scroglodyte
Well-Known Member
its abnormal for me. it may be normal for the next guy. i have bigger fish to fry, than who fucks who.
you don't need to apologize to me, i had fun. but i will point out that your apology, warranted or not, makes you a bigger man and gains you lots of respect in everyone's eyes.
not everyone is mature enough to apologize for stuff, even though like i said, i don't feel you owe anyone an apology. we're just messing around on the interwebz.
No, I'm not a homo. My views on homos are:Isn't asking the same question, over and over again, abnormal? I'm starting to wonder if you, yourself, are homosexual and that is why you need so much feedback, from us, on this topic!!!
I'm not afraid to see the truth of nature. Why are you? I didn't make these rules; I'm just not afraid to see them.One word, fear.
I never said that homosexuality is BAD. I just said that it is contrary to the current state of nature. Just like pedophelia. Homos and peds are born with their sexual desires. They didn't choose them, I know.The proponents of this argument against homosexuality haven't answered why if something is 'abnormal' it automatically becomes 'bad'.
These are all reasonable statements. Where you got into trouble with most people is when you said these linesNo, I'm not a homo. My views on homos are:
1. They have the same rights (or should) as heteros.
2. They should be treated with respect.
3. They should be allowed to marry.
4. Their natural desires (yes, I realize they are born gay, and did not choose to be gay) are COUNTER to the design (or current evolutionary state, whichever term you prefer) of nature.
5. While lesbians are really and truly OK with me, rump-ranging men make me sick (much like pedophiles). But that's just me. I realize that many reasonable people feel otherwise.
Mother nature endowed many homosexuals with healthy reproductive systems. Furthermore, following your premise, we would have to assume mother nature finds something wrong with old people or anyone who is naturally sterile. Your logic is so loose that we could use it to also assume that, since mother nature gives human cancer, she must not want humans around. Underneath all of this is the fact that empirical evidence casts serious doubt on homosexuality being simply a matter of genetics, therefore natural selection must not be the only mechanic involved and may in fact be incidental.Or more clearly, it indicates that Mother Nature senses something wrong with homosexuals to the extent that She doesn't want them to procreate.
If I am hearing you right, you are now saying something a little different than what this line would suggest. You are saying that you personally find male homosexuality as disgusting and repellent as the idea of pedophilia. That is kinda like me saying that I find the idea of eating cow tongue to be as disgusting as eating rotted roadkill. I wouldn't be saying those who eat cow tongue are abnormal, or that they would share any traits with someone who would eat roadkill.I submit that homosexuals are as much abnormal as pedophiles.
Oh yes Werner, I have considered their arguments. They are baseless. Mine are factual and in line with what can be observed in nature.