There is no "in crowd" it is a matter of right/wrong...zimm fucked up and someone died...I would wager everything I have that you two would be irate and wanting your pound of flesh if your son or nephew was killed like this.
As I've answered that obvious trap question several times before, my son wouldn't be in that position. First of all, at age 17, my son wouldn't be walking to the store at night and certainly not in the rain.
Secondly, my son would have "used his words" and diffused the situation before it got physical, because he's been taught how to do so and that there are dangerous, armed nuts out there that you don't want to piss off.
Of course, that's assuming that Martin acted differently. If Zimmerman actually did attack, assault or try to physically detain Martin and Martin did nothing to initiate the actual physical altercation, then yes, Zimmerman needs to spend a good deal of time in the pokie.
However, I've seen ZERO evidence from anyone that it happened that way. Not saying it didn't, just saying without that evidence and the presumption of innocence a juror must start with, it's a tough sell, even with inconsistencies in Zimmerman's account. I'd still put it at 50/50 as to who attacked who. As a juror, I'd need that information to overcome doubts, convict and send a man to jail.
