UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yes i do, in fact.Do you honestly think that anybody in the US owns their own body?
yes i do, in fact.Do you honestly think that anybody in the US owns their own body?
Yeah because the government coerces them. I haven't got the time or patience to wait for you to get to the point.society for the most part already plays nice.
So whatever I do with my body is mine to keep, right?yes i do, in fact.
And how many murders in general?since this thread was started, 97 people have died due to gun violence.
again, a polite society is a polite society. an armed society is a hostile, mistrusting, fearful, violent, coercive society.Yeah because the government coerces them. I haven't got the time or patience to wait for you to get to the point.
See, you would rather the government coerce people into being polite but the government, despite it's best efforts, cannot be everywhere, all of the time. Therefore, our security falls into our own hands. Thus, an armed society truly IS a polite society, not because people are afraid, because people are secure.
Proof that Americans who respect and cherish our 2nd amendment out number those who don't!Amount of money the NRA spends lobbying lawmakers per year: $3.5 million
Amount of money anti-gun groups spend: $250,000
Amount of money the NRA spends on political commercials for republican candidates during election years: $7.2 million
Amount of money gun manufacturers contribute to the NRA per year: $17.5 million
Since this thread was started, 1,209 people have died from Tobacco use.since this thread was started, 97 people have died due to gun violence.
Proof that Americans who respect and cherish our 2nd amendment out number those who don't!
Either that or its proof that anti gun groups are very few in number, financially destitute, or unreasonably McScrooge like in their use of charity. I suppose they could also just not be such ardent supporters of anti-gun propaganda. In this case the stupid gullible people are winning so hard that even the anti gun losers are starting to turncoat and join the other side.No, its proof that stupid and gullible people such as yourself are pawns for gun manufacturers.
I'm missing the consecution of logic here. Are you suggesting that differential funding reveals truth? That would absolutely transform lobbyists from parasitic procurers of interest to ... humble merchants of moral suasion. Oh gawd ... I think I just sprained my thalamus ... owie ... cnNo, its proof that stupid and gullible people such as yourself are pawns for gun manufacturers.
again, an armed society is an armed society. an obese, over intrusive government makes a hostile, mistrusting, fearful, violent society.again, a polite society is a polite society. an armed society is a hostile, mistrusting, fearful, violent, coercive society.
so funny that you rail against people that cannot use proper grammar, spelling, word usage, etc, yet you continue to ignore what has been said and twist things around to fit your needs. I said, people in an armed society are polite because they are secure, not coerced. I am one of the most polite people I know. It's not because of any coercion, it's because I was raised that way. You are not, probably for the same reason, that's the way you were raised. You think it's perfectly alright to act anyway you want and say anything you want as long as you feel good about yourself... THAT is not only hypocritical, it's ignorant.so funny that you rail against a government which "coerces" at the point of a gun, yet when you coerce politeness at the point of a gun, it's righteous.
pure hypocrisy.
I think you are overdosing on estrogen, it's affecting what's left of your mind. Does it also make your breasts grow?if the government were to prohibit firearms to the Nth degree, only the richest and most successful thugs could afford the things. as it is, any douche with some pocket money can get one, as they are so readily available.
yes, it is one form of security. I would rather be responsible for my own security and keep the government's nose out of my business.security comes in many forms, being armed to the teeth is only one of these many forms.
When we apply a criterion of "effective and reliable" to these many forms of security ... which are left? cnagain, a polite society is a polite society. an armed society is a hostile, mistrusting, fearful, violent, coercive society.
so funny that you rail against a government which "coerces" at the point of a gun, yet when you coerce politeness at the point of a gun, it's righteous.
pure hypocrisy.
if the government were to prohibit firearms to the Nth degree, only the richest and most successful thugs could afford the things. as it is, any douche with some pocket money can get one, as they are so readily available.
security comes in many forms, being armed to the teeth is only one of these many forms.
I'm missing the consecution of logic here. Are you suggesting that differential funding reveals truth? That would absolutely transform lobbyists from parasitic procurers of interest to ... humble merchants of moral suasion. Oh gawd ... I think I just sprained my thalamus ... owie ... cn
This is so true. Just observe how the media, mainstream and otherwise, continue to relentlessly demonize the gun. Oh those wild&wacky corporate interests; they're everywhere. And that's why so many Americans think gun control is just peachy. cnIf you fail to understand the logic behind a corporation having billions at their disposal to push an agenda compared to people donating money for a cause you're farther lost than I suspected. Polls show that Americans are pretty evenly split when it comes to gun control, unfortunately one side's voice gets muffled due to corporate backing of the other side. I don't know what it is about righties but they love to be lackeys for corporate causes.