bump for good info. +1http://www.greners.com/reflector-test.html
The question is, is space that big of an issue that you want a reflector that reflects light about half as efficiently as most of the common reflectors? I was convinced I wanted a cooltube but did some research and settled on the blockbuster. Could NOT be happier with it!
edit: am i allowed to link that?
It's a piece of glass between the light and the plants.....As the title said, I've been searching for a little while and haven't found one piece of solid information that shows cooltubes cut down on lumen output. Not just words on a computer screen, someone using a lux meter to prove this.
Yes you can link thathttp://www.greners.com/reflector-test.html
The question is, is space that big of an issue that you want a reflector that reflects light about half as efficiently as most of the common reflectors? I was convinced I wanted a cooltube but did some research and settled on the blockbuster. Could NOT be happier with it!
edit: am i allowed to link that?
Good point. I wouldn't use a cool tube (well I would never use a cool tube) unless I was growing vert. Horizontally, there are SO many better options.http://www.greners.com/reflector-test.html
The question is, is space that big of an issue that you want a reflector that reflects light about half as efficiently as most of the common reflectors? I was convinced I wanted a cooltube but did some research and settled on the blockbuster. Could NOT be happier with it!
edit: am i allowed to link that?
per my uvb meter readings there are NO hid bulbs that emit any effective amount of uvb irradianceIt's a piece of glass between the light and the plants.....
It's gonna sap a few lumens, but more importantly it blocks UV light which is a major component in trichome production.
If it means that much to you why don't your do your own research?
http://compare.ebay.com/like/221117496232?var=lv<yp=AllFixedPriceItemTypes&var=sbar
about an 8% reduction over bare bulb but any glass covered housing will do this...per nist certified 40k meterAs the title said, I've been searching for a little while and haven't found one piece of solid information that shows cooltubes cut down on lumen output. Not just words on a computer screen, someone using a lux meter to prove this.
idk about loss of lumens or par through glass, but the reason cool tubes suck compared to regular hoods that are air cool-able is down to the design of the cool tubes... they have a rather small foot print, and therefore aren't nearly as well at reflecting light as a good hood that is aircooled.. this is why you don't get the same lumen output as a normal setup..IMO,
The type of reflector you choose will be dependent upon the type of space you have, using a 1000 watt open air reflector will not work in a small growing space, but a cool tube would. For my area, anything over 250 watts and I have to go cool tube or "ductable" setup or the heat buildup will get to me.
I have read there is a small amount of light level reduction thru glass, but imo, it is overcome by the ability to maintain the environment overall by reducing the heat load by a huge margin.
Tit for Tat so to speak
Peace and Great Grows
Asmallvoice