Are there ANY Christians on RIU?

skunkd0c

skunkd0c

Well-Known Member
Sean Tom said:
if you dont want it pushed on you, Christianity that is, then you dont need to be pushing Hell on Christians. It is not your place to judge for GOD is the judge of all Men and things.
Click to expand...
christians are part of one of the most putrid and vile subordinate cults
i can picture that glazed over dead look in the eyes combined with the false psychotic grin ,
the lights are on but no one is home for sure lol

i bring you wonderful news of everlasting life !!!
 
cannofbliss

cannofbliss

Well-Known Member
tyler.durden said:
Puma Punku, GW, Puma Punku. Thought I'd save the Chief the mental effort of a response...
Click to expand...

ginjawarrior said:
umma gumma :smile:
[youtube]5XhjviN1yMA[/youtube]
Click to expand...


oogahh bee dooga dee booba scooba... derp derp derpa etc... wacca wacca wacca... lol

yeah... perhaps thats more along the lines of comprehension that they seem to live by...

we must be speaking the wrong language to the religious... the language of reason...;)
 
skunkd0c

skunkd0c

Well-Known Member
cannofbliss said:
oogahh bee dooga dee booba scooba... lol

yeah... perhaps we are speaking the wrong language to the religious... ;)
Click to expand...
speaking in tongues .. nice move!
i do pity the subordinate creatures that call themselves christians
to have such a desire or compulsion to be obedient at the root of their belief system
this lack of individual courage and lack of freedom of thought demotes the christian down a few positions on the food chain imo
 
cannofbliss

cannofbliss

Well-Known Member
no... not tongues... just primitive human speech... i.e. caveman, both early early caveman... and then thousands of years later... desert caveman...

the wacca wacca wacca was just random ;)

i guess this thread has pretty much run its course, cause im pretty sure the OP has got his kicks from all of his threads' intentions...

in which the OP's thoughts were pretty much like this... "hmmm... i think ill create a thread where ill ask a question with the intent to find stupid reasons to make the "excitement of incitement" happen...

blah...blah...blah... im bored of attempting to reason with all of this crap...
 
S

spandy

Well-Known Member
Adults calling eachother names because they dont agree with what each other believes in...wow. Some of you dudes need to get a life outside of being upset that someone believes in something you dont.

I dont care what non believers think, I don't see why they care what I think. Eh, guess thats their burden to carry, fuck em.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
spandy said:
Adults calling eachother names because they dont agree with what each other believes in...wow. Some of you dudes need to get a life outside of being upset that someone believes in something you dont.

I dont care what non believers think, I don't see why they care what I think. Eh, guess thats their burden to carry, fuck em.
Click to expand...
1. If there weren't people calling themselves _________ there'd be no reason for non believers to call themselves non_________.

2. Burden of proof is on believers. Atheism is a negative stance to a question, believers are the ones making the positive claim.

Other than that, I agree with everything you said.
 
GreatwhiteNorth

GreatwhiteNorth

Global Moderator
Staff member
Padawanbater2 said:
1. If there weren't people calling themselves _________ there'd be no reason for non believers to call themselves non_________.

2. Burden of proof is on believers. Atheism is a negative stance to a question, believers are the ones making the positive claim.

Other than that, I agree with everything you said.
Click to expand...
As a Christian I don't require the burden of proof if I am not trying to convert you or push my views on you.
I believe in God.
If you don't, then that's your prerogative - honestly, it hurts my heart, but I promise not to push you towards holy water or anything else.
I respect you as a person & will treat you with dignity, but anyone whom gets offended by my personal belief's might want to consider a bit of introspection into their own views.

Here's a serious question:
Did/does your mother love you?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
GreatwhiteNorth said:
As a Christian I don't require the burden of proof if I am not trying to convert you or push my views on you.
I believe in God.
If you don't, then that's your prerogative - honestly, it hurts my heart, but I promise not to push you towards holy water or anything else.
I respect you as a person & will treat you with dignity, but anyone whom gets offended by my personal belief's might want to consider a bit of introspection into their own views.

Here's a serious question:
Did/does your mother love you?
Click to expand...
Is religious belief not a positive claim? It sounds like we're on the same page if religion is something kept personal and private.

My mother wholeheartedly loves me, I'm the favorite :)
 
rmx

rmx

Member
Buddhism is the only religion I trust. The other 500 just seem absolutely batshit insane to me. The stuff the Egyptians, Aztecs and Incans used to believe was pretty damn cool though. Gods with Jackal heads. the ferryman of the dead with a ram's head. Sign me up.

http://www.godchecker.com/

About 10,000 Gods to choose from. Take your pic. I'll stick with Gaia.
 
mindphuk

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
GreatwhiteNorth said:
Prove it scientifically.
Click to expand...
Prove what scientifically? Love is a concept developed by humans. Are you claiming conceptual ideas can be scientifically tested? We can test how the human body and brain react to what we call love. You might as well ask someone to test a picture for it's 'artfulness.'

Is god merely an ambiguous, subjective concept to you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top