Desperate Democrats Deploy Racism Accusations Early to Justify Obama Loss

rollinbud

Active Member
Here comes the Washington Post today, claiming that the reason Obama “could” lose the election is racism.
I want to tell you a story about what it was like working in a consulting firm here in Chicago. We had a very nasty VP at the firm who was the old school, screaming and yelling type; the guy was a real ogre. The firm would pitch to about three big clients a month…in deals that would be 100 million+ and would typically take several months of research to put together all the proposals and materials to make a successful bid for the job. There was a lot of lobbying involved regarding the decision-makers across the table who would decide if our firm would land the deal or not. In a lot of ways, it was like a political campaign because we were one candidate out of a handful who wanted to be hired for these jobs.
I could always tell if we were going to land an account by how crazy that one VP would be in the lead up to the final meeting that would determine whether the firm was hired or not. If he felt the account slipping away, that VP would resort to all sorts of nastiness in the last few weeks to try whatever he could to not so much make the case for our firm…but to kind of scorch the Earth and make weird threats if we didn’t get our way. There was general nastiness in the office, screaming and yelling, open hostility amongst the “big bosses”, and tons of excuse-making so that the angry VP wouldn’t take any of the blame for the failure (though, to be honest, I think we lost a lot of these deals just because people didn’t want to have to work with this ogre for the next several years).
When I look at the corrupt, vintage media I actually have a sense of deja vu: the way they behave towards Obama and this election is very much like how that VP would act when he knew we were losing an account. I think dragging out “racism” as the reason people don’t support Obama is only 20% about trying to motivate the most low-information of black voters to turnout on election day “to stop the racists from preventing Obama’s second term”; 80% of the reason the Washington Post is trotting out this old canard is because they are laying the groundwork to excuse away an Obama loss. This is not something they’d be doing if they really expected him to win. What would be the point?
If Obama was really cruising to a victory the news would look a lot like the interoffice memos from when my old firm would know it was close to sealing a very big deal. There is no joy in the corrupt media these days. There is nothing like the 2008 campaign days when the newscasters were all euphoric and waxing about “Hope” and “Change” and singing high hosannas to Obama on the air. That’s all been replaced by a brittle ugliness on the part of the people delivering “the news” that is laced with accusations of racism before-the-fact to explain away the loss that’s coming for “The One”.
I hope you can see this…and can pick up on the fact that despite all their bluster, the Obama acolytes in the corrupt, vintage media are very much behaving like people who expect Obama to lose…though they very much want him to win. They’re desperately trying to salvage his bid for reelection by throwing everything they’ve got at us. It’s going to get so crazy and nasty, folks. I got out of the consulting business here in Chicago because I just couldn’t take the emotional terrorism of working in a firm where every losing bid for a project was accompanied by several weeks’ of open hostility and excuses-making or blame-shifting.
This is what we are going to see on the national stage for the next five weeks. It is going to be brutal.
*********************************************************

Read more http://hillbuzz.org/
 

thehole

New Member
I think both parties suck and should be splintered up into many groups so we have a 12 party system instead of a two. But honestly, it is about racism for many that are against Obama. I'm a gun enthusiast and sport shooter and I'm around right-wing voters all the time. I do tend to hide my progressive views just to not start conflict in my hobby but I hear people all the time talking about nigger, or black, or socialist communist pig or other nonsense like that. It's not a few, it's the majority that talk like this in the right-wing circles I'm swirling in. And being I'm a undercover lefty for lack of a better description, I can easily instigate things by blurting out some random Obama phrase about gun control or health care and it gets the racist pot going every time. If I didn't value the privacy of my sport to outsiders I could videotape hours upon hours of racist language and threats against Obama. So please, don't bash the dems for saying something that's true, bash them for something they are lying about.
And the dems are not preparing for a Obama loss in any shape or form, they are preparing to destroy Romney not only in the debates, which fat chris fat christy thinks will turn it all around for the gop, but Romney/Ryan will be destroyed in the general election.

Other then the debates and the final vote count of the general, I'm most anxious to hear Romney's concession speech.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
yeah, the democrats are desperate, what with our massive lead in the swing states. yep, that makes sense.

racist republican from texas reported for spam.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
yeah, the democrats are desperate, what with our massive lead in the swing states. yep, that makes sense.

racist republican from texas reported for spam.
He commented on the post... It was a legit posting.

He really got your goat UB eh??

I am going to have to give rollinbud some rare rep points.


Hard to call the nation racist now since Obama got elected once unless you want to admit it was by voter fraud the first time...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
He commented on the post... It was a legit posting.

He really got your goat UB eh??

I am going to have to give rollinbud some rare rep points.


Hard to call the nation racist now since Obama got elected once unless you want to admit it was by voter fraud the first time...
he didn't comment on that at all.

there are racist parts of the nation. it's hard to explain why wide swaths of the south went more red when the entire rest of the nation, even conservative strongholds, went more blue in 2008.

care to take a stab?

 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
I think both parties suck and should be splintered up into many groups so we have a 12 party system instead of a two. But honestly, it is about racism for many that are against Obama. I'm a gun enthusiast and sport shooter and I'm around right-wing voters all the time. I do tend to hide my progressive views just to not start conflict in my hobby but I hear people all the time talking about nigger, or black, or socialist communist pig or other nonsense like that. It's not a few, it's the majority that talk like this in the right-wing circles I'm swirling in. And being I'm a undercover lefty for lack of a better description, I can easily instigate things by blurting out some random Obama phrase about gun control or health care and it gets the racist pot going every time. If I didn't value the privacy of my sport to outsiders I could videotape hours upon hours of racist language and threats against Obama. So please, don't bash the dems for saying something that's true, bash them for something they are lying about.
And the dems are not preparing for a Obama loss in any shape or form, they are preparing to destroy Romney not only in the debates, which fat chris fat christy thinks will turn it all around for the gop, but Romney/Ryan will be destroyed in the general election.

Other then the debates and the final vote count of the general, I'm most anxious to hear Romney's concession speech.

since when is "socialist communist pig" a racial epithet?

barry seotoro and his policies are dead fucking wrong, and i oppose his stance on pretty much every issue he speaks on. and since disagreeing with him equals racism, then name calling and racial slurs are to be expected. if the penalty for speaking out against liberal' views is the same as calling one a nigger, then why should your average dissenter NOT call barry a nigger? it doesnt reduce his standing in your view anyhow, and it may well apply the needed vehemence to his argument. i prefer to keep the discussion on pllicy, and avoid descending intoi juvenile name calling, like "nigger" or "racist" until the opposition has demonstrated that they are incapable of understanding reasoned arguments, but not all debaters agree on when or if the racial slurs should be released.

you might notice that your own comments are primarily directed not at ideas, or arguments but at the persons making those arguments, such as:

right-wing voters
right-wing circles
racist
fat chris fat christy

your own ad hominem attacks do NOT bolster your position, nor give credence to your claim that disagreement with obama is really just secret racism.

also youre a poopie-head.
 

SahTiva

Well-Known Member
I wish they had a "reverse racism" map that showed the droves of voters that came out and voted for douchebag ONLY because he looks black. I bet it would be a lot more shocking than the one above.... they're just blaming racism for his loss because blaming Bush isn't appropriate in this situation, which is the default.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I wish they had a "reverse racism" map that showed the droves of voters that came out and voted for douchebag ONLY because he looks black. I bet it would be a lot more shocking than the one above.... they're just blaming racism for his loss because blaming Bush isn't appropriate in this situation, which is the default.
a lot of butthurt, i sense.

if you can paint a map to 270 without ohio, please show me how it's done. because romney is 9 points down in ohio.

who's desperate again?
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
There is a reason why Obama got over 90% of the black vote...

Care to take a stab at the reason?
 

patlpp

New Member
he didn't comment on that at all.

there are racist parts of the nation. it's hard to explain why wide swaths of the south went more red when the entire rest of the nation, even conservative strongholds, went more blue in 2008.

care to take a stab?

And those red squares are not really that densely populated. I see mainly rural Tennessee, Arkansas ,LA, and parts of OK. .This map really shows how Repubs don't necessarily vote party line - hence a Dem prez.
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
And those red squares are not really that densely populated. I see mainly rural Tennessee, Arkansas ,LA, and parts of OK. .This map really shows how Repubs don't necessarily vote party line - hence a Dem prez.
here is a density map for reference most of the states west of the Mississippi look deserted except the coastal pacific states.

 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
There is a reason why Obama got over 90% of the black vote...

Care to take a stab at the reason?
because democrats always get 90% or more of the black vote.

sorry if that doesn't jive with the point you were trying to make. historical fact and all.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
It seems both sides of the house are pretty desperate.

A Kenyan Muslim or a Mexican Mormon...they're not great options.
 
Top