Reports: Syria has put nerve gas in bombs
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
Saltrock
Active Member
One thing the news has been talking about is, what happens when hassad is defeated and those chemical weapons are just sitting their. They are worried that the weapons could fall into rebel's hands. This is a weird situation, what do you do after he is defeated? Do you fly in a bunch of troops to protect the missiles? Who does this, the UN or USA? I personally say we bomb them hard, then send in troops while the regime is weak. I think the UN should get involved, because we have a tendency to nation build once we occupy a nation.
Peace
Salt
Peace
Salt
HMMMM isn't that the exact same scenario that happened in Iraq?
you say we just go bomb them for basically doing nothing that you could prove. all you know is what NBC has told you and all they know is what some "Official" has told them.
Guess what? The USA has gas weapons in bombs too, should we invite the rest of the world to try and kill us too?
You think Syria is going to kill you with one of their bombs? Maybe they will make a giant slingshot and lob it in your backyard? Why are you so quick to wage war against someone when they haven't done anything to you?
It is Ironic that you end your post by saying Peace, but really sounds like you want war.
haight
Well-Known Member
Hey man, you queer for his gear or what?
Saltrock
Active Member
I don't want war for sure. But this guy has killed a whole bunch of his people. The news is saying the rebels are making progress, and hassad has the potential to use his chemical missiles. So what do we do? Sit back and let him use the weapons? Or are we going to interject? I'm kind of indifferent on what we do. I think with a man up against the wall he just might get crazy and press that red button. Especially after he saw what happened to momar kadofy after the rebels got a hold of him.
Peace
Salt
Peace
Salt
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Help get another country run by "Muslim Brotherhood" types.
Genius.
Arm Al Queda against the Russians...what ever could go wrong?
It aint my fucking war, why should I pay to help people that we would otherwise just as soon kill because of their location in the world?
Qaddafi never attacked his own people, the news told you that and you believed them. Qaddafi made college free, gave everyone free healthcare and free housing. Everyone in Libya was employed. We attacked Qaddafi because he was going to create a currency backed by gold, which would have made the US Dollar second fiddle.
Do you have irrefutable proof this guy killed a massive amount of his own population? Or are you relying on MSM news for all your info?
Saltrock
Active Member
I don't care if Qaddafi killed his own people or not. The one thing I do know is his people caught him and fucked him up. So I am saying if the rebels are making progress and hassad's back is up against the wall, he will probably use chemical weapons . I don't like war, and our military men and women are on their 5th and 6th tours, they don't need another war. I would rather we stay out of other peoples business, but we are the world's police, and we feel it is our duty to help everybody, but ourselves. I personally am on the boarder isolationism.
Peace
Salt
Peace
Salt
Saltrock
Active Member
Do you have irrefutable proof that we killed Qaddafi because he tried to create a currency backed by gold, that would have made the US dollar second fiddle?
Peace
Salt
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
America has conventional, nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.
Should the rest of the world attack you because of it?
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
If it were ever put to a worldwide vote, I'd have to think of moving. Upwind. cn
no, do you have irrefutable proof that Libyans killed Ghadaffi?
Saltrock
Active Member
We are not killing our own people, our backs aren't up against the wall. Someone has to carry the big stick, might as well be us. I wouldn't want a crazy dictator to have access to all the weapons we have and use them on his people at the drop of a dime once they oppose him. You missed the point of my earlier post, which was what happens to the chemical weapons once hassad is defeated? I think we can both agree that he will end up dead at the end of all this. Do we go in and seize the weapons or do we leave it their and who ever gets it gets it?
Peace
Salt
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
The same thing that happened the 20,000+ stinger anti-aircraft missiles that disappeared when Libya was "liberated" (by Muslim extremists)...they'll "disappear".