But with the wars that you didn't support during bush and now support with obama, you do see a reason for military to have them? To kill innocent people, right?
If they come for your guns, do you have a responsibility to fight?
- Thread starter zambonic
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how smart would it be to die in vain? that's kind of stupid.
not only do you get nothing out of it, you're dead to boot.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i think it's a good idea for the military to have military grade weapons.
The military uses a beretta matte 92fs handgun shall those be banned as well? Seals teams use remington model 700 (bolt action) what about those?
So if the military can start bull shit wars over seas, can they start one right here at home? And if they can, do you still not see a reason for people to have them?
Pointing out mis-spelled words doesn't make you argument more valid ( I hope you know that).
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
are they made for wiping out people en masse in the quickest fashion possible? or are they more weapons of self defense?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
*misspelled
*your
It doesn't matter, as I said before, you don't know the point of guerrilla warfare.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i know the point of it, you still wouldn't stand a chance though.
Touche... to bad you would flea your grammar skills would be invaluable in a time of need, kind of like my guns LOL
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
For the dragon - the cufflink. Pencils in tiny crossbows are the sovereign remedy for vampire assault. cn
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
That is against the law. cn
All weapons could be construed as a weapon of self defense, my point is where is the line drawn? Ofcourse people would stand a chance, Nukes? Why would the government damage it's biggest investment U.S.A., this is a laughable suggestion.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
at self defense.
there's no reason for a civilian to have a weapon that is designed to wipe out as many humans as quickly as possible.
an insurrection is more of a liability than an asset.
I was thinking of using the pencil as a wand and going Harry Potter on that dragons ass.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
No dichotomy imo. They are the same.
N.b. you spoke about "military-grade weapons" earlier. The guns used at Sandy Hook were not "military grade" since they were "assault weapons" i.e. civilian-allowed guns the media seem to dislike. A true military-grade gun of that size and type would be a proper assault rifle, which would have burst and full on the selector as well as safe and semi-auto. And a bayonet. Assault rifles gots bayonets. cn
All weapons have evolved to be more efficient killing machines.