It prohibits federal funding and taxation of many things including heterosexual institutions just as I said, One example I gave is abortion clinics, which would be a heterosexual institution. Another would be taxation of marriage, another heterosexual institution.
No he did not take credit for those specific letters or statements in particuliar which were written by Mr Rowland...friend of war lobyist. This is why you are being deceitfull, or your just a moron, this is not the question that was asked. If anything this whole newletter thing is a conspiracy by an organization who profits from war and big pharma to smear Dr Paul as I laid out.
you're going directly away from the embarrassing, discriminatory, and bigoted part of the bill.
what do we have here? a ronald worshipper espousing conspiracy theories? LOL!
and you can't fucking read or hear apparently....read the underlined part dipshit(Ron Paul NEVER admitted to writing those articles which were written by Mr Rowland and even if he did they were written by Mr Rowland so what the fuck would it matter? He admitted he publishes a newletter not that he wrote said "controversial" statements or articles). Sorry I am really not the least bit bias but you obviously are, I look at everything objectively, and question everything, and I know full well Ron Paul and his Ideolgy are not without their flaws, none of which you have ever mentioned BTW, he is not a "mesiah" to me. Everything you bring up is propaganda and dirty political smears and its very obvious. I really can't say the same about you and your feelings for Obama however, you are very bias and obviously just love anything anti-Ron Paul because its obvious you don't even look into these things, you just pop a boner immediently when you hear something negative about Ron Paul.
never said he did. he defended them as his writings though. then he said he was lying. then he blamed his campaign aides for him telling lies.
ron paul's own words are propaganda?
