Well, this is what we have to avoid. Allowing our past to infect our current critical thinking. I was an altar boy at Catholic church, I know the bible. But picking bits out and fitting it in a pseudo-scientific manner will not provide answers.will i have all this bible stored in my brain so at times things come together like 2 and 2.. like ankle and foot
Do you have anything more to contribute to the dabate? Or is your ego forcing you to remain on this thread?
...soul, to me, is psyche. It is also 'sun' to me. So, to that effect, one would say "you'll 'get' a soul when all of your parts are integrated". That's the Christian 'son', it is a fully developed psyche. Something about 're-membering' comes to mind...
John Wayne Bobbitt made coin on re-membering. cn
His ex wife was a little off balance then, hey?
Can you elaborate on this idea? I'm not sure I fully understand what you're saying.
She had a reputation for edginess. cn...nice!
...not to mention downright disregard for hungry wildlife
...Christians see the sun as the active (or tangible) phase of something non-tangible. It's an expression of something else that is unseen. There's no doubt that God is the sun in the physical, but also in the psychical. In the sun there is fusion, in a 'son' there is fusion of right / left, etc... a place where opposites exist in harmony.
Is this a particular school of thought? sounds familiar .... is it 'neo islamic' teachings, for want of a better expression.
ego.....its definetly humor not ego hahaha your funny, keep trying 2 convince yourself your an intellectual. seriously dont cry when you talk shit 2 somone and they fuck w you a lil back hahahahaha
...in a way, yes, it would go back to gnosticism. This is also catholic, if you can believe it.
Im not crying, just asking if all you want to do is trade insults or do you have any thoughts that might be considered interesting.
You once again prove your lack of comprehension skills... I have not been talking to you about any kind of belief system all I am attempting to do is convey the very simple truth that it is unknowable how harmful or good any one act or number of acts has been for the world/humanity compared to if something different had have happened... That is just plain and simple fact...
You're right that the definition of consciousness is a problem. Difficult to debate with the confines of a thread. ..... Consciousness could be defined as simply 'sensing' in which case an amoeba could be said to have consciousness.
I thought it sounded like the 5%.
I can already see a problem with that definition as it would have to include those humans that lack the ability to think of abstract concepts or ponder their own mortality, like severely mentally handicapped people or people who go through traumatic brain injuries. They're still awake, alive, but would you call them 'unconscious'? Doesn't unconscious mean the lights go out? You're unconscious when you get KO'd (literally knocked out), and when you go to sleep.