Time to reject the Malthusian notion that our lives must be justified by drudgery.

abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
A UN estimate was published. The cost to feed the entire world is 195 billion, including logistics and would decrease at a rate outpacing population growth. This is less than what the world spends treating obesity.

Stop the madness, feed the hungry.
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
abandonconflict said:
A UN estimate was published. The cost to feed the entire world is 195 billion, including logistics and would decrease at a rate outpacing population growth. This is less than what the world spends treating obesity.

Stop the madness, feed the hungry.
Click to expand...
I read a quote somewhere by a UN spokesman who said it's not we can't feed the hungry, the problem is they can't pay for it
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Clearly we need to create jobs. The last thing we want is for the work to be done, then nobody would be able to buy anything.
 
chewberto

chewberto

Well-Known Member
Yeah Billy Gates can spend billions on vaccinating a whole african continent but cant get them a fucking cheeseburger to cover those protruding ribs... a lot of thing just don't make sense.... because its not part of a logical plan....its part of domination....bwahahahahahhahahahahahha
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
chewberto said:
Yeah Billy Gates can spend billions on vaccinating a whole african continent but cant get them a fucking cheeseburger to cover those protruding ribs... a lot of thing just don't make sense.... because its not part of a logical plan....its part of domination....bwahahahahahhahahahahahha
Click to expand...
:lol: I think he's rectified that problem... He's got a whole bunch of monsanto shares and is pushing GMO as the answer to famine in Africom.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
A UN estimate was published. The cost to feed the entire world is 195 billion, including logistics and would decrease at a rate outpacing population growth. This is less than what the world spends treating obesity.

Stop the madness, feed the hungry.
Click to expand...
You probably need to inflate that figure by about 100 times to account for graft and empire building.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
I read a quote somewhere by a UN spokesman who said it's not we can't feed the hungry, the problem is they can't pay for it
Click to expand...
We feed the hungry. We have an economy that is 3x the next largest. We send food aid by the meaga-ton. The problem this UN droid is referring to, we can't afford the graft and corruption, starting at the UN, that prevents to aid from reaching the needy. That's what we can't afford, the UN.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
We feed the hungry. We have an economy that is 3x the next largest. We send food aid by the meaga-ton. The problem this UN droid is referring to, we can't afford the graft and corruption, starting at the UN, that prevents to aid from reaching the needy. That's what we can't afford, the UN.
Click to expand...
We are the source of the graft and corruption. We make mockery of international law.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
No doubt about that. Defense is for the defense of food and water, primarily. It is not feeding the hungry by all the food going to the despots.

But, what does that have to do with it? That means less jobs in the US. And it will mean more pressure on the private sector un-employment.

So, Agenda has the pick and choose, instead of Real. All theory, no beef. You want the sequester, then?
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
No, I mean creating jobs in general. It is a retarded concept. That is what I mean by rejecting the Malthusian idea that our lives have to be justified.
Click to expand...
The private sector is being plowed under. Only the govt boondoggle is growing. We pay taxes to employ people for nothing. People who are forced to join public sector unions with an anti-commerce Agenda.

And I'm not sure what what this Agenda Theory about drudgery means. Is it Marxism?

Or is it French?
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
This must be a hard concept for you to wrap your head around. I'll try to make it even more simple for ya.

The Malthusian idea that everyone's existence must be justified by meaningless employment is retarded.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
This must be a hard concept for you to wrap your head around. I'll try to make it even more simple for ya.

The Malthusian idea that everyone's existence must be justified by meaningless employment is retarded.
Click to expand...
Employment does not have to be meaningless, or drudgery. The idea that you can simply draw a check because you are alive is not going to sell well to those who produce and pay taxes.

I sympathize with hating work that is not interesting. Get educated in a field that interests you, and that is marketable.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Employment does not have to be meaningless, or drudgery. The idea that you can simply draw a check because you are alive is not going to sell well to those who produce and pay taxes.

I sympathize with hating work that is not interesting. Get educated in a field that interests you, and that is marketable.
Click to expand...
Deciphering...

"My existence is justified, change the direction you have chosen since it does not justify your existence."
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
We are the source of the graft and corruption. We make mockery of international law.
Click to expand...
International Law would not even exist without the USA protecting the Sea Lanes and conducting local intervention. The World Court is the mockery. Subjecting US Forces to Sharia is not going to happen. You are mocking the USA, is all.

In the scope of history how could the USA be the source of corruption? That's in the heart of man.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
International Law would not even exist without the USA protecting the Sea Lanes and conducting local intervention. The World Court is the mockery. Subjecting US Forces to Sharia is not going to happen. You are mocking the USA, is all.

In the scope of history how could the USA be the source of corruption? That's in the heart of man.
Click to expand...
In the scope of history, the USA is the greatest oppressor of the third world, having surpassed the British Empire in colonial hegemony.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top