trayvan martin

B

berkman858

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
dude, take it to a gay fetish website. this is a weed growing website. untangle your panties and chill out.
Click to expand...
So, you won't admit that you are a white male and probably more racist than anyone on this site? Yeah I know your type, it's just like the priests who preach against gays but are out sucking altar boy dick every chance they get. You are basically an Uncle TOM, not Uncle Buck, he was kind of funny and acceptable. You are a piece of shit hater of your own race and you should probably be keel hauled but since we are in a civil society that won't happen.
 
B

berkman858

Well-Known Member
Uncle Ben hates white people! Everyone be careful of your whiteness. He may turn your own comments back on you in a more intelligent manner.... :sleep:
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
berkman858 said:
So, you won't admit that you are a white male and probably more racist than anyone on this site? Yeah I know your type, it's just like the priests who preach against gays but are out sucking altar boy dick every chance they get. You are basically an Uncle TOM, not Uncle Buck, he was kind of funny and acceptable. You are a piece of shit hater of your own race and you should probably be keel hauled but since we are in a civil society that won't happen.
Click to expand...
you seem bitter. follow this advice.


  • this is a weed forum, chill out and smoke some herb. Untangle your panties from your assholes and have some red wine ya fucking bitch​




 
B

berkman858

Well-Known Member
That's my new name for you. I don't want to disgrace a good name like Uncle Buck. You seem to have already done that though ...:-(
 
B

berkman858

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you seem bitter. follow this advice.


  • this is a weed forum, chill out and smoke some herb. Untangle your panties from your assholes and have some red wine ya fucking bitch​

Click to expand...
I am not bitter, I am drunk and bored and you seem like a very easy target so here I am. Enjoy while I am interested, I will move on eventually.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
berkman858 said:
I am not bitter, I am drunk and bored and you seem like a very easy target so here I am. Enjoy while I am interested, I will move on eventually.
Click to expand...
jesus man, don't be such a pussy. man up and handle your liquor.

funny how you get all gung ho about gay anal fisting once your inhibitions let down. kinda telling.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
2 perfectly good chances to ask him what he's doing there, he had no interest in doing though so he didn't.

by the time he followed him for a third time, that's stalking.
Click to expand...
So, the instance in which they formally acknowledge each other doesn't count because neither of them initiated formal contact on the first two times they came into proximity of each other? I don't think it works that way.

You've been trying to sell this "multiple following" angle for some time now and I gotta say, it doesn't fly. Zimmerman would have to quit the search and return home, then go out for another search for it to count as "multiple". Just because you lose sight of your subject or come into proximity of your subject, doesn't make the continued pursuit a new instance. Stalking in the classic definition only, not the legal definition. You're trying to jam a square peg in a round hole.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
So, the instance in which they formally acknowledge each other doesn't count because neither of them initiated formal contact on the first two times they came into proximity of each other? I don't think it works that way.

You've been trying to sell this "multiple following" angle for some time now and I gotta say, it doesn't fly. Zimmerman would have to quit the search and return home, then go out for another search for it to count as "multiple". Just because you lose sight of your subject or come into proximity of your subject, doesn't make the continued pursuit a new instance. Stalking in the classic definition only, not the legal definition. You're trying to jam a square peg in a round hole.
Click to expand...
the kid ran away from him and he went to go find him again and chase him down. that's stalking.

not to mention zimm blocked off martin's path home. fucked up shit by zimm. not legal. i can't go out and follow some people in my car and cut them off from their home, chase them down multiple times, and not get in some sort of trouble.

that goes double if i'm packing heat.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
the kid ran away from him and he went to go find him again and chase him down. that's stalking.

not to mention zimm blocked off martin's path home. fucked up shit by zimm. not legal. i can't go out and follow some people in my car and cut them off from their home, chase them down multiple times, and not get in some sort of trouble.

that goes double if i'm packing heat.
Click to expand...
I would call it continued pursuit, but we're not going to agree on this one.

All I can say is if all that is illegal as you say, this prosecutor would have charged him with all those counts. She's most likely overcharged him as it is, so I don't think she would miss the opportunity to hit him with more charges.

How did Zim intentionally (your suggestion as accidentally wouldn't matter) cut Trayvon off from his home, if he didn't know where he lived?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top