Over 90% of worldwide scientists accept climate change, so why not Americans?

rooky1985

Active Member
ADD is one I don't like people should man up and spank their kids. Evolution is a tough one although i would like to see the Missing Link in Darwins Chain.
 

ArcticGranite

Well-Known Member
I don't even have much dog left in this fight. Your's is good tonight UB, right? Pad, I'm sure someone here may choose to prizefight and lead with his jaw. I'm happy being a content contrarian. Maybe someone will chime in they think bloodletting cures cancer.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm sure someone here may choose to prizefight and lead with his jaw. I'm happy being a content contrarian.
which is why i leave you alone. no fun to troll someone for their opinion, it only gets good when they start asserting that they know better than the climatologists publishing peer reviewed studies on the matter.
 

rooky1985

Active Member
I find evolution theories fascinating from all perspectives. I don't consider myself a bible thumper nor a scientist but it does bother me a little when people take the bible, bag vad gitta, kuran, etc. so litteral. These are all stories told to provide enlightenment on many real life situations, all which are open to your personal scenario and route of interpretation. P.S. I have a strong chin, LOL
 

ArcticGranite

Well-Known Member
which is why i leave you alone. no fun to troll someone for their opinion, it only gets good when they start asserting that they know better than the climatologists publishing peer reviewed studies on the matter.
Well thanks, I appreciate the kid gloves and a lot of your posts. But dude, some of your posts, the harsh ones, the way over the top tear a heart out harsh ones, that I sometimes chuckle at. Well, they're just harsh.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Well thanks, I appreciate the kid gloves and a lot of your posts. But dude, some of your posts, the harsh ones, the way over the top tear a heart out harsh ones, that I sometimes chuckle at. Well, they're just harsh.
if red insists on resorting to falsehoods about me, i'll go for the dead wife and kids jokes ALL DAY LONG. no shame.
 

ArcticGranite

Well-Known Member
My first introduction to your wit reading thru posts as a new member was for someone to just kill them self. I about did from choking.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
They certainly are. Politics determines what "facts" you are told, what "data" is compiled and what is discarded. The politicians, oportunists, and fear mongers can't tell you what to think, but they can fool you into false conclusions, which works just as well.
In the regular press, yes. But the context was the scientific press, which with its requirement for peer review is not quite the free-for-all. cn
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Can someone name something else that 99% of international scientists agree with that they think is false?

99% of International Communists insist Marxism is awesome. this doesntr make marxism awesoime, it just means if you ask marxists theyll all agree.

99% of scientists (even the international ones) can agree on a lot of shit, in principle. once you get down to loop gravity vs string theory, epigenetics vs regular genetics and whether or not pluto is a planet thats when the fur starts flying.

if your assertion is that 99% of all scientist believe al gore's movie is factual, or humans are causing the seas to boil and melting icepacks aredrowning polar bears you are gonna have to bring some real strong evidence to back up that claim.

even of those who agree that the climate does have trends (which 99% of scientists will agree is pretty much a surety given the ice ages we already have seen) it does not follow that they all agree what the individual causes are, and in fact even noaa doesnt make the claim that human action IS causing it, only that it could be contributing. then they punt to the politicians on the ipcc for the wacky assertions.

even climatologists (the only ones with real expertise in this feild) cant agree on whether human action has had any real impact on the global climate, they merely show small increases in co2 concentrations and speculate that this may result in warming.

the global warmin/climate change loons use the signatures of "Doctors of Psychology" and "Clinical Homeopaths" to "prove" the scientific community is on board but 197 climatologists sending a skeptical letter to the IPCC is just a ploy by the Koch brothers to sell more dirty coal to schoolchildren.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Doc,

Haven't you seen those after school specials about AGW on the Discovery Channel? Michio Kaku can't be wrong, he's Nostradamus of the scientific world. Along with all those celebrities. Think of the planet!
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
99% of International Communists insist Marxism is awesome. this doesntr make marxism awesoime, it just means if you ask marxists theyll all agree.

99% of scientists (even the international ones) can agree on a lot of shit, in principle. once you get down to loop gravity vs string theory, epigenetics vs regular genetics and whether or not pluto is a planet thats when the fur starts flying.

if your assertion is that 99% of all scientist believe al gore's movie is factual, or humans are causing the seas to boil and melting icepacks aredrowning polar bears you are gonna have to bring some real strong evidence to back up that claim.

even of those who agree that the climate does have trends (which 99% of scientists will agree is pretty much a surety given the ice ages we already have seen) it does not follow that they all agree what the individual causes are, and in fact even noaa doesnt make the claim that human action IS causing it, only that it could be contributing. then they punt to the politicians on the ipcc for the wacky assertions.

even climatologists (the only ones with real expertise in this feild) cant agree on whether human action has had any real impact on the global climate, they merely show small increases in co2 concentrations and speculate that this may result in warming.

the global warmin/climate change loons use the signatures of "Doctors of Psychology" and "Clinical Homeopaths" to "prove" the scientific community is on board but 197 climatologists sending a skeptical letter to the IPCC is just a ploy by the Koch brothers to sell more dirty coal to schoolchildren.
Exactly the type of response I predicted.

The science is real, the causes are accepted by the majority of scientists because the majority of scientists can test them themselves.


Hopefully one day the skeptics of climate change can get on board..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Exactly the type of response I predicted.

The science is real, the causes are accepted by the majority of scientists because the majority of scientists can test them themselves.


Hopefully one day the skeptics of climate change can get on board..
dr kynes makes some funny laugh laugh ha ha, but he is fucked in the head when it comes to actual worldview. have you ever heard of the john birch society? this guy would fit right in. he claims not to be a bircher though, oddly.
 

Stellah

Active Member
This threads gotten real long but I don't know if this was mentioned because I don't have time to read them all but just a year or two ago if everyone remembers correctly scientist forged, made up,lied about findings that they claimed were global warming facts/arguments... If it's good science then why lie about it
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
This threads gotten real long but I don't know if this was mentioned because I don't have time to read them all but just a year or two ago if everyone remembers correctly scientist forged, made up,lied about findings that they claimed were global warming facts/arguments... If it's good science then why lie about it
he didn't lie about it, he was exonerated.

wanna know how i know you're a poor consumer of information? you're happy to blather about the oft-reported and completely manufactured controversy but completely ignored the less reported on exoneration that occurred a few weeks later.

stellah critique delivered.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
he didn't lie about it, he was exonerated.

wanna know how i know you're a poor consumer of information? you're happy to blather about the oft-reported and completely manufactured controversy but completely ignored the less reported on exoneration that occurred a few weeks later.

stellah critique delivered.
not being run out of town on a rail, or lynched in the faculty dining room is not "exonerated"

too many clowns got too deep into the shit with that scandal, and the truth is there is too much politics and not enough science in "Anthropogenic Global Climate Change" for the theory to be salvaged (much les the reputations of those involved) without extensive rewriting of history. nobody in the academic establishment likes seeing their work destroyed by a couple assholes who just want to "punch it up a little, you know, give it that X Factor" science portrays itself as sober, and logical, the reality is theres too many assclowns pulling the strings to get grant money and too many slick shysters pushing for the cheap popularity and notoriety you get from claiming the apocalypse is coming.

Nibiru the invisible brown dwarf star is not gonna cause the poles tot reverse resulting in (????) people's GPS navigators sending them to paramus new jersey instead of panama city for spring break. likewise when serious scientists get suckered in with fake data they DONT WANT IT ADVERTISED or they too might wind up spending their nights lecturing the aluminium foil hat club on Coast To Coast AM with George Nourry (sorry michio kaku, you made your bed,, you gots to lay in it)

meanwhile bucky, you are a FABULOUS consumer of information. you eat the garbage youre fed, and pass it out into your posts on this forum. come spring im gonna shovel about 300 lb of your posts into my tomatoe patch. it's gonna be a bumper crop come summer.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
not being run out of town on a rail, or lynched in the faculty dining room is not "exonerated" and some other self masturbatory nonsense.
ex·on·er·ate (
g-z
n
-r
t
)tr.v. ex·on·er·at·ed, ex·on·er·at·ing, ex·on·er·ates 1. To free from blame.
2. To free from a responsibility, obligation, or task.
 
Top