Ron Paul wins again and again and again and again (11 Wins thus far)

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Pfft, your obviously not a republican, or not a well educated one anyway, that they are all projections. Mitt Romney actual delegate count is maybe a little more that 300. You have to go through, and see which delegate have been alotted yet. It really is quite an effort to look past these, numbers that are thrown up.

Delegates for RP aren't bound to Mitt, in '08 delegates crossed the floor from mccain and voted for mitt and it was allowed. Also rule 38 still applies, and if the RNC changes the rules at the convention RP delegates will just abstain, and force an independent round of voting.
those are projections with a high level of certainty and accuracy empirically speaking.

it's all over on june 5th, but you guys will be more hopeful than ever, which i like.

it's no fun to pop a deflated balloon.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
those are projections with a high level of certainty and accuracy empirically speaking.
Once again you dont know what you are talking. They are guesses at best.

it's all over on june 5th, but you guys will be more hopeful than ever, which i like.

it's no fun to pop a deflated balloon.
It was over when we re elected Bush and then his brother in arms Obama. Big government has never been successful in the long run.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Once again you dont know what you are talking.
you accidentally a word.

they are guesses. very highly educated guesses rooted in the scientific method and empirical evidence. they can even assign certain degrees of certainty based on science, and the certainty is pretty damn high.

get ready for nominee romney. i WILL rub this in your face.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
you accidentally a word.

they are guesses. very highly educated guesses rooted in the scientific method and empirical evidence. they can even assign certain degrees of certainty based on science, and the certainty is pretty damn high.

get ready for nominee romney. i WILL rub this in your face.
lol if you didn't rub it in my face it wouldn't be you. Fair is fair, I constantly rub it in your face how many of Obamas big government policies are failures.

I don't vote to select the winner. I vote on principle.
The delegate count is not scientific or empirical. Its just people trying to "give birth" to a story. You could be correct on the outcome but I'll give you guess and not highly educated guess. remember the popular vote doesn't mean too much. It's always about delegates.

Dillinger is correct on the delegate count. ~300 to 100 in Romneys favor.

http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
lol if you didn't rub it in my face it wouldn't be you. Fair is fair, I constantly rub it in your face how many of Obamas big government policies are failures.

I don't vote to select the winner. I vote on principle.
The delegate count is not scientific or empirical. Its just people trying to "give birth" to a story. You could be correct on the outcome but I'll give you guess and not highly educated guess. remember the popular vote doesn't mean too much. It's always about delegates.

Dillinger is correct on the delegate count. ~300 to 100 in Romneys favor.

http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/
that website is a POS that slowed my computer to a freeze and is not totally up to date. it still leaves winner take all states as up in the air until the state convention. biased ronbit bullshit.

the projections are scientific and based on empirical evidence, statistics, and the like. they are generally reliable, and my scenario of 700 delegates is more than generous to the ronbots. even if romney only has 700 right now, not the ~950 or so he's projected to have, he is still virtually guaranteed to surpass 1144 with CA+NJ+UT, all winner take all states.

so yes, the straw polls do matter a whole lot. especially in winner take all states. and romney still dominates paul head to head, we saw that in virginia. so the rest of the proportional delegates will put romney well over 1144. paul will finsish with about 180 delegates as i projected months and months ago.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
that website is a POS that slowed my computer to a freeze and is not totally up to date. it still leaves winner take all states as up in the air until the state convention. biased ronbit bullshit.

the projections are scientific and based on empirical evidence, statistics, and the like. they are generally reliable, and my scenario of 700 delegates is more than generous to the ronbots. even if romney only has 700 right now, not the ~950 or so he's projected to have, he is still virtually guaranteed to surpass 1144 with CA+NJ+UT, all winner take all states.

so yes, the straw polls do matter a whole lot. especially in winner take all states. and romney still dominates paul head to head, we saw that in virginia. so the rest of the proportional delegates will put romney well over 1144. paul will finsish with about 180 delegates as i projected months and months ago.
It took me 2 seconds to get to that website after I clicked on it. Get rid of your 2001 Dell.

"At the conclusion of the state Republican convention each state will select their national delegates as well as a group of alternates. It is only after that selection process takes place that we really know how many delegates a candidate has."

Have any of your predictions panned out? Economy recover yet? How did that recovery projection work out?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It took me 2 seconds to get to that website after I clicked on it. Get rid of your 2001 Dell.

"At the conclusion of the state Republican convention each state will select their national delegates as well as a group of alternates. It is only after that selection process takes place that we really know how many delegates a candidate has."

Have any of your predictions panned out? Economy recover yet? How did that recovery projection work out?
2008 mac, actually.

and i predicted a lost decade, for the record. we're doing better than i thought we would in fall 2008.
 

deprave

New Member
Ok I really just went over the numbers finally last night at work was up all night..no exact figures for you because I left it at work but this is what I discovered...some interesting facts...take out the "predictions" based solely on straw votes and this is what you will come up with, which is essentially in line with what I figured last time:

1) If there wasn't any states left at this time it would be guaranteed to be a brokered convention..its highly likely even when they are considered.
2) Mitt Romney only has roughly 300 delegates, yes 300, and Ron Paul has around 150...still very close...
3) Around 1400 delegates can still go either way...yes fucking 1400....
4) So far we know that over 50% of Mitt Romneys delegates(at the least) are bound and plan to vote for paul LMFAO ...The gist of it is every Mitt Romney Delegate thus far is an ELITE ESTABLISHMENT CORRUPTICIAN HAH! WHY AM I NOT SUPRISED?!

So its not near as far off as the media says..big fucking lol....wow they just don't expect people to try and figure this shit out themselves..Can't blame them for that took me like 5 hours...head to the wikipedia page and count it yourself its all right there..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
there is something wrong with your computer, took me precisely 0.0026 seconds to load that page
maybe i should stop fapping at disreputable porn sites and maybe you should stop huffing glue and making delegate predictions.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
2008 mac, actually.

and i predicted a lost decade, for the record. we're doing better than i thought we would in fall 2008.
OMG you have a mac? No wonder you are broke. A mac is just a super expensive $200 PC with a stolen OS that Jobs stole from UNIX when he was CEO of NeXt, of course they renamed it OS X to fool the masses. Do you even have any software that won't cause BSD or freezes? I will give you one thing, Macs make some of the nicest looking coasters and paperweights.
 

kelly4

Well-Known Member
OMG you have a mac? No wonder you are broke. A mac is just a super expensive $200 PC with a stolen OS that Jobs stole from UNIX when he was CEO of NeXt, of course they renamed it OS X to fool the masses. Do you even have any software that won't cause BSD or freezes? I will give you one thing, Macs make some of the nicest looking coasters and paperweights.
That was funny, 10 out of 10!
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
OMG you have a mac? No wonder you are broke. A mac is just a super expensive $200 PC with a stolen OS that Jobs stole from UNIX when he was CEO of NeXt, of course they renamed it OS X to fool the masses. Do you even have any software that won't cause BSD or freezes? I will give you one thing, Macs make some of the nicest looking coasters and paperweights.
Both jobs & gates stole the original Os from xerox
 

deprave

New Member
maybe i should stop fapping at disreputable porn sites and maybe you should stop huffing glue and making delegate predictions.
Funny most the hacked sites I clean up are not porn sites, Id say most of the ones that get hacked are religious sites actually, most porn sites are pretty secure lol

Oh and celebrities websites..they always hire dumb asses to do their site.
 

deprave

New Member
OMG you have a mac? No wonder you are broke. A mac is just a super expensive $200 PC with a stolen OS that Jobs stole from UNIX when he was CEO of NeXt, of course they renamed it OS X to fool the masses. Do you even have any software that won't cause BSD or freezes? I will give you one thing, Macs make some of the nicest looking coasters and paperweights.
Actually OSX is pretty good software and doesn't crash or BSOD ever really, the problem with Apple is the first thing you said...charging you out the ass for hardware. (usually older hardware too)
 
Top