UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
there are laws against the stalking that zimm did.
White Girl Bleed A Lot
- Thread starter desert dude
- Start date
there are laws against the stalking that zimm did.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
784.048 Stalking;
definitions; penalties.—
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Harass” means to engage in a
course of conduct directed at a specific person which causes substantial
emotional distress to that person and serves no legitimate purpose.
(b) “Course of conduct” means a
pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however
short, which evidences a continuity of purpose. The term does not include
constitutionally protected activity such as picketing or other organized
protests.
(c) “Credible threat” means a verbal
or nonverbal threat, or a combination of the two, including threats delivered by
electronic communication or implied by a pattern of conduct, which places the
person who is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety
or the safety of his or her family members or individuals closely associated
with the person, and which is made with the apparent ability to carry out the
threat to cause such harm. It is not necessary to prove that the person making
the threat had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present
incarceration of the person making the threat is not a bar to prosecution under
this section.
(d) “Cyberstalk” means to engage in
a course of conduct to communicate, or to cause to be communicated, words,
images, or language by or through the use of electronic mail or electronic
communication, directed at a specific person, causing substantial emotional
distress to that person and serving no legitimate purpose.
(2) A person who willfully,
maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person
commits the offense of stalking, a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable
as provided in s. 775.082
or s. 775.083.
(3) A person who willfully,
maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person and
makes a credible threat to that person commits the offense of aggravated
stalking, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082,
s. 775.083,
or s. 775.084.
(4) A person who, after an
injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating
violence pursuant to s. 784.046,
or an injunction for protection against domestic violence pursuant to s. 741.30,
or after any other court-imposed prohibition of conduct toward the subject
person or that person’s property, knowingly, willfully, maliciously, and
repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense
of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in
s. 775.082,
s. 775.083,
or s. 775.084.
(5) A person who willfully,
maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks a child under 16
years of age commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082,
s. 775.083,
or s. 775.084.
(6) A law enforcement officer may
arrest, without a warrant, any person that he or she has probable cause to
believe has violated this section.
(7) A person who, after having been
sentenced for a violation of s. 794.011,
s. 800.04,
or s. 847.0135(5)
and prohibited from contacting the victim of the offense under s. 921.244,
willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks the
victim commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree,
punishable as provided in s. 775.082,
s. 775.083,
or s. 775.084.
(
this section shall run consecutive to any former sentence imposed for a
conviction for any offense under s. 794.011,
s. 800.04,
or s. 847.0135(5).
(9)(a) The sentencing court shall
consider, as a part of any sentence, issuing an order restraining the defendant
from any contact with the victim, which may be valid for up to 10 years, as
determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of
any such order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the
probability of future violations by the perpetrator, and the safety of the
victim and his or her family members or individuals closely associated with the
victim.
(b) The order may be issued by the
court even if the defendant is sentenced to a state prison or a county jail or
even if the imposition of the sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed
on probation.
History.—s. 1, ch.
92-208; s. 29, ch. 94-134; s. 29, ch. 94-135; s. 2, ch. 97-27; s. 23, ch.
2002-55; s. 1, ch. 2003-23; s. 3, ch. 2004-17; s. 3, ch. 2004-256; s. 17, ch.
2008-172; s. 2, ch. 2012-153.
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/.../0784.048.html
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
How about this from the national sherriffs association
"The alleged action of a self-appointed neighborhood watchman last month in Sanford, FL significantly contradicts the principles of the Neighborhood Watch Program, stated NSA Executive Director Aaron D. Kennard, Sheriff (ret.). NSA has no information indicating the community where the incident occurred has ever even registered with the NSA Neighborhood Watch program.
The Neighborhood Watch Program fosters collaboration and cooperation with the community and local law enforcement by encouraging citizens to be aware of what is going on in their communities and contact law enforcement if they suspect something NOT take the law in their own hands, continued Executive Director Kennard. The alleged participant ignored everything the Neighborhood Watch Program stands for and it resulted in a young man losing his life. Our thoughts and prayers are with the family of Trayvon Martin during this terrible time.
http://www.lawofficer.com/article/news/national-sheriff-s-association-0
"The alleged action of a self-appointed neighborhood watchman last month in Sanford, FL significantly contradicts the principles of the Neighborhood Watch Program, stated NSA Executive Director Aaron D. Kennard, Sheriff (ret.). NSA has no information indicating the community where the incident occurred has ever even registered with the NSA Neighborhood Watch program.
The Neighborhood Watch Program fosters collaboration and cooperation with the community and local law enforcement by encouraging citizens to be aware of what is going on in their communities and contact law enforcement if they suspect something NOT take the law in their own hands, continued Executive Director Kennard. The alleged participant ignored everything the Neighborhood Watch Program stands for and it resulted in a young man losing his life. Our thoughts and prayers are with the family of Trayvon Martin during this terrible time.
http://www.lawofficer.com/article/news/national-sheriff-s-association-0
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
instance #1: zimm is leaving his house and see martin come out from behind the houses. he tells police in the reenactment video that he slowed down to check him out.
instance #2: zimm is parked at the clubhouse and see martin come by, follows him in his truck, and then on foot.
instance #3: after zimm loses sight of martin after martin runs, he goes looking for him south of the T, as he told serino towards the end of the final interrogation. that is why they ended up 50 feet south of the T where zimm says he was jumped and pinned.
3 separate encounters. enjoy that crow, we're enjoying freshly harvested carrots. wife is chopping them for freezing as we speak.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
all he did was post a definition, he was never uncivil, cheese eater.
and there is no legitimate purpose to follow some kid who just has skittles and iced tea. if he is acting suspicious, report it. stalking him? we don't need him to do that.
This means nothing and has no relevancy to the case, at all.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
784.048 Stalking;
definitions; penalties.—
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Harass” means to engage in a
course of conduct directed at a specific person which causes substantial
emotional distress to that person and serves no legitimate purpose.
(b) “Course of conduct” means a
pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however
short, which evidences a continuity of purpose. The term does not include
constitutionally protected activity such as picketing or other organized
protests.
(c) “Credible threat” means a verbal
or nonverbal threat, or a combination of the two, including threats delivered by
electronic communication or implied by a pattern of conduct, which places the
person who is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety
or the safety of his or her family members or individuals closely associated
with the person, and which is made with the apparent ability to carry out the
threat to cause such harm. It is not necessary to prove that the person making
the threat had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present
incarceration of the person making the threat is not a bar to prosecution under
this section.
(d) “Cyberstalk” means to engage in
a course of conduct to communicate, or to cause to be communicated, words,
images, or language by or through the use of electronic mail or electronic
communication, directed at a specific person, causing substantial emotional
distress to that person and serving no legitimate purpose.
(2) A person who willfully,
maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person
commits the offense of stalking, a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable
as provided in s. 775.082
or s. 775.083.
(3) A person who willfully,
maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person and
makes a credible threat to that person commits the offense of aggravated
stalking, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082,
s. 775.083,
or s. 775.084.
(4) A person who, after an
injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating
violence pursuant to s. 784.046,
or an injunction for protection against domestic violence pursuant to s. 741.30,
or after any other court-imposed prohibition of conduct toward the subject
person or that person’s property, knowingly, willfully, maliciously, and
repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense
of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in
s. 775.082,
s. 775.083,
or s. 775.084.
(5) A person who willfully,
maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks a child under 16
years of age commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third
degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082,
s. 775.083,
or s. 775.084.
(6) A law enforcement officer may
arrest, without a warrant, any person that he or she has probable cause to
believe has violated this section.
(7) A person who, after having been
sentenced for a violation of s. 794.011,
s. 800.04,
or s. 847.0135(5)
and prohibited from contacting the victim of the offense under s. 921.244,
willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks the
victim commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree,
punishable as provided in s. 775.082,
s. 775.083,
or s. 775.084.
(
this section shall run consecutive to any former sentence imposed for a
conviction for any offense under s. 794.011,
s. 800.04,
or s. 847.0135(5).
(9)(a) The sentencing court shall
consider, as a part of any sentence, issuing an order restraining the defendant
from any contact with the victim, which may be valid for up to 10 years, as
determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of
any such order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the
probability of future violations by the perpetrator, and the safety of the
victim and his or her family members or individuals closely associated with the
victim.
(b) The order may be issued by the
court even if the defendant is sentenced to a state prison or a county jail or
even if the imposition of the sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed
on probation.
History.—s. 1, ch.
92-208; s. 29, ch. 94-134; s. 29, ch. 94-135; s. 2, ch. 97-27; s. 23, ch.
2002-55; s. 1, ch. 2003-23; s. 3, ch. 2004-17; s. 3, ch. 2004-256; s. 17, ch.
2008-172; s. 2, ch. 2012-153.
nope, sorry, not in any reasonable persons mind and certainly not enough to pass muster for a trial or any kind of civil action. You're a nut to think those are SEPARATE encounters. Its all just ONE encounter and nothing more, your attempt at being a lawyer is feeble at best, best to stay someone's sidekick instead, then people won't notice your failures so much.
Are you attempting to make me, a farmer, jealous with the recanting of your veggie tales?
Mind telling us the malicious part?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
three encounters.
if i ran away from someone, and that person went looking for me and found me again, i would say that i encountered that person AGAIN. so would anyone else.
i bet my corn is further along than yours is, plowboy.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
You are drunk and giggling to yourself
you think it's hilarious to play stupid
later after you pass out while trying to masturbate
You wont think it's funny when your room mate and his girlfriend come home
and your dick is hanging out
good night
You are right, any insane person WOULD agree with you. That aside, no one in their right mind is going to try this type of angle in court, rest assured bucky, your special prosecution is still safe.
Your corn might be further along, When did yours go to pollination?
[video=youtube;LtHr7gluh08]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtHr7gluh08[/video]
skunkd0c
Well-Known Member
see if you can find a black guy holding a broken bottle
uncle buck is still upset because his clones will not root LOL noob
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
mine already have several ears a piece on them. should be a week or two until i'm chowing down.
if i run away from someone i just encountered, and they seek me out and find me again, then we have just encountered each other again, for a second time.
by your definition, my wife and i have only ever encountered each other once.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
only takes me 12 days to go 95% success rate and they're all healthy and green all over when they go into soil. you should check that thread for updates.
but again, thanks for adding nothing to this thread.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
"these assholes always get away" "fucking goons"
mr nicely anomus
Member
1234567890
It's a single instance when it all happens within 10 minutes time, you can't "Stalk" someone in 10 minutes.
mr nicely anomus
Member
ha its gona become like sexisem woman will be all flirty in the work place guy flits back and gets the sack cuz guys dont complain 3/4 of the time.. or errm how in devorce cases why do the women most of the time end up with the kids becuse in the judge and jurys mind thinks a motrhers more careing and genrally better at raiseing children than men this statement is sexist biest and has no grounds for its truth content in reality. unless proven by facts disconected to sex, funily by being so politicly correct we push the boundry to far in the outher direction and are left with no gound to stand on when the tables of discrimination flip, if evryone became a geek tomorrow thay would be the bullys in school >aw look its thik matty< blah blah and yeh whites are becomeing a minority the worst part is we do all thies things to hellp cultures mix and then you end up with pepole walking around in packs of thair genetic relative's , refuseing to speak our lanquadge on purpous , pepole walking around with serimonial daggers , rastafarians legally growing thair own weed well to a degree , burkas , i mean yeh ok we have to except thair culture but it'd be nice if more exceptid ours and tryed to mix more half of the time thay get away with things we wouldent while under the same law visiting our country, go have a pasinate night with ya misses or boy in dubi see if thare as flexible and excepting as our country is to outher cultures... thave got to start looking at equal rights not anti descrimination policys becuse by trying to make it fair if you ask me in some cases thave made it worse. were half way to equal rights, next on the list to remove goverment officals diplomatic immunity so thay can get arrested like the rest of us, yet again thade probibly just close the police station thay work at, and run againt thair frend in the next election, whos to say it matters who you vote on congress will allways use them as a puppet repace congress for parliment in the uk shaddow cbinets etc we dont vote them in, yeh thares alot wrong with the system but thares probibly more right in the uk than wrong nhs policeing firebrigade etc god knows how long it will be before evrythings privitised and we wont need a goverment it would be like a new order to the way things work in the world china at the top lolz and its becuse we wanted cheap gadgets
So if I call you an asshole, that means I intend to do you harm? LOL I suppose you go around punching everyone who doesn't agree with your point of view and call it self defense eh? Or maybe calling a person a goon is the same as shankin' their ass huh? and the proper defense is to shoot first ask questions later?
Similar threads
