desperation

oh so you never seen what a plant look like under a red spectrum HPS bulb . .makes sense

saw some of your post in the 600 vert club interesting now they are 6000 watts on 360(whatever hightimes article shit that is) and 2000 in vert veg . .

Dude, what is your problem? Earlier you accused me of being a hobbyist, now it's High Times article shit?
Perhaps High times does photo spreads on hobby growers! LOL
 
Actually, this whole scheme of mine went over most everyone's head. Samwell accused me of being a hobbyist so I clicked on his journal picks and found his big time grow in his basement (pic #1), I couldn't resist the yeller feller (pic #2) cause i knew Bucky would jump all over it! He's been giving me shit over a 30 yr old pic calling it a yellow twig, now he's on record talking shit about his buddy Samwell's grow! LOL

They are so easy. Reminds me of when my kids were little. They will try your patience, at times, but they aren't capable of rational debate.
 
The republicans don't have a strong candidate in Romney. I don't think anyone will deny that.

yep, and newt would be sailing to victory by now! :lol:

santorum would have it all but locked up :hump:

michelle bachmann would be america's new sweetheart :eyesmoke:

tim pawlenty would not be going to work as a lobbyist now. :lol:

herman cain would not be begging for a hosting position on fox news.

maybe if huckabee or perhaps christie had gotten in there, you might have a chance. but romney or anyone else you had to pick from was a bad, bad choice for a sad, sad party.

also, see my sig.

Yet the fact still remains that at least Romney hasn't already proven that he will fail, even when everything aligned.

are you kidding me? he raised every fee in the book as governor and then some. on top of that, he ranked 47th in job creation for his tenure and had the most debt per person of any state.

he can't even stand up to the extremists in his own party, which he now appears to be one of.

you guys are desperate if you are still embracing this romney character.
 
completely false

and they are digital ballast

Well, I'm not going to call you a liar because I'm not 100% sure. But when I used to run magnetic ballasts my pics looked just like that. Pics under my digital ballasts make the whole background a dull yellow but my plants were still green in color. Are you running digital capable bulbs?
 
yep, and newt would be sailing to victory by now! :lol:

santorum would have it all but locked up :hump:

michelle bachmann would be america's new sweetheart :eyesmoke:

tim pawlenty would not be going to work as a lobbyist now. :lol:

herman cain would not be begging for a hosting position on fox news.

maybe if huckabee or perhaps christie had gotten in there, you might have a chance. but romney or anyone else you had to pick from was a bad, bad choice for a sad, sad party.

also, see my sig.



are you kidding me? he raised every fee in the book as governor and then some. on top of that, he ranked 47th in job creation for his tenure and had the most debt per person of any state.

he can't even stand up to the extremists in his own party, which he now appears to be one of.

you guys are desperate if you are still embracing this romney character.
I'm not voting Romney... I already told you that. Put the bong down, your mind is gone.

I love when people say he did amazing in job creation. lol. You do understand that the population of the US is dynamic, not static, and always increasing... By default, even if you maintain the same % of job creation as the president of the previous term, you will create more total jobs. Yet, Obama has huge rates of unemployment. How can one have done so amazing creating jobs, yet has many more individuals out of jobs, claiming welfare and unemployment?
 
I'm not voting Romney... I already told you that. Put the bong down, your mind is gone.

I love when people say he did amazing in job creation. lol. You do understand that the population of the US is dynamic, not static, and always increasing... By default, even if you maintain the same % of job creation as the president of the previous term, you will create more total jobs. Yet, Obama has huge rates of unemployment. How can one have done so amazing creating jobs, yet has many more individuals out of jobs, claiming welfare?

when did i say anything about obama doing amazing job creation? lern 2 internet, bro.

bonus points for working "welfare" into your post.
 
Nah dude, that was Bucky that said your plant needs nitrogen, not me! LOL

LOOK \/

i'm not biased, i'll announce when neon yellow plants appear before me.

it seems that in addition to your stated hope that a ripper would make off with my plants, you also rip other people's pictures and claim them as your own.

i'm not going to let your stealing get in the way of the fact that you are pimping two neon yellow abused twigs, clayton. your mad skillz are still quite lacking.
 
i'm not biased, i'll announce when neon yellow plants appear before me.

it seems that in addition to your stated hope that a ripper would make off with my plants, you also rip other people's pictures and claim them as your own.

i'm not going to let your stealing get in the way of the fact that you are pimping two neon yellow abused twigs, clayton. your mad skillz are still quite lacking.

LMFAO Dude, you really threw Samwell's shit under the bus!
 
Well, I'm not going to call you a liar because I'm not 100% sure. But when I used to run magnetic ballasts my pics looked just like that. Pics under my digital ballasts make the whole background a dull yellow but my plants were still green in color. Are you running digital capable bulbs?


What are you saying? A magnetic ballast gives electricity some magical power and changes the bulbs output to a different spectrum? I would be fascinated to hear your views on quantum physics and parallel universes.
 
Dude, what is your problem? Earlier you accused me of being a hobbyist, now it's High Times article shit?
Perhaps High times does photo spreads on hobby growers! LOL

hey come on .. jab jab . i thought we were chill

in all honesty im sure you are a competent grower . . .just being adversarial . .about the growing . . i got to be good at more than taking hits of acid(lol No drama) . . .growing on a WEED website might as well be it
 
i'm not biased, i'll announce when neon yellow plants appear before me.

it seems that in addition to your stated hope that a ripper would make off with my plants, you also rip other people's pictures and claim them as your own.

i'm not going to let your stealing get in the way of the fact that you are pimping two neon yellow abused twigs, clayton. your mad skillz are still quite lacking.


This is Growing forum info. This is Politics. GTFO here!

J/K! Nice to read some grow talk in here occasionally.

:leaf:
 
Well, I'm not going to call you a liar because I'm not 100% sure. But when I used to run magnetic ballasts my pics looked just like that. Pics under my digital ballasts make the whole background a dull yellow but my plants were still green in color. Are you running digital capable bulbs?

do you mean bulbs at 60hrz or 50hrz ?

oh and spectrum has zero to do with ballast . . you would be a worthy adversary . . but please dont make assumptions about growing . . . i may be many things but a dubious(word of the month) knowledgeable grower i am not


ive been at it for only 7 years 4 on my own . . . . .i am by no means a expert/master(i only do indoors coco/soiless soil ) but i am quite astute
 
What are you saying? A magnetic ballast gives electricity some magical power and changes the bulbs output to a different spectrum? I would be fascinated to hear your views on quantum physics and parallel universes.

LOL Dude, you're talking out your ass, I never said one thing about a ballast changing the spectrum of an HPS light, you did. One thing I do know is, taking pics under a bulb in a digital ballast vs. a magnetic looks way different. Whether it's because of the much lower hz in the magnetic ballast that effects the filtering in the camera or whatever, but it looks way different under a digital ballast, especially when the bulb life is nearing it's end.

I take it you are a lighting engineer and an accomplished physicist, why don't you explain it to me?
 
LOL Dude, you're talking out your ass, I never said one thing about a ballast changing the spectrum of an HPS light, you did. One thing I do know is, taking pics under a bulb in a digital ballast vs. a magnetic looks way different. Whether it's because of the much lower hz in the magnetic ballast that effects the filtering in the camera or whatever, but it looks way different under a digital ballast, especially when the bulb life is nearing it's end.

I take it you are a lighting engineer and an accomplished physicist, why don't you explain it to me?

or more likely in the time between taking picture A under a magnetic ballast, and picture B under a digitally controlled ballast your camera was replaced, or the aperture settings were altered. changes to the way the camera views the light presented is a far more likely scenario than any change to the light itself given the same spectrum bulbs and light intensity.

chill out homeys, its just weed and politics. no sense getting your nuthuggers bunched up, bcky and abandonconflict got the wedgies on lockdown now that the O-man is struggling in the polls.
 
do you mean bulbs at 60hrz or 50hrz ?

oh and spectrum has zero to do with ballast . Uhh I never said it did. you would be a worthy adversary . . but please dont make assumptions about growing . . . i may be many things but a dubious(word of the month) knowledgeable grower i am not


ive been at it for only 7 years 4 on my own . . . . .i am by no means a expert/master(i only do indoors coco/soiless soil ) but i am quite astute

You won't find me talking shit about someone's grow unless they start attacking me first, and I never said a word about your skills bro, not until you took a shot at mine.
 
or more likely in the time between taking picture A under a magnetic ballast, and picture B under a digitally controlled ballast your camera was replaced, or the aperture settings were altered. changes to the way the camera views the light presented is a far more likely scenario than any change to the light itself given the same spectrum bulbs and light intensity.

chill out homeys, its just weed and politics. no sense getting your nuthuggers bunched up, bcky and abandonconflict got the wedgies on lockdown now that the O-man is struggling in the polls.

I have no idea why pics look different but I do think it has something to do with the light waves (hz).
I can go dig out an old coil over ballast and using the same camera and settings, the pictures will look different!

Perhaps we'll find out for certain once the Bad Dog quantum physicist publishes his findings on the forum for us!
 
Back
Top