Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
your entire thesis is predicated on the assumption that the immediate and pervasive threat of violence and robbery presented by anarchy would not prevent such "free market actors" from even forming. there can be no free market until the merchant,, farmer, sheepherder and blacksmith all feel confident in exposing themselves to the hazards of travel to that market. the fundamental lack of such security precludes any market actions at all in places like Somalia, or the shining path occupied regions of peru and argentina. when every village or freehold must be an armed camp to defend itself from the raiders who come to steal, then there is no market at all. only small collectives struggling to survive on the edge starvation surrounded by robbers brigands and theives just itching to get in and pillage.Dr Kynes,
An authority or regulatory body need not be government. Such things can be free market in nature. Government leads to inefficiency and apathy.
A good example is lifeguards. There is this private company and government endorsed Red Cross were examined. The private company does random audits of all lifeguards, but mostly their own. The longer a Red Cross lifeguard had been certified, the lazier they became and would not pass even a Red Cross audit. While the private company had higher audit scores always well above passing, with well fewer failing. The reason is these privately certified lifeguards had a higher level of confidence and the certification company would bear some of the responsibility if their lifeguard was neglegent and would alter their certification methods unlike the Red Cross.
Private regulatory entities can also be replaced by a competitor who would like that role. It would be like adopting another country's DMV, say France. Have you ever been to a California DMV? I would take the French version if it meant shorter lines, not arrogant employees, and was ran like a real business. Ever notice how the "employees" have an entitlement attitude?
I see replacing those services with private ones as essential. What choice do you have if you don't like our current DMV? Our current DMV is counter-intuitive to a free market. Even threat of it's replacement would've fixed it, but now the only solution is replacement. But now you can't do that as easily with government or at all.
The silly arguement against what I suggest is corruption and syndicates. But what is going on now? What we have is fucking rosey, and not corrupt bullshit? Even though we have dispensaries, a war machine comes and overturns with force what the free market wants. A vice isn't a criminal act, but you can commit them on or because of one. Just like with non-vices, a crazy spouse, for example, become delusional or jealous and harm or kill their partner. Getting rid of vices and treating them like criminal offenses solves nothing and makes the situation worse. Government and religion never understand this no matter the evidence.
how many lifeguards are securing the safety of bathers swimmers and holiday makers on the beaches of somalia or uganda's lake victoria?