Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
So I wake up today and find 24 likes from DNA. I have a dilemma. I don't know if I should feel flattered or get a restraining order.
lol no just a New Years gift for your participation in the evolution of this human DNA thread...all posts got stars on thars...So I wake up today and find 24 likes from DNA. I have a dilemma. I don't know if I should feel flattered or get a restraining order.
I got 76 new likes from him.lol! Does that explain the traceless Like bombing I found this morning? cn
Everything is relative and relevant Frank even you, for example some folks like cn and CS got stars because they are special, and some folks got stars because they are special ed...your in the second category Frank...I got 76 new likes from him.
Its good to see he has nothing better to do than post Bills noone supports (he still can't figure out the whole Bill/Act thing) and sit on his computer "liking" every post like some kind of savant.
The stars on thars reflect an indiscriminate = 'lack of judgement' lol by the numbers issuance of stars to all who posted here...if I had been gene splicing I might have chosen (not saying I would have) to cut out the distribution of stars to certain posters.lol! Does that explain the traceless Like bombing I found this morning? cn
I'm not the one who sat there and liked 45 pages of posts that were calling me stupid...Everything is relative and relevant Frank even you, for example some folks like cn and CS got stars because they are special, and some folks got stars because they are special ed...your in the second category Frank...
Ahh, so the people who agreed with you are cool, and the ones that disagreed you ignored their informed and relevant comments and called them stupid?Everything is relative and relevant Frank even you, for example some folks like cn and CS got stars because they are special, and some folks got stars because they are special ed...your in the second category Frank...
Let me explain Like bombing. I woke up with 56 new Likes but only three Liked posts. That means somebody Liked and Unliked a post of mine 53 times. This little maneuver was taught to me by one of this forum's most prolific and creative trolls.The stars on thars reflect an indiscriminate = 'lack of judgement' lol by the numbers issuance of stars to all who posted here...if I had been gene splicing I might have chosen (not saying I would have) to cut out the distribution of stars to certain posters.
Not sure I understand cn?Let me explain Like bombing. I woke up with 56 new Likes but only three Liked posts. That means somebody Liked and Unliked a post of mine 53 times. This little maneuver was taught to me by one of this forum's most prolific and creative trolls.
I will demonstrate, but (as is my nature and calling) in moderation. cn
That exonerates you. My playful tormentor was another.Not sure I understand cn?
When I 'liked', I just 'liked' not unliked?
Wrong Frank, I can only guess your referring to cn's posts and I have responded in kind to such.Ahh, so the people who agreed with you are cool, and the ones that disagreed you ignored their informed and relevant comments and called them stupid?
I even called a truce on the flaming you to see if you could have an actual discussion, you couldn't.
Seriously, grow up.
Yep, I said I'd stop trolling if you'd have an honest discussion, you responded with more of the same so I called it off.Wrong Frank, I can only guess your referring to cn's posts and I have responded in kind to such.
Where in the all of this thread have I ever called anyone 'stupid'? I haven't Frank,
that's a sweat hog debate team tactic and you know that as well as any sweat hog.
Stop crying Frank and take your stars like a man.
Take the poll challenge Frank, I double dare ya lol...
ps...you called a truce?
Frank all you have said to me over and over along with pics lol is stuff like this "you're retarded", so I have responded in kind, just more kind and with humorous intent.Yep, I said I'd stop trolling if you'd have an honest discussion, you responded with more of the same so I called it off.
As Iv said before, I'm done with the topic.
That leaves me with just this to say... you're retarded.
Btw your poll means shit, if you re-posted it now and people actually read our content before voting I know it would go the other way.
Despite DD's blatantly dishonest deception, Monsanto was a leader in pro DDT propaganda.And they thought DDT was a godsend because Monsanto put out deliberately misleading studies indicating it's safety. Kind of just like what's happening today.
In 99 they were convicted of negligence, outrage, wantonness, nuisance, and trespass as well as ordered to pay 700,000,000 to the residents of Anniston Alabama because they had poisoned the hell out of them with PCBs.
What exactly is outrage in Alabama law? It describes actions so outrageous in character and extreme in degree as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency so as to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in civilized society.
Definitely a trustworthy company. Let's take their studies at face value as they have an honest history. I'm even more pleased that their representatives embody the most powerful positions at the FDA as well.
Monsanto has NOTHING TO DO with the Bill posted by the OP, in truth it's a blanket ban on all GMO's for the State of California.Despite DD's blatantly dishonest deception, Monsanto was a leader in pro DDT propaganda.
Why would they champion the competition's product? 'Twas Geigy, no? cnDespite DD's blatantly dishonest deception, Monsanto was a leader in pro DDT propaganda.
Frank aside from your showing up again in spite of your pledge as 'fact' that you were not going to do so, and regardless of your usual M.O. and inaccurate assumptions, how in the world could you possibly state that the proposed ballot measure has nothing to do with Monsanto?Monsanto has NOTHING TO DO with the Bill posted by the OP, in truth it's a blanket ban on all GMO's for the State of California.
Dont believe his paranoid hyperbole, he's mis-selling a Bill to suit his personal agenda.
The thing for me though CS is that human health and safety is not my only concern, there are great possible risks of unforeseen consequences to the rest of nature.I won't be happy until: natural and artificial flavors, corn syrup, color numbers and added msg (as an extract too), are all banned. Only if used in food.
If this bill was only a ban on GMO for things we ingest(drink, eat, smoke, inject, etc) I'd be 100% for it.