Vote Ron Paul 2012

beardo

beardo

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
but can he get enough votes to become POTUS...if not what the hell does that matter ^^^^^^??? Even crazy killers make news.
Click to expand...
The votes of the people do not matter, we are not a democracy
It's the electoral college that picks the president.
 
RyanTheRhino

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
DSB65 said:
bro i like you and you grow good..but you should get baned with all the personal attacks...get a life your better than this.....
Click to expand...

well He did denounce his modship and basically told us he likes to troll to much to be held back by a mod title. & you got drunk on Fridays or something

so we accept you both... I have had drunk nights too. boss just didn't catch me :-P


This is my visual representation of a Buck post.

 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
RyanTheRhino said:
You know what I bet he will get more write-in votes then Gary Johnson will get. He will get enough votes off ballot to make news, and that still means something.
Click to expand...
i bet you his "revolution" does just as shitty in 2012 as it did in 2008, when his "revolution" netted him a massive 40k votes out of over 100 million.

hell, alan keyes came out ahead of rawn pawl last time. so much pawl fail.
 
mccumcumber

mccumcumber

Well-Known Member
I guess a political section in a mj forum already lacks any credibility whatsoever. But this Paul spam surely isn't fucking helping. I've said it multiple times already, some mod should just make a Ron Paul sub section. His whole fan club can jerk off to the thought of Paul as President, and I wouldn't have to see Ron Paul being mentioned in EVERY FUCKING THREAD. Win win imo.
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
mccumcumber said:
I guess a political section in a mj forum already lacks any credibility whatsoever. But this Paul spam surely isn't fucking helping. I've said it multiple times already, some mod should just make a Ron Paul sub section. His whole fan club can jerk off to the thought of Paul as President, and I wouldn't have to see Ron Paul being mentioned in EVERY FUCKING THREAD. Win win imo.
Click to expand...
If its about Ron Paul, then don't open the fucking thread... dumbass.

Win/win
 
mccumcumber

mccumcumber

Well-Known Member
I'm not really crying about it. Nice picture taboot. Looks like it took you a whole bunch of effort.

Now, if you refer back to what I posted you'll see that I simply said that this whole spam of one, pretty politically insignificant, presidential candidate/senator is dumb. You guys love Ron Paul... we get it. It just leads to nothing but personal attacks, as witnessed by your reactions, when someone gets tired of the spam. And simply suggest something different.

If your goal is to make the RIU forum look like another Ron Paul appreciate site, then you're making headway.

As far as mj is concerned. You really want mj to be legal? 'Cause the President isn't really going to make any change in that front. You're going to need to elect a congress that will help you out. Why don't you look into senators that think like Paul, if you really want Paul's pseudo libertarianism as our civic. Or, better yet, why don't you look into actual libertarian candidates! The possibilities are endless, and probably more fruitful than wasting your time on some forum eflexing and Paul spamming.
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
mccumcumber said:
I'm not really crying about it. Nice picture taboot. Looks like it took you a whole bunch of effort.

Now, if you refer back to what I posted you'll see that I simply said that this whole spam of one, pretty politically insignificant, presidential candidate/senator is dumb. You guys love Ron Paul... we get it. It just leads to nothing but personal attacks, as witnessed by your reactions, when someone gets tired of the spam. And simply suggest something different.

If your goal is to make the RIU forum look like another Ron Paul appreciate site, then you're making headway.

As far as mj is concerned. You really want mj to be legal? 'Cause the President isn't really going to make any change in that front. You're going to need to elect a congress that will help you out. Why don't you look into senators that think like Paul, if you really want Paul's pseudo libertarianism as our civic. Or, better yet, why don't you look into actual libertarian candidates! The possibilities are endless, and probably more fruitful than wasting your time on some forum eflexing and Paul spamming.
Click to expand...

You mad brah? Maybe we can have someone dictate the acceptable topics for the forums. Maybe we should ban abortion debates, which are much more worn out then a two party system debate, which is what this thread is about if you actually read it. We should only be allowed to discuss things as many times as you want so sayeth the forum dictator. When you are tired of stuff, we will limit our discussion as to not offend you. There are plenty of non ron paul threads, yet here you are in the closest thing to a ron paul thread, bitching. Big surprise, you are like the old lady that hates going to the movie theater, but goes anyways and bitches the whole time. If you don't like the thread, then move on loser.
 
mccumcumber

mccumcumber

Well-Known Member
Do you just not understand what I'm saying?

I guarantee that all of those threads mention Ron Paul multiple times in some way or form.

And I never made any suggestion that we ought to limit what the topic of threads should be. I simply said that Ron Paul should have a subforum because of his popularity. If you really want to continue to make threads about Ron Paul, or bring him up in every thread, just to have them get bashed and start arguments fine, so be it.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
rawn pawl is not pro marijuana, he would have no problem if you state chose to prohibit it entirely.
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
mccumcumber said:
Do you just not understand what I'm saying?

I guarantee that all of those threads mention Ron Paul multiple times in some way or form.

And I never made any suggestion that we ought to limit what the topic of threads should be. I simply said that Ron Paul should have a subforum because of his popularity. If you really want to continue to make threads about Ron Paul, or bring him up in every thread, just to have them get bashed and start arguments fine, so be it.
Click to expand...
So you want to segregate the Ron Paul people from the political discussion? how honorable of you, you are just looking out for us right?
:o
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
rawn pawl is not pro marijuana, he would have no problem if you state chose to prohibit it entirely.
Click to expand...
Suck it loser.

Ron Paul wants to end federal laws against marijuana, unlike Obama who uses them to shut down mmj facilities.
Which is better:

Having states decide on their own and not be prosecuted while other decide not to.

Or

All states cannot decide and it remains illegal.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
lifegoesonbrah said:
Suck it loser.

Ron Paul wants to end federal laws against marijuana, unlike Obama who uses them to shut down mmj facilities.
Which is better:

Having states decide on their own and not be prosecuted while other decide not to.

Or

All states cannot decide and it remains illegal.
Click to expand...
false dichotomies are a logical fallacy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top