blynd
Well-Known Member
SEE?? SEE?? arugment! It wasn't a lie! .... like I said, I don't like arguments about this! there is no winner! not yet! there are good games for all systems! it depends on what you're into and how you want to spend your money, not how many processors or GPUS or physics procs are inside your toy! a more "powerful" console does not mean better games..... PC is still a legitimate option as well. there is no winner.Actually the xbox 360 has 3 processors, each running @ 2.8Ghz. The PS3 has 8 processors, each running @ ~1.8Ghz. Who the fuck cares about the sound of the fan when you normally can't hear the fucker because of to much noise caused by the game. The xbox online is so much better as far as what it offers and it's online $50 a month and it's more reliable. Xbox originally had a game called Delta Force: Black Hawk Down that could fit 64 in a match. Don't talk to me about number. Haze sucked, DMC4 wasn't as good as DMC3 and wasn't exclusive to PS3, MGS4 is coming out on Xbox 360, and the first Killzone sucked balls so what makes you thing the second one is going to be better?
Although the PS3 theoretically is more powerful, it's really not right now. Sony spent billions just developing the cell processor to put in it. It's BRAND-NEW technology no one knows how to use properly therefore hindering production times and not being able to use it to it's full potential. The PS3 is fucked for right now since no one knows how to properly utilize the technology. Until the cell processor can be utilized to its fullest, Xbox 360 wins.