and guess who will be the Judge that presides over that hearing.....Judge Lester the same that revoke his freakin bond for being misleading and deceitful about monies he had at the time of his bond..Zimmerman fucked himself on that one.
How many times are you gonna repeat this meaningless line?
You think Lester will grant him SYG ..ok good luck
only meaningless to those who can't understand the meaning..Sucks to be you
Actually, it's nice to know the difference between someone with authority, and an operator.
When he was told to retreat they have his exact location as he had just told the operator where he was, the evidence will show him between that spot and his car. He was going back to the car and it will be proved when discovery is complete. Also note that the GF claimed she was on the phone with him yet there are no phone records in the evidence so far to support this. The whole deal is a shame, should have never happened period young man loses his life just horrible.
That's a fact. I don't know what significance some people think that has. They seem to think it is like, "AHA! He was told not to follow, therefore when attacked he had no right to self defense." The fact is, the dispatcher suggested he not follow further, AND HE DIDN'T. But even if he had, it would still be self defense and SYG.
My understanding is that they have a special hearing to determine if SYG applies, and if so there is no crime. They have not scheduled such a hearing yet, so SYG probably won't even come into play. I don't think it will be part of the trial without the special hearing.
There will be a SYG hearing. The only way there wouldn't be is if Z didn't claim SYG, which he has. So far, I've heard no-one suggest a cogent reason for not applying SYG. It obviously applies, based on many precedent cases it applies, it can't be denied.
The Judge that would preside over his SYG hearing is Lester.The same judge who revoke his bond for being misleading and not telling the truth at the bond hearing. I don't think that judge will be letting that liar claim SYG.
Imagine that, let people carry guns, shoot people and claim SYG in a southern state and not have bubbas start a shootin and a claimin! I would bet there are more blacks on the receiving end....
Reading that from you means absolutely nothing....remember you smoke weed that "melts the mind"..WTF
You're correct that it would be possible to provoke someone into attacking you, and then be within your legal rights to shoot them. The reason being is that the provocation cannot create license for the attack, and therefore the one being attack still has full self defense rights.
