Is this really true about Nebraska?

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
I was heading home late last night and I had a station on the radio that did about .5 hour of music and about .25 news and .25 of an hour of ads.

Well, anyway, I heard on the news portion that Nebraska has just begun using drones to spy on farmers to make sure they are in compliance with bovine manure piles. They said that they were doing that to save money so employees won't have to be on site to verify that they did comply.

They ran that segment twice and I haven't heard a thing since.
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
The drones monitor air and water quality throughout the Midwest. Not just Nebraska. They're not "spy planes" per se. But part of their operations is to monitor toxic and hazardous waste. Things that can get into your lungs and drinking water. Funny how no one is interested in drones used throughout the U.S. by Oil Corporations in "oil and gas exploration". I thought the drones would be a conservative wet dream.


  1. It's economical
  2. One drone replaces several government jobs
  3. The drones are made in Merika
  4. You can control the drone sitting on your ass eating Cheetos (an adult video game)
  5. You can blow up the house of your bitchy mother-in-law.

I wonder why the Conservatives hate this.... It cuts government jobs, it's cheap and easy, They ain't made by no furriners. Oh wait.... O'Bama.
 

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
If your Obama signs this then he is truly just like ALL the others.

By msnbc.com staff
Airline pilots and privacy rights activists are fretting over a provision of the FAA funding bill passed by Congress that would open up the U.S. skies to drones for law enforcement and other domestic use.


The Senate late Monday passed a bill authorizing $63.4 billion for the Federal Aviation Administration over four years. The House passed the bill last week, and it now goes to President Barack Obama for his signature.


The bill also requires the FAA to provide military, commercial and privately owned drones with expanded access to U.S. airspace currently reserved for manned aircraft by Sept. 30, 2015. That means unmanned drones controlled by remote operators on the ground could be flying in the same airspace as airliners, cargo planes, business jets and private aircraft.

Such a prospect worries Lee Moak, the head of the Air Line Pilots Association, an organization representing commercial pilots. He told reporters Monday there’s currently no system that allows operators of unmanned aircraft to spot and avoid helicopters and planes, Bloomberg reported.

He said unmanned aircraft shouldn’t be allowed to fly with other traffic until it can be demonstrated that they won’t crash into other planes or the ground, according to Bloomberg.

“We have a long way to go,” Moak said.

Jay Stanley of the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project, says the FAA should be rightly concerned about “the safety effects of filling our skies with flying robots."He also says nothing in the bill addresses “very serious privacy concerns” raised by domestic drones.






“This bill would push the nation willy-nilly toward an era of aerial surveillance without any steps to protect the traditional privacy that Americans have always enjoyed and expected,” Stanley wrote on his ACLU blog.
“Congress — and to the extent possible, the FAA — need to impose some rules (such as those we proposed in our report) to protect Americans’ privacy from the inevitable invasions that this technology will otherwise lead to. We don’t want to wonder, every time we step out our front door, whether some eye in the sky is watching our every move.”
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy watchdog group, last month sued the U.S. Department of Transportation, the umbrella agency for the FAA, demanding that the FAA release details on authorized drone flights with the U.S.
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
Yes, the big scary black man is going to take all your stuff and impregnate your daughters and sell drugs to your sons... ::sigh::
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
The drones monitor air and water quality throughout the Midwest. Not just Nebraska. They're not "spy planes" per se. But part of their operations is to monitor toxic and hazardous waste. Things that can get into your lungs and drinking water. Funny how no one is interested in drones used throughout the U.S. by Oil Corporations in "oil and gas exploration". I thought the drones would be a conservative wet dream.


  1. It's economical
  2. One drone replaces several government jobs
  3. The drones are made in Merika
  4. You can control the drone sitting on your ass eating Cheetos (an adult video game)
  5. You can blow up the house of your bitchy mother-in-law.

I wonder why the Conservatives hate this.... It cuts government jobs, it's cheap and easy, They ain't made by no furriners. Oh wait.... O'Bama.
Right, one drone might replace a few government jobs, but would it not create private sector jobs for specialists to maintain, manufacturer & research improvements for the drone?
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
Right, one drone might replace a few government jobs, but would it not create private sector jobs for specialists to maintain, manufacturer & research improvements for the drone?
Thanks Ryan. I didn't even think of that. Add that to the list of conservative values. The private sector gets fed.
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
I understand air privacy is something you may want but its not something you really have any control over. Its like a woman walking naked in her front yard, she may be on her property but everyone can see whats going on.
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
I understand air privacy is something you may want but its not something you really have any control over. Its like a woman walking naked in her front yard, she may be on her property but everyone can see whats going on.
Or even in your home. Remember that couple who celebrated their empty nest by dancing around naked. The neighbors complained about the music. Cops showed up and arrested them for indecent exposure. In their own home. I think EPA drones are the least of our worries.
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
Airline pilots and privacy rights activists are fretting over a provision of the FAA funding bill passed by Congress that would open up the U.S. skies to drones for law enforcement and other domestic use.
Where I live we already have the military doing it. I don't see the what the big deal is. Guess I am just used to it, and probably why I don't grow outside.:bigjoint:
choppers go by like 4-5 times a day. I don't even want to know how many planes are flying above me :shock:. I see the radar plans a lot though.



radar plane

 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Or even in your home. Remember that couple who celebrated their empty nest by dancing around naked. The neighbors complained about the music. Cops showed up and arrested them for indecent exposure. In their own home. I think EPA drones are the least of our worries.
Haven't heard that one. it defies all common sense.
The privacy talk interests me greatly ... I would prefer all nonself (be they gov't or enterprise) agencies to require my signature for every instance of proposed overflight. but I am a grand curmudgeon. cn

<edit> Ryan ... I doubt State police services operate E-2s over our land. Typical aircraft speed enforcement iirc is still visual ... witness marks on the roadside + stopwatch ... now with videocamera acting as recording stopwatch.
 
Top