trayvan martin

Red1966

Well-Known Member
well, he was. that's a fact that you're going to have to deal with. was martin found dead with burglary tools on him? nope. just skittles and iced tea. tapes show him purchasing those items minutes before a mentally unbalanced man with a gun blocked off his path home, chased him around with his gun, and shot him. "ultimately avoidable by zimmerman". fact.
That's your "well thought out arguement", that Martin bought Skittles? So all you need to do is buy Skittles before you do something and you're innocent? I guess for you that's as "well thought out" as it's going to get.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
well, since you bring it up, physical evidence is not the only evidence taken into consideration during the course of events.

if physical evidence is what you want to go by, then zimmerman fell off his truck, hit his head, and in a blind rage shot the kid point blank... and his defense should be temporary insanity.....

the circumstances surrounding the case are just as important as the physical...
absolutely correct.

we'll be hearing about all of zimmerman's anger episodes.

like the time he assaulted a police officer.

and the time he beat up his fiancee.

and the time he chased down a motorist for no reason.

and the time he tossed a drunken lady around.

and all of his previous calls to dispatch.

no one brings up those previous calls, but they will be used against him, i assure you.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
That's your "well thought out arguement", that Martin bought Skittles? So all you need to do is buy Skittles before you do something and you're innocent? I guess for you that's as "well thought out" as it's going to get.
lol, you're so stupid.

by the way, it's spelled "argument", unfrozen caveman lawyer.

you clearly missed the counter-argument that another member was referring to. but of course, you still have the brains to litigate this case.

martin was an innocent kid doing nothing wrong that night when a vigilante with a gun chased him down. fact.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Yes, I have read one or two of those in my fifty years. In contrast to the regular news of accidental shootings of children on a regular basis it's hard to recall. Hard to imagine a million, where did that # come from?

Here's my opinion on gun control. We have plenty of laws on the books and really don't need more on either side. If you own a gun CONTROL IT. If you are unable to, the penalties should be severe. You shouldn't be able to bring a gun into a bar or be able to purchase the 2 in the same place IMHO.
Make that 2.5 million times per year. Here is one source: http://gunowners.org/sk0802.htm
 

kushforbrains

Well-Known Member
i just dont understand why he can take the law into his own hands hes neighborhood watch acting like dayday from friday after next TOP FLIGHT SECURITY OF THE WORLD CRAIG
[video=youtube;6DGg6XsYTJ8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DGg6XsYTJ8[/video]
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
absolutely correct. we'll be hearing about all of zimmerman's anger episodes. like the time he assaulted a police officer. and the time he beat up his fiancee. and the time he chased down a motorist for no reason. and the time he tossed a drunken lady around. and all of his previous calls to dispatch. no one brings up those previous calls, but they will be used against him, i assure you.
Got any evidence of these?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
All that stuff is pretty well documented, Google my friend
or better yet, just call the sanford police, talk to zimmerman's friends etc.

zimmerman had a long history of violence.

martin was an innocent kid walking home from the store.

"ultimately avoidable by zimmerman".
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
lol, you're so stupid. by the way, it's spelled "argument", unfrozen caveman lawyer. you clearly missed the counter-argument that another member was referring to. but of course, you still have the brains to litigate this case. martin was an innocent kid doing nothing wrong that night when a vigilante with a gun chased him down. fact.
I cut and pasted redivider's post. Hence, the quote marks. So your calling him the idiot. Stating "fact" at the end doesn't add any validity. You said Georgetown University was preventing your wife from getting birth control and tacked "fact" on the end. This was immediately after stating your wife was on birth control. I didn't miss any well thought out arguments, no one posted any.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
“Usually he was just a cool guy. But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When dude snapped, he snapped. He had a temper and he became a liability. One time this woman was acting a little out of control. She was drunk. George lost his cool and totally overreacted. It was weird, because he was such a cool guy, but he got all nuts. He picked her up and threw her. It was pure rage. She twisted her ankle. Everyone was flipping out.”

In January 2002, she added, Zimmerman became enraged that she had come home late. They wrestled and he threw her on the bed, smacking her, according to the newspaper.

In September 2003, Zimmerman called police and reported that another motorist spat on him, according to reports, Zimmerman followed the man in his car until the police arrived. Daniel Osmun, the other driver, told police that Zimmerman was tailgating and that he spit his gum out the window "out of frustration." Osum said that Zimmerman then pulled alongside of him, and the two argued. In a police report of the incident, Osum said “at one point, he thought Mr. Zimmerman was going to attack him."

Some of Zimmerman’s neighbors said he had a history of being overly aggressive and followed people whom he thought appeared suspicious back to their homes.
At an emergency homeowner’s association meeting on March 1, days after the killing, “one man was escorted out because he openly expressed his frustration because he had previously contacted the Sanford Police Department about Zimmerman approaching him and even coming to his home,” a resident who spoke on the condition of anonymity told HuffPost. “It was also made known that there had been several complaints about George Zimmerman and his tactics" in his neighborhood watch role.

 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I cut and pasted redivider's post. Hence, the quote marks. So your calling him the idiot. Stating "fact" at the end doesn't add any validity. You said Georgetown University was preventing your wife from getting birth control and tacked "fact" on the end. This was immediately after stating your wife was on birth control. I didn't miss any well thought out arguments, no one posted any.
none of what you said makes any sense or has any basis in truth.

if you can find where i said georgetown was preventing my wife from getting birth control, quote it for me here and i'll send you a free ounce.

you;'re foaming.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
or better yet, just call the sanford police, talk to zimmerman's friends etc. zimmerman had a long history of violence. martin was an innocent kid walking home from the store. "ultimately avoidable by zimmerman".
ultimately avoidable by either party. innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, innocent kid, nope, still don't work.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ultimately avoidable by either party.
lol. nope.

zimmerman positioned himself directly between martin and his home. martin ran away. zimmerman went looking for him, even told dispatch to just have the cops call him for his location.

"ultimately avoidable by zimmerman".
 
Top