Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
So I wake up today and find 24 likes from DNA. I have a dilemma. I don't know if I should feel flattered or get a restraining order.
Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013
- Thread starter DNAprotection
- Start date
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
lol no just a New Years gift for your participation in the evolution of this human DNA thread...all posts got stars on thars...
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
lol! Does that explain the traceless Like bombing I found this morning? cn
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
I got 76 new likes from him.
Its good to see he has nothing better to do than post Bills noone supports (he still can't figure out the whole Bill/Act thing) and sit on his computer "liking" every post like some kind of savant.
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
Everything is relative and relevant Frank even you, for example some folks like cn and CS got stars because they are special, and some folks got stars because they are special ed...your in the second category Frank...
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
The stars on thars reflect an indiscriminate = 'lack of judgement' lol by the numbers issuance of stars to all who posted here...if I had been gene splicing I might have chosen (not saying I would have) to cut out the distribution of stars to certain posters.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
I'm not the one who sat there and liked 45 pages of posts that were calling me stupid...
Just saying.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Ahh, so the people who agreed with you are cool, and the ones that disagreed you ignored their informed and relevant comments and called them stupid?
I even called a truce on the flaming you to see if you could have an actual discussion, you couldn't.
Seriously, grow up.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Let me explain Like bombing. I woke up with 56 new Likes but only three Liked posts. That means somebody Liked and Unliked a post of mine 53 times. This little maneuver was taught to me by one of this forum's most prolific and creative trolls.
I will demonstrate, but (as is my nature and calling) in moderation.
cn
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
Not sure I understand cn?Let me explain Like bombing. I woke up with 56 new Likes but only three Liked posts. That means somebody Liked and Unliked a post of mine 53 times. This little maneuver was taught to me by one of this forum's most prolific and creative trolls.
I will demonstrate, but (as is my nature and calling) in moderation.
When I 'liked', I just 'liked' not unliked?
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
That exonerates you. My playful tormentor was another.
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
Wrong Frank, I can only guess your referring to cn's posts and I have responded in kind to such.
Where in the all of this thread have I ever called anyone 'stupid'? I haven't Frank,
that's a sweat hog debate team tactic and you know that as well as any sweat hog.
Stop crying Frank and take your stars like a man.
Take the poll challenge Frank, I double dare ya lol...
ps...you called a truce?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Yep, I said I'd stop trolling if you'd have an honest discussion, you responded with more of the same so I called it off.Wrong Frank, I can only guess your referring to cn's posts and I have responded in kind to such.
Where in the all of this thread have I ever called anyone 'stupid'? I haven't Frank,
that's a sweat hog debate team tactic and you know that as well as any sweat hog.
Stop crying Frank and take your stars like a man.
Take the poll challenge Frank, I double dare ya lol...
ps...you called a truce?
As Iv said before, I'm done with the topic.
That leaves me with just this to say... you're retarded.
Btw your poll means shit, if you re-posted it now and people actually read our content before voting I know it would go the other way.
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
Frank all you have said to me over and over along with pics lol is stuff like this "you're retarded", so I have responded in kind, just more kind and with humorous intent.
Twice before to be exact is the number of times you claimed you were done here as a fact and look how that panned out Frank.
As far as the poll goes, your very confident Frank so why not just back it up with action?
In terms of what you call a 'truce', I would be more than pleased to discuss with you any topic if that's what you really wanted to do Frank. but you have made clear by your postings that you were just here to play...so I obliged.
OGEvilgenius
Well-Known Member
Despite DD's blatantly dishonest deception, Monsanto was a leader in pro DDT propaganda.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Monsanto has NOTHING TO DO with the Bill posted by the OP, in truth it's a blanket ban on all GMO's for the State of California.
Dont believe his paranoid hyperbole, he's mis-selling a Bill to suit his personal agenda.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Why would they champion the competition's product? 'Twas Geigy, no? cn
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
I won't be happy until: natural and artificial flavors, corn syrup, color numbers and added msg (as an extract too), are all banned. Only if used in food.
If this bill was only a ban on GMO for things we ingest(drink, eat, smoke, inject, etc) I'd be 100% for it.
If this bill was only a ban on GMO for things we ingest(drink, eat, smoke, inject, etc) I'd be 100% for it.
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
Frank aside from your showing up again in spite of your pledge as 'fact' that you were not going to do so, and regardless of your usual M.O. and inaccurate assumptions, how in the world could you possibly state that the proposed ballot measure has nothing to do with Monsanto?
That could be the wackiest or most inaccurate thing you've written so far.
I wonder what corporation would be more opposed to this proposal Frank? Maybe the corporation for public broadcasting sounds more plausible to you?
Of course your assertion the proposed measure would be a "blanket ban on all GMO's for the State of California" is again and also inaccurate Frank because of section 3(c)...I thought we already had this talk?
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
The thing for me though CS is that human health and safety is not my only concern, there are great possible risks of unforeseen consequences to the rest of nature.
When our knowledge and understanding is better, then such technologies might be 'ready for prime time', but at this point we are for the most part guessing all the way, so from my view its better to approach with extreme caution.