Dev
Active Member
On the weekend I was smoking with my dealer, when an interesting debate came about. I started by saying that weed should be legal and assumed I was preaching to the converted. However everyone disagreed saying, that they prefer weed being illegal. Wait..what!
The argument was that once you grow your own and have a circle of smoking friends it was both better quality and more cost effective than government regulated weed which would incorporate tax levies, distribution costs and profit margins and labour costs. Reducing the economies of scale benefit that would exist if legalised and produced commercially. Considering regulation (Making sure the smokers are 18+) would be a big push on legalising it, expensive licences to grow and sell would be required.
It would also be very vulnerable to high taxes as it would be seen as easy money as the government who would no doubt want to actively discourage use. Even to more of an extent than tobacco and alcohol, because there is already a strong anti-marijuana bias in both government and people.
Threat of legal persecution for people who wish to grow and sell illegally wouldn't really change, considering it would be available legally much of the market who prefer take the legalised avenue. Many pot users currently face little in the way of legal persecution anyway often nothing more than confiscation provided it's obvious it's for personal use.
The assumptions to this argument:
Also just to note this argument only focuses on the end user. I'm not concerned with other perspectives such that legalising it would help the government budget or that currently you are supporting organised crime or what ever.
-Dev
The argument was that once you grow your own and have a circle of smoking friends it was both better quality and more cost effective than government regulated weed which would incorporate tax levies, distribution costs and profit margins and labour costs. Reducing the economies of scale benefit that would exist if legalised and produced commercially. Considering regulation (Making sure the smokers are 18+) would be a big push on legalising it, expensive licences to grow and sell would be required.
It would also be very vulnerable to high taxes as it would be seen as easy money as the government who would no doubt want to actively discourage use. Even to more of an extent than tobacco and alcohol, because there is already a strong anti-marijuana bias in both government and people.
Threat of legal persecution for people who wish to grow and sell illegally wouldn't really change, considering it would be available legally much of the market who prefer take the legalised avenue. Many pot users currently face little in the way of legal persecution anyway often nothing more than confiscation provided it's obvious it's for personal use.
The assumptions to this argument:
- You grow your own and have some good connections.
- You don't live in an almost Nazi like anti-marijuana state/nation, where you face prison or large fines for small/personal amounts.
- You don't intend on producing it commercially if legalised.
Also just to note this argument only focuses on the end user. I'm not concerned with other perspectives such that legalising it would help the government budget or that currently you are supporting organised crime or what ever.
-Dev