UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you are aware this thread is based on a report detailing how reaganomics (supply side, trickle down) does not work, right?We need to get back to Reaganomics.
you are aware this thread is based on a report detailing how reaganomics (supply side, trickle down) does not work, right?We need to get back to Reaganomics.
Page 5 and they don't even accept that there is a report, so how can you expect them to know what it's about? Still trying to show them the first page of the report lmfao which they can't "see"you are aware this thread is based on a report detailing how reaganomics (supply side, trickle down) does not work, right?
you are aware this thread is based on a report detailing how reaganomics (supply side, trickle down) does not work, right?
Reads fine here, the second image is the quoted text expanded 1200pixels. View attachment 2396164 Unless you're on a phone you're trolling or fucking stupid, which is it?You are aware that trickle down government will not work right?
You are aware that Reagan fixed Jimmy Carter's mess right?
You are aware that the report you're referring to is too small to read, right?
you're mitt romney now?You are aware that trickle down government will not work right?
You are aware that Reagan fixed Jimmy Carter's mess right?
You are aware that the report you're referring to is too small to read, right?
Second link in the OP.................................. http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/documents/CRSTaxesandtheEconomy Top Rates.pdf^^ Where is the rest of it?
You didn't post those at all, quit saying you did. "i have little confidence in this, even less since the PDF wont open." Dr, Kynes. The jpgs you only just know posted, still don't contain any "study" at all, just an unreadable summary. You still have yet to post this study you claim have.Are you fucking stupid? I copied it right from the reports pdf I got from the gov website..........the one from CRS.....
View attachment 2396144 <------The report
View attachment 2396145 <----------- what I quoted
When you're ear wax is brown and crusty, it means you have shit brains.you're mitt romney now?
Wow your ignorance and stupidity amazes me.You didn't post those at all, quit saying you did. "i have little confidence in this, even less since the PDF wont open." Dr, Kynes. The jpgs you only just know posted, still don't contain any "study" at all, just an unreadable summary. You still have yet to post this study you claim have.
it was withdrawn because senate republicans got their panties in a wad and suppressed it, dumbass.The report has been debunked and withdrawn. LOL
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/domestic-taxes/265469-democrats-decry-withdrawal-of-tax-report
he is also a member of a white nationalist (neo-nazi) website called stormfront.Wow your ignorance and stupidity amazes me.
The study is posted in a .pdf which is working perfectly fine, I've tried on OSX & Windows 7 Ultimate on different browsers, works fine.
Either you are trying to be "funny" by trolling and behaving like a child or you really are so stupid you can't even opne a .pdf file.
I mean, could anyone be this stupid honestly?
The study is linked in the first post of this thread, you need to click it with your mouse for it to work, I know it's hard, but seeing as you got to rollitup without assistance one would think you could also open a .pdf?
Is that too demanding?
| #63 |
red1966 Forum Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 4 |
[HR][/HR]What makes me so sick is the ruling in Ohio which allows afro-american preachers to bus their congregations to the polls after their Sunday sermon. It's this mixing of religion and politics which the Democrats pretend to oppose until it helps them. |
|
You are talking about a report that doesn't exist. Clearly written by a Democrat partisan hack.it was withdrawn because senate republicans got their panties in a wad and suppressed it, dumbass.
FAIL.
the report does exist, was created by a non-partisan group, the CRS, and was withdrawn because republicans like yourself who still believe in the trickle down fairy pressured them to withdraw it.You are talking about a report that doesn't exist. Clearly written by a Democrat partisan hack.
Don't take my word for it, just ask the New York Times.
Reports are only withdrawn if they are full of shit. Otherwise, the CRS would stand their ground and defend it. Are you really that ignorant?
I get the jist, I'm done arguing with these ignorant morons.he is also a member of a white nationalist (neo-nazi) website called stormfront.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t909798-7/
09-02-2012, 06:48 PM#63 red1966
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4
Re: How will you vote? 2012 U.S. Presidential Elections
[HR][/HR]What makes me so sick is the ruling in Ohio which allows afro-american preachers to bus their congregations to the polls after their Sunday sermon. It's this mixing of religion and politics which the Democrats pretend to oppose until it helps them.
If I had a dollar for every time you post that huffington post garbage, I'd be a rich man. I thought this was supposed to be a "Nonpartisan" study?the report does exist, was created by a non-partisan group, the CRS, and was withdrawn because republicans like yourself who still believe in the trickle down fairy pressured them to withdraw it.
Senate Republicans applied pressure to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS) in September, successfully persuading it to withdraw a report finding that lowering marginal tax rates for the wealthiest Americans had no effect on economic growth or job creation.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...p_ref=politics