trayvan martin

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so apparently, zimmerman is sorry for killing martin, but only because he thought martin was a little younger than him.

also, the prosecuting attorney, when asked if there was reason to believe that zimmerman's statements to the police were false, simply answered "yes".

shit is getting real here.

i'm just glad this thing went to court so we can have a full look at the facts and determine who is exactly at fault and for what. but for the prosecuting attorney to state so starkly that zimmerman was lying to the police? yeah, this could be a trial for the ages.

buckle up, folks.

and cliffey, put on your helmet.

Click to expand...
more little tidbits...

Gilbreath also said evidence does not back up parts of Zimmerman's story, such as his claim that Martin was slamming his head against a sidewalk just before he pulled out his handgun and shot the teenager.
"That is not consistent with the evidence we found," said Gilbreath, who did not provide details.
​
http://www.freep.com/article/20120420/NEWS07/120420014/Judge-in-Trayvon-Martin-case-to-decide-if-George-Zimmerman-should-be-granted-bail?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|FRONTPAGE|p
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Mindmelted said:
Yes UB we know you can belittle people.

Must make you feel real good inside.

What a pathetic little man you are(and man is used very loosely)
Click to expand...
Well gee look at what you said. Hell you are now arguing facts. Everything I said was a fact. What else can we say about you
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Mindmelted said:
Yes UB we know you can belittle people.

Must make you feel real good inside.

What a pathetic little man you are(and man is used very loosely)
Click to expand...
if you didn't say that there are no hard facts that martin was followed and killed, i wouldn't have to belittle you.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Mindmelted said:
Profiling= Not a fact

Following= Not illegal

Shot to death = should have not jumped on him
Click to expand...
so he followed someone who he had not profiled? that makes no sense.

and speaking of facts, you have zero evidence of the bolded part.

do you see why you are so worthy of belittling? we can hear your sad little mind short circuiting from over the internet.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
more little tidbits...

Gilbreath also said evidence does not back up parts of Zimmerman's story, such as his claim that Martin was slamming his head against a sidewalk just before he pulled out his handgun and shot the teenager.
"That is not consistent with the evidence we found," said Gilbreath, who did not provide details.
​
http://www.freep.com/article/20120420/NEWS07/120420014/Judge-in-Trayvon-Martin-case-to-decide-if-George-Zimmerman-should-be-granted-bail?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|FRONTPAGE|p
Click to expand...
does no one else find it interesting that the state is confident that zimmerman's story is BS and that he lied to the police?

they tipped their hand here big time. o'mara better be as good an attorney as he seems.
 
Mindmelted

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so he followed someone who he had not profiled? that makes no sense.

and speaking of facts, you have zero evidence of the bolded part.

do you see why you are so worthy of belittling? we can hear your sad little mind short circuiting from over the internet.
Click to expand...


Only your little crowd of cronies...
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
These @#$%^ always get away...What type of people ???? Tall people ??? People with skittles????? People with hoodies ???? nope Zimmerman was not profiling.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
does no one else find it interesting that the state is confident that zimmerman's story is BS and that he lied to the police?

they tipped their hand here big time. o'mara better be as good an attorney as he seems.
Click to expand...
O'mara should be looking for a plea deal
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Mindmelted said:
Profiling= Not a fact

Following= Not illegal

Shot to death = should have not jumped on him
Click to expand...
1) Uncertain.
2) true.
3) very true ... wasn't shooting him quite enough? Being on top of him afterwards (if the witness account was straight) was in questionable taste. cn
 
C

cliffey501

Active Member
UncleBuck said:
does no one else find it interesting that the state is confident that zimmerman's story is BS and that he lied to the police?

they tipped their hand here big time. o'mara better be as good an attorney as he seems.
Click to expand...
Dale Gilbreath, an investigator for the state attorney's office, testified that he does not know whether Martin or Zimmerman threw the first punch and that there is no evidence to disprove Zimmerman's contention that he was walking back to his vehicle when confronted by Martin.
​
Doesn't sound like very damning evidence.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
1) Uncertain.
2) true.
3) very true ... wasn't shooting him quite enough? Being on top of him afterwards (if the witness account was straight) was in questionable taste. cn
Click to expand...
He was profiling. When he called 911 he profiled Martin as a suspicious character who looked like he was up to no good..also that he was high or something. Now you tell me why he said these things if he is not profiling ????
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
O'mara should be looking for a plea deal
Click to expand...
they really have his balls in a salad grinder here.

risk life in prison on a case where the state has tipped its hat that they have some damning stuff in store, or take a manslaughter plea now to avoid the damning stuff later.

in any case, it looks like if it goes to trial (it appears it will based on predictions i've read), manslaughter is in the bag there as well.

that apology did not do zimmerboy any favors, to be sure. one of the worst apologies ever. ever.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cliffey501 said:
Dale Gilbreath, an investigator for the state attorney's office, testified that he does not know whether Martin or Zimmerman threw the first punch and that there is no evidence to disprove Zimmerman's contention that he was walking back to his vehicle when confronted by Martin.
​
Doesn't sound like very damning evidence.
Click to expand...

  • the prosecuting attorney, when asked if there was reason to believe that zimmerman's statements to the police were false, simply answered "yes".​


    ​


  • Gilbreath also said evidence does not back up parts of Zimmerman's story, such as his claim that Martin was slamming his head against a sidewalk just before he pulled out his handgun and shot the teenager.
    "That is not consistent with the evidence we found," said Gilbreath, who did not provide details.
    ​
    http://www.freep.com/article/2012042...CFRONTPAGE%7Cp​


    ​

 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so apparently, zimmerman is sorry for killing martin, but only because he thought martin was a little younger than him.

also, the prosecuting attorney, when asked if there was reason to believe that zimmerman's statements to the police were false, simply answered "yes".

shit is getting real here.

i'm just glad this thing went to court so we can have a full look at the facts and determine who is exactly at fault and for what. but for the prosecuting attorney to state so starkly that zimmerman was lying to the police? yeah, this could be a trial for the ages.

buckle up, folks.

and cliffey, put on your helmet.

Click to expand...
You left out another interesting fact. Z's defense attorney questioned the prosecutor's investigator and asked him if he knows who started to whole thing. The investigator's response: No.

A good judge will dismiss the murder 2 charge. There is no probably cause to arrest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top