I would prefer my Tit sucking to be called "Steak and Lobster Eater"...Thank you. Cheese gums up your pores and makes you smell bad.cheese eater.
I would prefer my Tit sucking to be called "Steak and Lobster Eater"...Thank you. Cheese gums up your pores and makes you smell bad.cheese eater.
which only means this must be the best thread ever...Something just draws us to it..I say justice for TRAYVON
I would prefer my Tit sucking to be called "Steak and Lobster Eater"...Thank you. Cheese gums up your pores and makes you smell bad.
Lets see, facts. Zimm gets in his truck to go to the store, Zimm sees a stranger hanging around in the dark in the RAIN. WHen Zimm tries to ascertain what this stranger is doing, he calls 911 to report suspicious activity and then the stranger starts running away. Any logical dumb ass might assume that when another person runs away that they just might be guilty of something and do not want to get caught, the guy isn't in jogging gear and people don't normally jog in the dark in the rain, but someone as dumb as you might just think " Oh well nothing going on around here, I should go to the store and just hope that my house doesn't get broken into." Yep, that is you alright.
Just because trayvon wasn't actually doing anything illegal, his actions could have EASILY been interpreted as Suspicious activity, especially given all the break ins that had recently happened. And especially when he ran, the fact that he then attacked Zimm makes his actions inexcusable. You obviously have never come home to find your home in a mess and all your valuables gone, have you? It doesn't feel good I can tell you. ANd you have probably never had to fend off an attacker eh? Little girls don't count you big tough man you.
i got to say if an angry latino man with a gun comes running toward me im gonna fucking run as fast as i can too.
i understand zimmermans situation but chasing a guy thru the rain with gun just because he looked suspicious is a stretch to say the least.
i can't even say that if he kept following me i would not have reacted the same way put in the exact circumstances. that doen't make it right or absolve me of responsibility for assault, but since he is dead he can't really be changed.
i understand zimmermans situation but chasing a guy thru the rain with gun just because he looked suspicious is a stretch to say the least.
Where the hell have you read that he was chasing him with his gun out?
Let me guess you get your news info from Uncle Buck and Londonfog
i apologize for my earlier post, i mistakenly made it seem as tho he had a gun out waving it around, that was not my intention when i said with a gun. The only relevance of the gun is that if it had not been there trayvon would be on trail for assault right now and zimmerman would be sitting on a nice fat check.
how many more people are going to make the assumption that martin was attacking rather than defending himself despite all the evidence showing zimm to be the aggressor on offense while martin ran away and talked on his phone?
where does this unfounded assumption come from? are pot smokers generally known as violent people?
seriously, someone needs to explain this assumption to me. what enraged martin so much that after running away, he went on the attack? what was his motive?
being afraid, the same thing that caused zimmerman to draw his gun, would be my guess. flight or fight, choose flight and they give chance what choice do you have?
so your theory is that martin attacked zimmerman out of nowhere because he was afraid of him? that doesn't make any sense.
nor does it fit with what we know about their mindsets that night. i mean, previous actions clearly show martin chose flight, and he has no history of violence at all. he was a cannabis consumer as well.
none of what you said makes any sense unless circumstances changed. like say, zimm tried to physically detain martin.
so your theory is that martin attacked zimmerman out of nowhere because he was afraid of him? that doesn't make any sense.
nor does it fit with what we know about their mindsets that night. i mean, previous actions clearly show martin chose flight, and he has no history of violence at all. he was a cannabis consumer as well.
none of what you said makes any sense unless circumstances changed. like say, zimm tried to physically detain martin.
That's the thing that startles me about this thread. The amount of actual dependable evidence that we outsiders have in hand is so small. So we have eight-thousand-plus posts built on speculations (mostly about character), loyalties, assorted politics, innuendo and no small amount of out-uendo. cn
ahh, your sooooo fast =S, i can't keep up..... see edit.
i know its stupid, but i almost always hit post then go back and edit after re-reading it. that might also be why you hate my spelling so much.
i see what you mean, but if you try flight and they chase you, you often turn to confront them when it seems you have the upper hand. again i speaking personally here, i have no idea what was actually going thru there heads.
None of us has a CLUE what really went down that night.
I've never said anything with certainty! lol! Due to Zimm's police report stating, ya know, that he was attacked and the photo showing the blood on the back of his head.............it APPEARS as if Zimmerman MAY have been attacked. Is that perfectly clear in simple enough, short winded, non bullshit terms for ya? Now, was Zimmerman the actual aggressor? I don't know, but I'm not seeing this overwhelming evidence that you guys seem to see.yet you have no problem stating with certainty who attacked who. LOL!
i love how you try to walk back your statements with these long winded say-nothings, you do it all the time.
can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
Glad I'm not the only one who see that shityet you have no problem stating with certainty who attacked who. LOL!
i love how you try to walk back your statements with these long winded say-nothings, you do it all the time.
can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
your edit, which is bad form, still doesn't explain shit. so i'll repost the question in hopes that someone who can read and type out a cogent thoguht without having to edit it seven times can provide a reasoned explanation, unlike the nonsensical one you gave.
how many more people are going to make the assumption that martin was attacking rather than defending himself despite all the evidence showing zimm to be the aggressor on offense while martin ran away and talked on his phone?
where does this unfounded assumption come from? are pot smokers generally known as violent people?
seriously, someone needs to explain this assumption to me. what enraged martin so much that after running away, he went on the attack? what was his motive?
Sorry, I cant understand you with Bucky's knob protruding so deeply into your oral cavity.kiss-assGlad I'm not the only one who see that shit
I've never said anything with certainty! lol! Due to Zimm's police report stating, ya know, that he was attacked and the photo showing the blood on the back of his head.............it APPEARS as if Zimmerman MAY have been attacked. Is that perfectly clear in simple enough, short winded, non bullshit terms for ya? Now, was Zimmerman the actual aggressor? I don't know, but I'm not seeing this overwhelming evidence that you guys seem to see.![]()