I was wondering the same. Universal healthcare won't do much good if the difficult, expensive procedures are informally rationed by making them un-or underavailable. cn
In some provinces the wait times are lengthy for certain procedures. People can opt to buy supplemental insurance and skip the lines. Things are prioritized, though, and nobody is dying waiting for heart surgery.
Canadians have a longer life expectancy than Americans. I know I can't base my argument strictly on that fact alone, but if the health care system were so bad, and people were keeling over while waiting years for life saving surgeries, then I can't imagine life expectancies would be what they are.
You also have to consider that here in America you eliminate roughly 50 million people from the "lines" because they can't afford health care. I guess the trade off is covering everyone, and having people *possibly* wait a little longer for their MRI on their knee in Canada, or only treating people that can afford it here in America.
Personally, I think it's embarrassing in a country as wealthy as America is to deny people basic health care because they don't have the money. 45,000 people die each year in America due to no health coverage.
No system is perfect, but I feel the system here is flawed beyond all others.