Chief Walkin Eagle
Well-Known Member
well I guess he wasnt silent, since he was the one giving the answers verbally, and me asking the questions mentally.
Learning...
- Thread starter eye exaggerate
- Start date
Chief Walkin Eagle
Well-Known Member
You think wrong my friend, every time I spoke to him with my mind I was asking questions that needed detailed answers. The ones that did require a yes or a no answer would be backed up with explanations relating to my question.
afrawfraw
Well-Known Member
Sticking your head in the sand won't make us concede your point. Either provide evidence, or proclaim it a belief, not a fact. What's the age old internet egging? "Pictures, or it never happened."? I think that's it. In this case, some empirical evidence. Not, "I saw so there." Not firing at you, just explaining why people are snickering all around.
Chief Walkin Eagle
Well-Known Member
I dont need to provide evidence for peer review for it to be real, how silly (even though all his friends experienced the same thing). Plus, how would I go about getting this evidence? Video tape the act of mind reading? You'll scream "FAKE" at that in a second and say we were acting. I wouldnt make my friend jump through hoops for something that I already know is real anyways... Im afraid the only way to convince you guys is if you go on the most educational field trip of your life and see it for yourself, be prepared to have your proud atheistic views shattered though... That might be tough to let go of...
kpmarine
Well-Known Member
I thought by now you'd have realized that even if your friend proves he could read minds, that it would not effect my feelings about god at all. Psychics, maybe; god, not at all.
Heisenberg
Well-Known Member
I am not sure how someone being psychic would effect my rejection of theism. I am also not sure how someone who resists basic education, like the difference between atheist and skeptic, would be qualified to authenticate anything, especially psychic powers. You have shown that you are too busy tripping over your own prejudicial misunderstandings to properly comprehend reality, falling for a cold reading fits right into your profile.
Chief Walkin Eagle
Well-Known Member
Its been a while since the most robotic of the skeptics responded to me =D
afrawfraw
Well-Known Member
Heisenburg= ___________
Afrawfraw= ____________
Padawan= ____________
Kpmarine= ____________
Zaehet Strife= __________
Simply print this out, hand it to him, and have him fill in our names. How hard could this be? The reality is painfully obvious.
Zaehet Strife
Well-Known Member
^AAAWWWWWW SHIT! nice one Fraw! Plus Rep for sheer brilliance.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Of course that would be too simple... Apparently it doesn't work like that. From what I understand, you must have some sort of connection already established, CWE explained that by saying he was thinking about things, and began thinking 'what if he can hear me' because of the previous circumstances, and that's what began the connection. He can't do it 'on command'. He doesn't want to prove it, or show anybody.
So I guess that's that.. I'm also interested in seeing Chief's acknowledgment of if this were actually true why it wouldn't mean a thing to anyone else's theistic beliefs, but that probably won't happen..
So I guess I'll just get high and finish the rest of this piece of bread and peanut butter..
Chief Walkin Eagle
Well-Known Member
He doesnt even know you guys, he has absolutely nothing to relate to when looking at those names. And your acting like hes the master of the matrix and hes gunna use his master mind to navigate through time and space to look for people he knows absolutely nothing about lol Im sorry but it doesnt work like that, if it did then my friend would probably turn into some spiritual assassin and change the world. It doesnt work over vast distances either, if it did then me and him would be talking all the time about how oblivious and painfully wrong scientific skeptics are, because he'd know every time I thought about him.
Im afraid your only arguments are "Your lying or your crazy*. Peer review of his abilities has already been done multiple times, trickery or illusion doesnt fit in at all with the detailed explanations I've provided. Theres nothing to be done through internet communication to convince you of anything, like I said, save up some money for the most educational field trip of your life, it be worth it.
Heisenberg
Well-Known Member
[video=youtube;bBUc_kATGgg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBUc_kATGgg[/video]
Chief Walkin Eagle
Well-Known Member
I'll take the piano =p I'd have to know the wife, so I dont trust her.
afrawfraw
Well-Known Member
Who's peers?
mindphuk
Well-Known Member
Methinks he has a very mistaken idea what the term peer-review encompasses along with the entirety of the scientific method and critical thinking.
it's so sad that people nowadays can actually graduate from high school with such a lack of understanding. They are supposed to learn this stuff in science classes or get a failing grade and try again.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
I read a story from a teacher who got in trouble for failing a student that wasn't proficient enough to pass. They are actually punishing the teachers for stupid students being stupid and not making an effort to learn the information. That blew my mind, what kind of backwards ass principal or superintendent would approve that shit policy?! (probably one that didn't pass..)
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
It's a logical consequence of the No Child's Behind horse poop. They get funding for passing kids. cn
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
What is the thought process behind 'no child left behind'?
I don't see the benefit of such a program, I'm going to go find a copy and read that retarded shit...
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
670 pages, this ought to be good...
"-improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged
-preparing, training and recruiting high quality teachers and principals"
-so it's semantics? Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged by lowering the standards? What. The. Fuck? Absurd.
-preparing, training and recruiting high quality teachers? By punishing them for demanding effort and results? Who the fuck wrote this piece of shit up?
...lets check...
"-improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged
-preparing, training and recruiting high quality teachers and principals"
-so it's semantics? Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged by lowering the standards? What. The. Fuck? Absurd.
-preparing, training and recruiting high quality teachers? By punishing them for demanding effort and results? Who the fuck wrote this piece of shit up?
...lets check...
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
John Boehner
NCLB was his "proudest achievement" in two decades of public service
George Miller
Introduced a bill that would expand the Federal Pell grants to $5,500 called the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009
Ted Kennedy
Pushed for the act, but argued the Bush admin didn't supply enough funds for it to be effective, Bush admin defended its spending levels given the context of the two wars going on..
Judd Gregg
This fuckin' guys career is littered with suspicious shit! Won $850K from a powerball ticket, became an international adviser for Goldman Sachs in 2011, huge conflict of interest issue with Pease Air Force Base, fuck this scumbag motherfucker, one look into his background reveals enough.