so it's not possible that zimm grabbed martin by his hoodie to try to detain? didn't otherwise try to grab him?
I've not "implied" a thing. I've tried to be respectful of BOTH parties. I know neither, so I won't judge.
that's just LOL. i could go back through your posts and compile a list of how many times you've implied something negative about martin versus how many times you've implied something negative about zimm, or similarly how many times you've defended one or the other, but that would just make you look silly.I've not "implied" a thing. I've tried to be respectful of BOTH parties. I know neither, so I won't judge.
so this specific case, with what details we know happens to your kid, are you still going to have the same ratio of bad implications and/or defenses of each party?Do you have children Buck? Because that argument is SO WEAK!!!!!!!!! Where to begin???? If you have kids of your own, you would certainly know that virtually ANY parent will defend their children regardless of what they've done. No matter how heinous the alleged crime, no matter how glaringly apparent their guilt may be, as parents it's OUR DUTY to defend our children. There are a few exceptions to this rule, but the vast majority of parents have a hard time seeing the forest for the trees when it comes to our children. We love them unconditionally so even when they fuck up we defend them unconditionally. One day you may be a parent. When you are, you will understand this.
Even though, it doesn't mean that the article is without merit. What you are trying to do here is use the logical fallacy of Appeal to ridicule.
There would be a torn hoodie, Like I said before there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that supports Zimm attacking Martin, NONE AT ALL! ALL of the evidence supports the martin attacked zimm scenario any way you cook it.so it's not possible that zimm grabbed martin by his hoodie to try to detain? didn't otherwise try to grab him?
you have no idea what happened, but are trying to act like you do.
it is entirely possible that zimm tried to grab and detain martin, after all, these assholes were always getting away and zimm told dispatch to have the police call him for location, not meet him at a specific spot.
No way Buck will be a parent, his wife's Uterus NEEDS Daily BC pills, favorably the ones that Taxpayers foot the bill for.I've not "implied" a thing. I've tried to be respectful of BOTH parties. I know neither, so I won't judge.
Do you have children Buck? Because that argument is SO WEAK!!!!!!!!! Where to begin???? If you have kids of your own, you would certainly know that virtually ANY parent will defend their children regardless of what they've done. No matter how heinous the alleged crime, no matter how glaringly apparent their guilt may be, as parents it's OUR DUTY to defend our children. There are a few exceptions to this rule, but the vast majority of parents have a hard time seeing the forest for the trees when it comes to our children. We love them unconditionally so even when they fuck up we defend them unconditionally. One day you may be a parent. When you are, you will understand this.
is his hoodie made of paper?
she pays for her own to the tune of hundreds of dollars each year.
you have no idea what happened, but are trying to act like you do.
OMG Hundreds per year? Which costs more, your tobacco habit or her BC pills?
lol! You go ahead and compile whatever you want. I tend to favor the underdog. I also didn't weigh in on this case or this thread until it became apparent that the media's attempt to demonize the man were not simple "mistakes" but apparently deliberate. People said the same thing when I discussed the Casey Anthony case. "Doc, how can you defend that baby killer?" I never defended her, but I did show how weak the state's evidence against her was, and given that it was so, she would likely be acquitted. I actually had death threats against me! lol! Guess what? I was right!
i'm just saying that it is entirely possible that zimmerman attacked martin by trying to grab and detain him, which you have tried to rule out as a possibility because you were there and videotaped the whole thing, apparently.you have no idea what happened, but are trying to act like you do.
well, when you count the cost of her monthly premiums, it adds up to the thousands.
Argumentum ad nauseam is strong with you tonight.
But you can afford to smoke $5 a pack cigarettes?
what does my purchasing cigarettes have to do with some woman not being able to shill out hundreds for preventive medicine?
you could just say "it is entirely possible that zimmerman tried to grab martin and detain him" and be done with it.
So far as I know, there is no evidence that Z was taking any kind of drugs on that day. Do you have a link to verify that?