Give everyone guns for all i care, if everyone has them shooting deaths will triple, bet my life on it
My solution? nobody can have automatics or assault rifles ...own a gun? sure..in your home...not out in public...you want less crime? stop locking up people for weed and overloading the court docket will silly shit... when you rob someone at gunpoint and get arrested/convicted ..and you get less time then most people growing a harmless plant..that is a huge fucking problem.
What's your guys solution then? Since you don't believe people have the right to protect themselves....
What I continue to ask is that you stop trying to abridge my rights
do i have to correct every retarded misinterpretation here?
the point of this thread was not that no one should have the right to self protection, it was that more guns in that theater was not the solution.
The point of this thread is to insult the idea that people have the right to protect themselves by legally being armed while the lefties offering no alternative solutions.
The point of this thread is to insult the idea that people have the right to protect themselves by legally being armed while the lefties offering no alternative solutions.
Seemed to emerge yesterday that the "shooter" didn't even point/fire his weapon at NYPD officers, yet they still smoked him.
He supposedly had a .45 semi with a magazine, so I assume a 1911? He didn't fire at officers, but he did produce it. Doesn't Manhattan have a handgun ban too?Video is on the internet
it is kinda bizarre the way it looked
[video=youtube;EYWgrHwrlf8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYWgrHwrlf8[/video]
He bought the gun legally in Florida in 1991 never registered it in New YorkHe supposedly had a .45 semi with a magazine, so I assume a 1911? He didn't fire at officers, but he did produce it. Doesn't Manhattan have a handgun ban too?
Thanks for that video, newspaper made it out he didn't point or fire, he clearly pointed it at officers tho.
I think this is the guy I was referring toThe problem with this WHOLE thread is that there is ZERO evidence to support the conclusion that armed people in Colorado would have shot innocent people. None. Just because it happened in this circumstance does not mean it will happen the same way in all circumstances and anyone who says it will is an idiot.
Yeah, I am sure more guns and shooters would have resulted in less death/injury.LOL I picture a dozen cowboys shooting at anyone they see with a gun..probably shoot at each other and return fire.
Yeah, I am sure more guns and shooters would have resulted in less death/injury.LOL I picture a dozen cowboys shooting at anyone they see with a gun..probably shoot at each other and return fire.