would have saved too people from the fate of this event

and you rationalize him not listening becuase it wasnt a command

what kind of sheep are you
You haven't read every page and every post have you? No you haven't that is why you are lost in the conversation and have no idea how to get back home.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
im not arguing with you im pointing out your stupidity . . .. yet again
Sorry fella, if anyone would be labeled stupid, moron, idiot, simpleton, mentally retarded, mentally defunct ...... It would be you for not following along,you are a lost little boy crying for his mommy. Soon you will have a tantrum and get sand in your labia.
 
Top