I know this is a little off topic, but still has to do with Gavita...Remember that vid you posted about the rep talking about how air cooling causes you to lose lumens? This is not correct. I watched a test with air cooled/non air cooled with 2 different hoods and both times the air cooled put out more lumens. Using pyrex glass actually magnifyed the light aswell. I still got my eyes on a couple of these babies, but it makes no sense why he would blatantly lie like that. Stupid mj consumers buying into bs.
I do remember that video. Gavita has been testing in the industry for a very long time. I would
enjoy seeing your video where air cooled hood out performed the non air cooled hood. Everything
he says in the video makes sense. Also 5-8% of light loss through glass is a very agreed upon number
in the lighting manufacturing industry. And that's with clean glass, so a dirty/dusty glass hood could
dramatically reduce output. The cooling of the bulb does seem to be a more difficult sell, but I can tell
you from direct experience of cooling bulbs. I can stare, literally, stare at all 24 of my thousand watt
bulbs while they are on at the commercial warehouse. I can see the arc tube in the bulb clearly, and how it
is separately defined from the outer bulb casing. I can't even do this with my Gavita when it is set to 600 watts.
It is already too bright. It hurts my eyes and gives me a headache. This is my only personal evidence.
I'm convinced.
In my opinion, where stupid MJ consumer bought into BS is when they started buying BIGGER hoods. Ocho's, and
all the other huge hoods only create more distance for the bulb to travel before it is reflected. The claim to "spread"
the light, but really you don't need 4 feet of sheet metal to do that. A tiny reflector simply directing the light down
does the same thing. And depending on the angle of the aluminum, the hot spot should be negligible.
40 years of grow reflector manufacturing and only now do these companies begin producing bigger and bigger hoods. They
didn't make the lights more and more wattage, but they did make these giant hoods twice as expensive.. Gavita is convincing because they are upping efficiency in areas already prevalent in the grow industry, while being extremely market competitive, in terms of price / technological output. A quality 1000 watt digital ballast costs $300, at least. A quality NON oversized reflector (like a daystar AC) costs $150, and a quality bulb costs about $125-$150. That's $550-$600, I spent $600 on the gavita which is the most advanced ballast, a new style of hood, which I find to be of the HIGHEST
efficiency, and the bulb which is a 400V bulb converting to 240V through the ballast. A 400V bulb has the highest frequency
output of any grow bulb, that's a fact. And the higher the frequency, the more similarly the light resembles the sun.
Sit back and enjoy the show, I have a feeling two sunpulse halides and a Gavita Pro is a recipe for some amazing herb.