lightbeam gl700...80W...$2500..thats cheap...
this one works w/o remote phosphor.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI_DeTaUWqw
...In fact the whole panel of 24 leds becomes a "multi-chip -24 pcs - " huge led ....Why not use multi chip LED's? More lumens/cm^2 which is especially useful when Red phosphor (and PolarKote, I guess) is so expensive. You can have custom 50W LED chips made relatively cheaply with, say, 4 x 380nm, 23 x 440nm, and 23 x 460nm. You could even throw some 660nm's in there, the phosphor lens shouldn't hurt their efficiency too much.
This is a cpu copper heatsink ....Just thought these were really "cool." Expensive, but cool. I know it's dumb, you can get an "Astir"-type heat sink for much cheaper and achieve the same results, but...
http://www.xoxide.com/nofancr-95cicepipefanlesscpucooler-copper.html?gclid=CNu_iJXk2rQCFQmmPAod5XMAoQ
For 50W'ers these can perform passive, for 100W'ers you'll need a fan.
http://www.amazon.com/Supermicro-SNK-P0038P-Chassis/dp/B002DPD09I
I found one for $10 free shipping and couldn't pass it up. Dunno if I wanna pair it with a 50W Blue chip + 2700K ChromaLit remote phosphor, or a custom spectrum 440nm/460nm 2395K Warm White + 630nm/660nm 100W chip. I've got enough stuff to make three Astir-type panels (about 30W each, I believe, less WW/NW more 630nm/660nm) so one could go to sustaining a mother while the other two and the hypothetical 50W-100W chip could be in the other tent for 12-12 action.
.62W/$1 for the 50W remote phosphor, .74W/$1 for the custom 100W (before fan and DC PSU), .81W/$1 for a 100W remote phosphor (before fan and DC PSU). Leaning towards custom spectrum 100W, but then again 1.43W/$1 for a standard 100W Warm White chip is pretty crazy.
I was trying to respond after watching the medical led video, but RIU went down. Simple one button push to change the diodes from CW> NW>WW. AwesomeGuod ,I think -not sure though- that this lights are of 8 arrays x 80 Watts each array ...640 Watts total ...
I think ..
BTW ,that light in the vid, is jaw-dropping .....
Why there aren't any lights for us ,like that ?
could those chips be mounted on a dome distributing the light in a much wider pattern?...In fact the whole panel of 24 leds becomes a "multi-chip -24 pcs - " huge led ....
Nice idea ,with the added reds underneath rem.phosp. screen ...
This could be usefull for vertical growing around this domecould those chips be mounted on a dome distributing the light in a much wider pattern?
Easy to control which will be off and which on ...Light up the screens ,where is needed ....Or at max ....
Can have dimming control & timer , to simulate morning/evening effects ...
Can also simulate " East(rise) -Zenith-West (set ) " light power orientation .....
And possibly more ...
3D growth light
http://buymarijuanaseeds.com/community/threads/needed-lighting-concepts-to-develop-led-grow-lights.117599/page-2It happened the same when vegging with CFLs, that often are very bluish. When I used them, I noticed I got better growth rates without more strectchig using 1 6500K and 1 2700K instead of using 2 6500K.
For blooming, bluish spectrum works very well too. Cannabis prefers a little reddish spectrum of bloom (actually, very reddish spectrums) over blueish one, but its not good to exaggerate it. It does well with more blue too. Attending to yield, clearly reddish spectrums produces more, probably because there is more photons (for same energy emitted, it hold more photons as longer is their wavelength). But using more blue affect quality of end product. As its very subjective, some people prefer to use blueish spectrum on bloom or some stages of it, and others not.
But what is true is reddish spectrums usually produces more in bloom.
My thought was you could use fewer leds, but you could be rightI think Astir panels are small enough to negate the need for the slight doming effect. Also, larger panels seem to be migrating towards the "module" approach like Apollo. Just my thought on the subject.