budlover13
King Tut
My local taxes take care of that. Get it? LOCAL taxes.I dont want to pay for the road in front of your house either
My local taxes take care of that. Get it? LOCAL taxes.I dont want to pay for the road in front of your house either
yep, and when we didn't have unions. Who the fuck do those "pee on's" think they are?People were better off when there was "slavery"
Totally totally fucking wrongMy local taxes take care of that. Get it? LOCAL taxes.
I have fire ins. but just got a bill for $150 from the state because I live near a National Forest. How is that fair when the majority of fires are started by folks just passin thru...........My local taxes take care of that. Get it? LOCAL taxes.
Ummm, the local street in front of my house was not paid for by federal dot, htsa, or otherwise. i think you are talking about interstate highways.Totally totally fucking wrong
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
I have fire ins. but just got a bill for $150 from the state because I live near a National Forest. How is that fair when the majority of fires are started by folks just passin thru...........
Yep, by the insurance companies. (if you want protection)Yeah, i don't understand it either. Do people living in the city get extra bills because of the higher crime rate?
you sure about that?Ummm, the local street in front of my house was not paid for by federal dot, htsa, or otherwise. i think you are talking about interstate highways.
Well of course a small municipality will take the funds if they're available. That's how the state and federal government gets their hooks into local politics. Which is the problem i would like to see an end to.you sure about that?
State and Federal Funds
Available for
Local Agency Projects
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/lam/Transportation_Funding_Guidebook.pdf
What deflectionWell of course a small municipality will take the funds if they're available. That's how the state and federal government gets their hooks into local politics. Which is the problem i would like to see an end to.
In the end, nice deflection.
That goes against self-preservation imo. Giving your money away for something that you don't want.What deflection
Do you concede I am right?
You should
And I still dont want to pay for your roads
But i still do
My local taxes take care of that. Get it? LOCAL taxes.
Thanks I appreciate honestyThat goes against self-preservation imo. Giving your money away for something that you don't want.
i concede federal money gets used locally but we could manage just fine without it. If people, as a society, weren't so willing to have someone "care" for them.
A harm would result in an event where actual damage took place, so that restitution can occur. For instance I break your window. I fix or pay to fix your window. Making faces or hurting somebodies feelings or committing a fashion crime are difficult to restitute.But you see, you have uncovered yet another problem with your magical world Rob. Definition, specificaly the definition of harm. If Ches sees insult as harm then who is to say he is incorrect? You? And if you maintain that you didn't harm him but he says you did, who's right and who arbitrates what is right?
Are you 1/10000th responsible for the death "your" tank brings to others ?you intend then to buy 1/10000th of a tank, 1/100000000th of a war plane, pay for the salary of a fraction of one soldier and the like. This is what you propose. Kinda hard to keep track of don't you think? and which things would you buy? how would you even know what to purchase?
It is likely you don't. Many roads are paid for thru property taxes or at the state level. Of course roads could easily be paid for by a use fee or if you insist on a fuel surcharge that more or less allocates cost according to use.I dont want to pay for the road in front of your house either
The reality is "federal money" is taken from local people everywhere. When they "give" states money, they must by definition take more from everybody. No free lunch from the Feds.That goes against self-preservation imo. Giving your money away for something that you don't want.
i concede federal money gets used locally but we could manage just fine without it. If people, as a society, weren't so willing to have someone "care" for them.
Don't forget that the Federal Reserve can and does also print tons of cash and creates more and more debt and we all know how that game works between the Fed and the Feds. And people continue to buy into it.The reality is "federal money" is taken from local people everywhere. When they "give" states money, they must by definition take more from everybody. No free lunch from the Feds.
can you name the countrys without a central bankDon't forget that the Federal Reserve can and does also print tons of cash and creates more and more debt and we all know how that game works between the Fed and the Feds. And people continue to buy into it.