Anti cannabis site (populartechnology AKA poptech)

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
while researching this morning i came across this site

populartechnology.net/2008/12/anti-marijuana-resource.html

normally it would be something i ignore for the nonsense it is

but seeing the work thats gone into it i would like to celebrate one of our newest members work

"Marijuana is a very dangerous drug that has been propagandized as "safe" by weak minded idiots. The reality is marijuana is an addictive drug that can cause brain damage, cancer, gum disease, heart disease, infertility, lung disease, obesity, pregnancy failure, viral infections and doubles the risk of car accidents.""

andrew seeing as how you've graced this site how abouts you give us some comment on this
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
while researching this morning i came across this site

populartechnology.net/2008/12/anti-marijuana-resource.html

normally it would be something i ignore for the nonsense it is

but seeing the work thats gone into it i would like to celebrate one of our newest members work

"Marijuana is a very dangerous drug that has been propagandized as "safe" by weak minded idiots. The reality is marijuana is an addictive drug that can cause brain damage, cancer, gum disease, heart disease, infertility, lung disease, obesity, pregnancy failure, viral infections and doubles the risk of car accidents.""

andrew seeing as how you've graced this site how abouts you give us some comment on this
Half his sources are newspaper articles...

LOL.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
No doubt they are turning against us, again. Next will be a UN survey of "scientists."
Then the Newz-joke will be shouting ....97% of scientist agree. Cannabis is wrong.

--------------------
Do you believe there is wrong in Cannabis?

YES or NO
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
So when they do turn, are you guys gonna just go back to cuffing up, or actually start fighting back?

I never thought that asking nice, regardless of how many facts were brought to the table, would ever work on a federal level.
 

Moldy

Well-Known Member
"Weak minded idots" Yeah like Carl Sagen, fuck that site. Of course they are taking money from someone interested in keeping weed illegal. One lie leads to another and those fucking douchers have nothing left. It's over! Weed won, you lost, get over it.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
So when they do turn, are you guys gonna just go back to cuffing up, or actually start fighting back?

I never thought that asking nice, regardless of how many facts were brought to the table, would ever work on a federal level.
What are you talking about, fighting back? The big problem is the hippy shit heads trying to push it in the face of the Feds. Now Washington, the state, is coming up with a test for driver intoxication. Bad science, but it will be another nail for the Feds. Backlash.

Unfortunately, the same attitude that got it banned in the 30s, is being forced again, on the politicians. We were quietly electing people who grew up on pot.

But, when they see this counter culture bullshit, in these times of Terror, they want to protect our culture from that. Same as in the 60s. I was there. The communist manifesto took over from the free love movement and repression happens.

In Netherlands, the conservatives are back in power, and repression is happening. Why? To stop the flood of euro-trash
from being such fuck ups in their country. Backlash.

We foul ourselves, just goofing around, Any fight, we are already behind at the State level, contrary to popular belief. It is creating backlash.

In CO, it is an up-leveled, Ag inspection. All govt records, etc. Already the big guys are forcing out the little guys by political contribution. That buys selective prosecution. But, the Fed will make sure is will never get big. When it consolidates in CO, big growers will be going to prison for Federal Tax evasion.

In CA at least, they are maintaining the balance, medical only. Legal for recreation, in States will be doomed by the Feds, in nefarious ways.

Remember the first rule of grow. Tell no one. Keep it medical, not legal. It is our only chance, I think.
 

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
while researching this morning i came across this site

populartechnology.net/2008/12/anti-marijuana-resource.html

normally it would be something i ignore for the nonsense it is

but seeing the work thats gone into it i would like to celebrate one of our newest members work

"Marijuana is a very dangerous drug that has been propagandized as "safe" by weak minded idiots. The reality is marijuana is an addictive drug that can cause brain damage, cancer, gum disease, heart disease, infertility, lung disease, obesity, pregnancy failure, viral infections and doubles the risk of car accidents.""

andrew seeing as how you've graced this site how abouts you give us some comment on this
Tw, how in the world is it that you don't connect the dots on this kind of stuff?
There is a count down to new federal laws happening and if you were Monsanto lets say and knowing how you had manipulated the corn markets for example, wouldn't it make sense to you to do the same with cannabis only even more so?
Corn didn't start from a position of being illegal.
If corporate interests can keep naturally occurring varieties of cannabis to be considered 'dangerous' and schedule 1 while they step forward with genetically engineered varieties or the promise of such, then congress could act in response to the wa,co laws by passing federal laws that would require states to conform to the new regulated 'source' of the seed etc...
Its simply 'good' business practice for biotech leaders like Monsanto.
Shoot for it all is what I would do if I were them right now, in other words the best case business scenario in a cut throat capitalist culture.
It only makes sense that a corps like Monsanto would also fund efforts like "andrew"s etc in the count down to such laws.
Its exactly the tactics of Hurst and DuPont et al back in the count down to the marijuana tax act.
After the tax act was passed some of those same corporate interests were involved with the USDA's effort to contract farmers and supply hemp seed to be grown for the war effort in 1942, and one had to contact and grow federal approved/distributed seed.
Now with patentable genetics in reach, the corporate and federal interests could take over the entire source of 'legal' seed to be then supplied to the states who desire to use cannabis in whatever way...
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Tw, how in the world is it that you don't connect the dots on this kind of stuff?
There is a count down to new federal laws happening and if you were Monsanto lets say and knowing how you had manipulated the corn markets for example, wouldn't it make sense to you to do the same with cannabis only even more so?
Corn didn't start from a position of being illegal.
If corporate interests can keep naturally occurring varieties of cannabis to be considered 'dangerous' and schedule 1 while they step forward with genetically engineered varieties or the promise of such, then congress could act in response to the wa,co laws by passing federal laws that would require states to conform to the new regulated 'source' of the seed etc...
Its simply 'good' business practice for biotech leaders like Monsanto.
Shoot for it all is what I would do if I were them right now, in other words the best case business scenario in a cut throat capitalist culture.
It only makes sense that a corps like Monsanto would also fund efforts like "andrew"s etc in the count down to such laws.
Its exactly the tactics of Hurst and DuPont et al back in the count down to the marijuana tax act.
After the tax act was passed some of those same corporate interests were involved with the USDA's effort to contract farmers and supply hemp seed to be grown for the war effort in 1942, and one had to contact and grow federal approved/distributed seed.
Now with patentable genetics in reach, the corporate and federal interests could take over the entire source of 'legal' seed to be then supplied to the states who desire to use cannabis in whatever way...
The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

Bet the stocks of tinfoil are always low in your local store, right GAYprotection?
 

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
Tw, how in the world is it that you don't connect the dots on this kind of stuff?
There is a count down to new federal laws happening and if you were Monsanto lets say and knowing how you had manipulated the corn markets for example, wouldn't it make sense to you to do the same with cannabis only even more so?
Corn didn't start from a position of being illegal.
If corporate interests can keep naturally occurring varieties of cannabis to be considered 'dangerous' and schedule 1 while they step forward with genetically engineered varieties or the promise of such, then congress could act in response to the wa,co laws by passing federal laws that would require states to conform to the new regulated 'source' of the seed etc...
Its simply 'good' business practice for biotech leaders like Monsanto.
Shoot for it all is what I would do if I were them right now, in other words the best case business scenario in a cut throat capitalist culture.
It only makes sense that a corps like Monsanto would also fund efforts like "andrew"s etc in the count down to such laws.
Its exactly the tactics of Hurst and DuPont et al back in the count down to the marijuana tax act.
After the tax act was passed some of those same corporate interests were involved with the USDA's effort to contract farmers and supply hemp seed to be grown for the war effort in 1942, and one had to contact and grow federal approved/distributed seed.
Now with patentable genetics in reach, the corporate and federal interests could take over the entire source of 'legal' seed to be then supplied to the states who desire to use cannabis in whatever way...
You have your "andrew"s who are probably funded by corpses like Monsanto and then you've got you're Frank's...

The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

Bet the stocks of tinfoil are always low in your local store, right GAYprotection?
who clearly should be...
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
That article is pretty damning. Maybe we ARE all stupid, addled, impotent, dangerous killers with heart and lung disease.


Then again - one of the authors says " There is nothing wrong with FOX News and their news reporting, those stories are accurate"
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
If the UN says so, and they have. Muslims are offended. That's the wrong.
thats a funny definition

when did the un say bacon was wrong?

unless i am deliberately trying to offend someone it matters nothing to me if someone is offended by my actions

eating a bacon cheeseburger infront of muslims is fine but slapping them round the face with a ham might be crossing the line
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
thats a funny definition

when did the un say bacon was wrong?

unless i am deliberately trying to offend someone it matters nothing to me if someone is offended by my actions

eating a bacon cheeseburger infront of muslims is fine but slapping them round the face with a ham might be crossing the line
How about an 8 lb ham in bone? Easy swing, hard landing. :) IAC, in Sharia, pork is blaspheme. In the UN Council on Human Rights, there are enough Muslims represented that Blaspheme is considered a Violation of Rights. It is not yet legally recognized outside the emerging Caliphate.

This UN Council is pushing for that here. And the Left has been leading the charge for a long time in Schools backed up by Psychologists.

In my lifetime, suddenly, Words Matter. And part of the new world order Agenda, Blaspheme is prohibited. It is slow and sure work. In a real way, McCarthy was correct. Our means of entertainment and education have sold out, wittingly and not so much to forces against our Constitution. Insurrection is already happening. A kind of psycho war of emotion tampering.

Our bleeding heart is our weakness.

It is a grind and the Left seems to be winning. BTW, the Gestapo calls itself the Muslim Brotherhood, these days. Not left or right....they are non-secular, Sharia usurped, for power.
 
Top