Why flushing is a myth yes and no explained!

[MrStickyScissors]

i simply hang the plants upside down in walk in closets. i cut off the fan leaves simply to save time when trimming i have left them on no difference in taste maybe a tad bit quicker on the dry. i keep a small fan circulating in the closet for 6 days . then i trim. no jars its baged up and brought to the club. i then tell them it cured in jars for 2 weeks and charge them more lol silly

 

[MrStickyScissors]

but you do got to burp the bags. just for 2 or 3 days if you have it that long. make sure if its fresh even if it dry leave the bag open on your way to vend when you get there suck all the air out the bag and close it when they open it to check it it will give them a nice little slap in the nose

 

[Ninjabowler]

This one is better. I have taken 2 years of college chemistry. Bio and organic chemistry is difficult. I don't even understand all of it.
http://www.jbc.org/content/273/25/15335.full

Its an expirement on peas and canola where they are centrifugeing plant matter to extract substances in solution to test chlorophyll break down. Doesnt really mention anywhere in it if the peas were flushed with water prior to the expiremen taking place, lol nor is there a comparison even mentioned. Its pretty much just someones analisis of pureed plant matter as it decays and chlorophyll degades.
I think a better study type to relate the flushing question to would be on extraction of harmfull elements by use of plants in contaminated areas. At least theres measurment of metals and elements of our concern.

 

[Nightmarecreature]

3x3 or 4x4 grow tent closed off with drying plants inside the rh will raise alot and slow your drying process

I do this but I pour water on the ground. The humidity where I'm at is in the low 20's.

 

[Ninjabowler]

you only need to flush if you have been feeding heavily(organic or inorganic), towards the end, there is no reason to flush during the life time of a plant unless your using synthetics and going on beyond 3-4 months of growing it.

you should flush at the end though especially if you feed heavily and not what the plant needs and uses,which most of you do if you follow the instuctions on the bottles for the most part(some, very few, but some are labeled well)
here is a small list of some of chemical ferts when overly fed would ideally need flushed out, most inorganic fertilizer contain one or more of these, because they are cheaper than other chemical forms of nutrition.
Ammonium Sulphate

This fertilizer type comes in a white crystalline salt form, containing 20 to 21% ammonia cal nitrogen. It is easy to handle and it stores well under dry conditions. However, during the rainy season, it sometimes, forms lumps. (TIP: When these lumps do occur you should grind them down to a powered form before use.) Though this fertilizer type is soluble in water, its nitrogen is not readily lost in drainage, because the ammonium ion is retained by the soil particles. A note of caution: Ammonium sulphate may have an acid effect on garden soil. Over time, the long-continued use of this type of fertilizer will increase soil acidity and thus lower the yield. (TIP: It is advisable to use this fertilizer type together with bulky organic manures to safeguard against the ill effects of continued application of ammonium sulphate.)
​

Ammonium Nitrate

This fertilizer type also comes in white crystalline salts. Ammonium Nitrate salts contains 33 to 35% nitrogen, of which half is nitrate nitrogen and the other half in the ammonium form. As part of the ammonium form, this type of fertilizer cannot be easily leached from the soil. This fertilizer is quick-acting, but highly hygroscopic thus making it unfit for storage. (TIP: Coagulation and Granulation of this fertilizer can be combated with a light coating of the granules with oil.) On a note of caution: Ammonium Nitrate also has an acid effect on the soil, in addition this type of fertilizer can be explosive under certain conditions, and, should thus be handled with care.

'Nitro Chalk' is the trade name of a product formed by mixing ammonium nitrate with about 40% lime-stone or dolomite. This fertilizer is granulated, non-hazardous and less hygroscopic. The lime content of this fertilizer type makes it useful for application to acidic garden soils.

dressing, but it should not be applied along the seed.
​

Ammonium Chloride

This fertilizer type comes in a white crystalline compound, which contains a good physical condition and 26% ammoniac nitrogen. In general, Ammonium Chloride is similar to ammonium sulphate in action. (TIP: Do not use this type of fertilizer on crops such as tomatoes because the chorine may harm your crop.)
​

Hmmm flushing science....interesting. So these three compounds can be extracted with a flush? They are understandably bad for health but are they removable? Im learning as i go for the most part, but saying that at least the nitrogen part of these three compounds is mobile through xylem and phloem leads me to belive that flushing would be a benifit in removing excess nitrogen from the plants circulatory system. Is that safe to assume?

 

[Howard Stern]

Im goona give it a shot! Worse case is I add 5-7 days to my curing process! Possibly a little harsher weed? Big fucking deal! If the fucking idea works then it works if it doesn't it doesn't. Until you have tried both shut the fuck up! I personally don't see the benefit of feeding the last week. I believe you aren't going to get much more out of the girl the last week, but I am willing to try it and see before I open my dick holster and talk shit, Like so many of you have!

Everyone wants proof from the OP and he has told you that he has tried both! Until have tried both how are you going to say it doesn't? You don't prove your side, but the OP is speaking from personal EXP! It may not work for you, not all the conditions are the same as the OP's grow or cure room so the only real way is to try it yourself. one plant 5 days? I love how everyone is a fucking growing expert!

Well my flush bud comes out great and all the folks who reviewed my end products have had nothing but awesome things to say about it... I think I will continue doing it "all wrong". You can see more of me doing it all wrong in my harvest pictures located in my signature.

Nobody said you were doing it the Wrong Way! This is just a different way that the OP is trying to share with everyone!

 

[Ninjabowler]

I also like how he fails to mention that chlorophyll breaks down not only during the drying time, but curing time as well. This whole thread is based on one person's theory of how much chlorophyll is in unflushed vs flushed bud and how long that chlorophyll takes to break down. All speculation that the OP probably hasn't even tested himself. I'd never let my shit hang for 12 days at 55% humidity.

If flushing actually removes or breaks down chlorophyll from the plant before the plant is chopped down then its not speculation anymore. If your saying that chlorophyll break down is an intrinsic element of quality smoke then the op makes perfect sence. I also unfortunatly belive that you are the one speculating again...."probably".
Please keep the momentum in the direction of science and not proving that everyones a fool but you.

 

[Ninjabowler]

No no no...I'm just saying I believe that unflushed buds benefit from a longer drying time.

Right gottcha..chlorophyll breakdown right? That would make sence.

 

[rocpilefsj]

There will never be a right answer on this topic, do what works best for you. I have not flushed for years and cannot notice a difference between the two. I am an asthmatic and am allergic to millions of things so if there was "hard metals" or "chemicals" left over in the bud I would know lol. If you get great results with not flushing like me, good for you, if you get great results by flushing then do that. Simple. I will say that any of the supposed nutrient indicators: ie dark ash, sparkly weed, harsh taste, etc. have not been an issue since I got my drying down to a science years ago. Dry your plants for as long as you posssibly can. Don't bitch about nutrients causing black ash and harsh taste when you dried your crop in a day and a half! Do what works best for you, end of story.

 

[Ninjabowler]

There will never be a right answer on this topic, do what works best for you. I have not flushed for years and cannot notice a difference between the two. I am an asthmatic and am allergic to millions of things so if there was "hard metals" or "chemicals" left over in the bud I would know lol. If you get great results with not flushing like me, good for you, if you get great results by flushing then do that. Simple. I will say that any of the supposed nutrient indicators: ie dark ash, sparkly weed, harsh taste, etc. have not been an issue since I got my drying down to a science years ago. Dry your plants for as long as you posssibly can. Don't bitch about nutrients causing black ash and harsh taste when you dried your crop in a day and a half! Do what works best for you, end of story.

Great advice as always Roc. Whats your take on the degradation of the clorophyll by the OP? Do you think theres merit to his claims? Seems like the lack of proper chlorophyll breakdown with a one day dry as you say is the determining factor in final quality.

 

[ru4r34l]

dont care what you "scientists" say, i prefer smoking on flushed bud, instead of smoking chemicals. If i wanted to do that i would smoke meth.

FYI THC is a chemical, and most people like smoking that particular chemical.

regards,

 

[polyarcturus]

Hmmm flushing science....interesting. So these three compounds can be extracted with a flush? They are understandably bad for health but are they removable? Im learning as i go for the most part, but saying that at least the nitrogen part of these three compounds is mobile through xylem and phloem leads me to belive that flushing would be a benifit in removing excess nitrogen from the plants circulatory system. Is that safe to assume?

yes and other chemicals not to mention salts, and the fact plants move the mass of their water back into the soil and night. flushing is real, it has a real effect on plants but is not the most necessary thing like most growers would have you believe. its a tool, and like most tools knowledge of how to use it correctly is most important.

 

[akula]

Do you flush?

Truth about flushing

There have been a lot of debates on this forum about flushing and there is a lot of misunderstanding about it in general flushing has its place in gardening and in the real world (other than MJ forums) is referred to as leeching

This will be a long read but I hope it will set the record straight for everyone, this has been posted in several places here but I am putting to post together to clear things up a bit for all of you

first a ditty from Sensi seeds with links verifying,,,

From an administrator at Sensi seeds

"Advanced - Flushing

A critical look at preharvest flushing

Pre harvest flushing is a controversial topic. Flushing is supposed to improve taste of the final bud by either giving only pure water, clearing solutions or extensive flushing for the last 7-14 days of flowering. While many growers claim a positive effect, others deny any positive influence or even suggest reduced yield and quality.

The theory of pre harvest flushing is to remove nutrients from the grow medium/root zone. A lack of nutrients creates a deficiency, forcing the plant to translocate and use up its internal nutrient compounds.

Nutrient fundamentals and uptake:

A good read about plant nutrition can be found here.

Until recently it was common thought that all nutrients are absorbed by plant roots as ions of mineral elements. However in newer studies more and more evidence emerged that additionally plant roots are capable of taking up complex organic molecules like amino acids directly thus bypassing the mineralization process.

The major nutrient uptake processes are:

1) Active transport mechanism into root hairs (the plant has to put energy in it, ATP driven) which is selective to some degree. This is one way the plant (being immobile) can adjust to the environment.

2) Passive transport (diffusion) through symplast to endodermis.

http://www.biol.sc.edu/courses/bio102/f99-3637.html

http://www.hort.wisc.edu/cran/Publications/2001 Proceedings/min_nutr.pdf

The claim only ‘chemical’ ferted plants need to be flushed should be taken with a grain of salt. Organic and synthetic ferted plants take up mineral ions alike, probably to a different degree though. Many influences play key roles in the taste and flavor of the final bud, like the nutrition balance and strength throughout the entire life cycle of the plant, the drying and curing process and other environmental conditions.

3) Active transport mechanism of organic molecules into root hairs via endocytosis.

http://acd.ucar.edu/~eholland/encyc6.html

Here is a simplified overview of nutrient functions:

Nitrogen is needed to build chlorophyll, amino acids, and proteins. Phosphorus is necessary for photosynthesis and other growth processes. Potassium is utilized to form sugar and starch and to activate enzymes. Magnesium also plays a role in activating enzymes and is part of chlorophyll. Calcium is used during cell growth and division and is part of the cell wall. Sulfur is part of amino acids and proteins.

Plants also require trace elements, which include boron, chlorine, copper, iron, manganese, sodium, zinc, molybdenum, nickel, cobalt, and silicon.

Copper, iron, and manganese are used in photosynthesis. Molybdenum, nickel, and cobalt are necessary for the movement of nitrogen in the plant. Boron is important for reproduction, while chlorine stimulates root growth and development. Sodium benefits the movement of water within the plant and zinc is neeeded for enzymes and used in auxins (organic plant hormones). Finally, silicon helps to build tough cell walls for better heat and drought tolerance.

http://www.sidwell.edu

You can get an idea from this how closely all the essential elements are involved in the many metabolic processes within the plant, often relying on each other.

Nutrient movement and mobility inside the plant:

Besides endocytosis, there are two major pathways inside the plant, the xylem and the phloem. When water and minerals are absorbed by plant roots, these substances must be transported up to the plant's stems and leaves for photosynthesis and further metabolic processes. This upward transport happens in the xylem. While the xylem is able to transport organic compounds, the phloem is much more adapted to do so.

The organic compounds thus originating in the leaves have to be moved throughout the plant, upwards and downwards, to where they are needed. This transport happens in the phloem. Compounds that are moving through the phloem are mostly:
Sugars as sugary saps, organic nitrogen compounds (amino acids and amides, ureides and legumes), hormones and proteins.

http://www.sirinet.net

Not all nutrient compounds are moveable within the plant.

1) N, P, K, Mg and S are considered mobile: they can move up and down the plant in both xylem and phloem.
Deficiency appears on old leaves first.

2) Ca, Fe, Zn, Mo, B, Cu, Mn are considered immobile: they only move up the plant in the xylem.
Deficiency appears on new leaves first.

http://generalhorticulture.tamu.edu

Storage organelles:

Salts and organic metabolites can be stored in storage organelles. The most important storage organelle is the vacuole, which can contribute up to 90% of the cell volume. The majority of compounds found in the vacuole are sugars, polysaccharides, organic acids and proteins though.

http://jeb.biologists.org.pdf

Translocation:

Now that the basics are explained, we can take a look at the translocation process. It should be already clear that only mobile elements can be translocated through the phloem. Immobile elements cant be translocated and are not more available to the plant for further metabolic processes and new plant growth.

Since flushing (in theory) induces a nutrient deficiency in the rootzone, the translocation process aids in the plants survival. Translocation is transportation of assimilates through the phloem from source (a net exporter of assimilate) to sink (a net importer of assimilate). Sources are mostly mature fan leaves and sinks are mostly apical meristems, lateral meristem, fruit, seed and developing leaves etc.

You can see this by the yellowing and later dying of the mature fan leaves from the second day on after flushing started. Developing leaves, bud leaves and calyxes don’t serve as sources, they are sinks. Changes in those plant parts are due to the deficient immobile elements which start to indicate on new growth first.

Unfortunately, several metabolic processes are unable to take place anymore since other elements needed are no longer available (the immobile ones). This includes processes where nitrogen and phosphorus, which have likely the most impact on taste, are involved.

For example nitrogen: usually plants use nitrogen to form plant proteins. Enzyme systems rapidly reduce nitrate-N (NO3-) to compounds that are used to build amino-nitrogen which is the basis for amino acids. Amino acids are building blocks for proteins, most of them are plant enzymes responsible for all the chemical changes important for plant growth.

Sulfur and calcium among others have major roles in production and activating of proteins, thereby decreasing nitrate within the plant. Excess nitrate within the plant may result from unbalanced nutrition rather than an excess of nitrogen.


Summary:

Preharvest flushing puts the plant(s) under serious stress. The plant has to deal with nutrient deficiencies in a very important part of its cycle. Strong changes in the amount of dissolved substances in the root-zone stress the roots, possibly to the point of direct physical damage to them. Many immobile elements are no more available for further metabolic processes. We are loosing the fan leaves and damage will show likely on new growth as well.

The grower should react in an educated way to the plant needs. Excessive, deficient or unbalanced levels should be avoided regardless the nutrient source. Nutrient levels should be gradually adjusted to the lesser needs in later flowering. Stress factors should be limited as far as possible. If that is accomplished throughout the entire life cycle, there shouldn’t be any excessive nutrient compounds in the plants tissue. It doesn’t sound likely to the author that you can correct growing errors (significant lower mobile nutrient compound levels) with preharvest flushing.

Drying and curing (when done right) on the other hand have proved (In many studies) to have a major impact on taste and flavour, by breaking down chlorophylls and converting starches into sugars. Most attributes blamed on unflushed buds may be the result of unbalanced nutrition and/or overfert and unproper drying/curing."



Now with an actual botanical understanding of how this works we move on to yet another botanical proven fact that if plants are drowned, which occurs in nature in the form of floods they go into a survival fermentaion mode converting sugars into alcohol I am reposting my ditty on harvesting and curing so you can see the evidence of this,,,,,,,,,,,,

Harvesting, Drying and Curing, A Research Study
The first word we used for this research was Oxidation, the second word is Fermentation as the fermentation process is what makes "the cure" work so understanding the fermentation process is very important.

Here at RIU there is a thread that includes a cut and paste from a book by Mel and Ed you all know I like Mels book I am not gonna paste it here as it is fairly long and this will be long enough as it is, but this same info appears on most every MJ forum and seems to be the basis for how we all cure today. It seems from my research that this was originally based on how tobaco is cured and we will get into that later, here is the RIU link to this info I advise you go read it then come back,,,,,,,,

Harvesting Curing Drying - Take Back the Knowledge

There is an old hippie growers myth that says to soak the roots in water for 3 to 10 days before harvest this is not to be confused with the flush that everyone talks about (you all know I don't flush before harvest, I flush always) the tip/myth is supposed to improve the quality of our smoke. I have to admit that I never paid it much attention until now because I have now proven it is not a myth and has some scientific validation.

What it amounts to is a way to start the cure prior to harvest while the plant is still alive. This is an incredible find as far as I am concerned and I can not wait to try it. what it amounts to is starving the plant of oxygen by drowning it, if in hydro take away the bubbles or spray fill the tank with water and wait, if in a pot either continuously water it (keep it wet/soaked) or stick the pot in a bigger bucket of water.

I need to add some background info as I'm getting ahead of myself, most of you know that if you add sugar and yeast together it ferments into alcohol giving off CO2. The basic definition of Fermentation is the act of breaking down sugars into alcohol and our plants do this internally thru a natural process even while growing. The act of fermentation is a oxidation/reduction process (explained in prior post) just as most plant functions seem to be. Also please be aware that N is needed for proper fermintation to take place.

Here is the info I found verifying that this old hippie myth is real,,,,,

MrMistery wrotejules

Plants use photosynthesis to make sugars out of water, CO2 and sunlight. But a plant cell (like any other cell) cannot use sugars for their cellular processes, it needs to break down the sugars and make ATP. Basically, the only difference between humans and plants in this chapter is that plants make their own sugars, while we get ours from food. But we still both need to use those sugars, and we do that through cellular respiration.

@douglebod
Fermentation is strictly defined as any way of anaerobically degrade pyruvic acid and recycle NAD+ to keep glycolysis going. You can then categorize this process as lactic acid fermentation (where pyruvate accepts electrons from NADH directly and becomes lactate), alcoholic fermentation (where pyruvate is first decarboxylated to acetaldehyde which then accepts electrons from NADH to become ethanol) and others (which are much more obscure). So technically, human cells are able to carry out lactic acid fermentation. Liver cells also have the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase (responsible for ethanol formation in yeast and other fungi), but we use it in the reverse direction so to speak to get rid of any alcohol which we consume by converting it to pyruvate.
Plants however, can carry out alcoholic fermatation. They don't normally do it, because plants are usually in contact with oxygen. However, if you flood the root of a plant for about a week the cells are starved of oxygen, and because of this they will start carrying out alcoholic fermentation to survive.

-Andrei

very true
that is what my bio textbook says.
just to complete the last part
in alcoholic pathway ethanol forms a waste while the lactate formed in the lactate pathway can be broken down further. that is what leads to the oxygen debt​

found here,
http://www.biology-online.org/biolog...bout16671.html

and,


Alcoholic Fermentation In Plants

By the following, which we find in the London Gardener's Chronicle, it will be seen that the discovery is somewhat akin to those of Prof. Burrill and others in this country:
"When plants are deprived of oxygen gas it appears that alcohol is formed in all their tissues without the aid of any ferment. If a vegetable cell containing sugar be cut off from its supply of oxygen - be suffocated, in fact - the sugar it contains becomes broken up or changed into carbonic acid, alcohol, and other products. Moreover, the various alcoholic ferments only produce their effects under the same conditions. Alcoholic fermentation, then, depends solely on the suffocation of a living cell containing sugar. Starting from these ascertained facts, M. Van Tieghem, in a recent number of the Annales Agronomiques, alludes to a peculiar disease in apple trees due to a suffocation of the roots, followed by the production of alcohol in their tissues. On microscopic examination the tissues were found healthy, except the medullary rays, the cells of which, instead of containing starch or sugar, contained brown oily globules, the residue left after the formation of the alcohol, which latter is diffused throughout the root, tinging the cells of a characteristic brown color, and giving rise to an easily detected alcoholic odor.
Judging from these appearances what was the nature of the disease, M. Van Tieghem made inquiries as to the character of the soil, and from this, as well as the fact that the season had been extremely wet, his diagnosis was confirmed, and he in consequence prescribed efficient drainage as the remedy for the disease, and with good effect.



found here,
http://chestofbooks.com/gardening-ho...In-Plants.html

one more
http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_gui...eId-23703.html

I am giving you this info first as it relates to doing something prior to the actual harvest chop. The rest of what I found will bring everything that we find already posted in the harvest forum to a hopefully better understanding.

We as MJ growers have modified/refined the basic knowledge of curing and fermentation of other plants due to the fact that our buds are not leaves and are therefore more subceptable to mold but the basic premise is the same, we don't add to much heat because it is known to degrade THC. We don't maintain higher humidity levels to avoid mold. The piling of the plants to induce fermentation is the same concept that makes composting work and for us home growers this is why we use a paper bag or cardboard box because it creates a scaled down compost/fermentation chamber, with this in mind pay great attention to why it is necessary to check often and rotate/rearrange the buds during this part of the process. Also know that this process will also continue once you put your buds into jars.

I also want to point out that while it is easier to trim your buds before drying that leaving the leafs on and hanging the plant allows the leafs to dry formed around the bud to protect it from various things most importantly oxidation which we know degrades the THC. It also allows the buds to dry more slowly which is what we truely want to happen.
My friend Shrubs did this on his second harvest, now I know why.

Please remember that patience is a virtue the slower they dry the better they will be,,,,,,,,period. To many growers are in a hurry and as a result speed things up once you read all of the info I am about to present you will see what I am saying is true as I have (yes I have read all of it)

Next I am going to share several MJ specific links about harvesting & curing as more heads are always better than one and the whole of all of them put together creates a pretty solid picture for us to consider as we try to improve our techniques. a couple of them even explain how to add flavors in case anyone wants to experiment a bit.

Here they are in no particular order
http://www.wietmeneer.nl/growing/haze.html

http://forum.grasscity.com/harvestin...uana-more.html

http://www.sky.org/data/grow/c21.html

http://www.marijuanapassion.com/foru...p-Ed-Rosenthal

http://www.420magazine.com/forums/ha...ng-curing.html

http://forum.sensiseeds.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5836

http://www.seedbankupdate.com/cure.htm

I am including the following links because they explain how other plants are cured in various different ways for color and taste this info will not only help us to better understand the various processes but may offer ideas for future experiments that might create a better end product. what you will see is while the techniques vary a bit they are all very similar.

Cacao (chocolate)
http://www.allchocolate.com/understa...o_factory.aspx

Tea
http://www.wtea.com/about-tea_growth.aspx

http://the-leaf.org/issue%202/wp-con...age-layout.pdf

Tobacco
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco#Curing

http://books.google.com/books?id=9c8...curing&f=false

http://www.cigars4dummies.com/tobacc...ng/drying.html

http://books.google.com/books?id=4so...curing&f=false

http://chestofbooks.com/health/mater...Tinctures.html

http://books.google.com/books?id=A1I...curing&f=false

lots of other plants
http://bookshop.cabi.org/Uploads/Boo...1845933562.pdf


We're almost finished, I found a couple more things that I know will spark your DIY talents for technique tweaking LOL

Here is a homemade drying chamber
http://www.coffinails.com/curing_tobacco.html

here is a homemade fermentation chamber
http://www.instructables.com/id/Toba...er-for-cigars/

in the comments section they mention an egg incubator that has adjustable heat and humidity for around $70, here it is
https://www.gqfmfg.com/store/comersu...?idCategory=29#

and that brings us to the end of my research. I spent about 20 hours on all of this but you should be able to follow it all in just 2 or 3 since I was going thru 100's of pages to find the ones I have posted

I hope that everyone that reads this comes away with a better understanding of how it all works and that as a result we all have better herb to enjoy in the future

Happy Harvesting



Lots of us here that follow this technique have had excellent results and have found that an extended dark period of 3~4 days speeds up the drowning/fermentation process

Let the discussion begin​

By the way, as for the organic vs inorganic or "chemical ferts"? organic is simply a process better for the environment as a whole. Organic ferts are created in a process in your medium where the by-products are what your plants desire...your macro nutrients (like nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, c[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]alcium [/FONT] etc etc) and your micro nutes ([FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Boron[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif], Chlorine,[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif] Copper,[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif] Iron etc etc). [/FONT]The so called chemical nutes are (usually) just those nutrients that have been created in a lab. What goes into the roots (usually) is exactly the same as what is available via the organic process. I say usually because some fert manufactures add some extra crap that is outside these required nutes. So if you like to do everything you can to protect the enviroment, go organic.

Nutrients cannabis plants need

 

[Ninjabowler]

Oh jeez, not this post again^^^

ive read through all that, i dont see it, sorry. I cant even tell if the person who wrote that up is argueing for or against a flush, there is evidence to support both sides in that. It seems that they are definitley in favour of a proper dry and cure but really, wheres the flushing evidence? Says things move up and down in the plant...ok, were past that, now what? Drowning apple trees?

Can you explain this to me please? Where it is? Or even just pull out the quote from the text that supports the conclusion.

 

[akula]

Oh jeez, not this post again^^^

ive read through all that, i dont see it, sorry. I cant even tell if the person who wrote that up is argueing for or against a flush, there is evidence to support both sides in that. It seems that they are definitley in favour of a proper dry and cure but really, wheres the flushing evidence? Says things move up and down in the plant...ok, were past that, now what? Drowning apple trees?

Can you explain this to me please? Where it is? Or even just pull out the quote from the text that supports the conclusion.

Sorry if you are unwilling or unable to simply read and comprehend that thread to figure out the conclusion it makes, I could never sum it up in a word or two for you to properly digest since its not that simple obviously. There is however a Summary Section that pretty much spells it right out for you in not too many words. There is also the entire section on Translocation which does a fairly good job of spelling this complicated process out in "laymens" terms. Of course you could also do your own due diligence, as I once did, and simply type Translocation into that Google search bar and look into it into much greater detail.

But what I really think you are asking for is a simple statement that tells you what you want to hear. That doesn't exist and knowledge is not just something gained from a quick quote in a thread at rollitup. It actually takes a little bit of effort on your part if you really want to gain real knowledge. Of course that is hard and its easier to just continue to dismiss anything you find difficult to understand.

 

[HeartlandHank]

I did not flush for the first this past harvest... I also used a new fertilizer.
I hit record yields, but at the same time everyone is saying my buds do not taste, smell, or carry the potency that my previous crops did, flushed.

I do not believe that this feedback really answers any questions about the debate. It is just another piece of the puzzle for me in deciding how I will do it in the future.

I'm going to flush again this round... nothing but water for the final 12 days. No copious amounts of water, just ph'd plain water.

 

[BigBuddahCheese]

Common sense is to give the plant what it "NEEDS" for growth and there is NEVER a NEED to flush.

Look at Organic growers like SuperSoil.. they ONLY add water there is NEVER flushing, as the nutrients are in the soil and never added. If they just flushed at the end with water, its exactly as they did the entire grow. The plants in SS take what they need, and they claim there buds are superior?

So.. with that logic and my own research I never flush if I am on top of my plants and giving them just enough EC and not slamming them.

It's common sense if your plants look like 90% of the plants that are slammed beyond EC constraints to squeeze every nug out of them, and slammed chemical additives and look like shit, YES flush the SHIT you slammed down their throats out. I mean these monkeys believe every snake oil myth out there, and flock to the hydro to buy it. Sad.

If you have common sense and grow the plants as they should be, and they healthy as they should be I would never flush and I never do. No one ever complains yet... many "oh wow" compliments though.

 

[rocpilefsj]

Sorry if you are unwilling or unable to simply read and comprehend that thread to figure out the conclusion it makes, I could never sum it up in a word or two for you to properly digest since its not that simple obviously. There is however a Summary Section that pretty much spells it right out for you in not too many words. There is also the entire section on Translocation which does a fairly good job of spelling this complicated process out in "laymens" terms. Of course you could also do your own due diligence, as I once did, and simply type Translocation into that Google search bar and look into it into much greater detail.

But what I really think you are asking for is a simple statement that tells you what you want to hear. That doesn't exist and knowledge is not just something gained from a quick quote in a thread at rollitup. It actually takes a little bit of effort on your part if you really want to gain real knowledge. Of course that is hard and its easier to just continue to dismiss anything you find difficult to understand.

So you don't understand it either is what you are saying lol. I don't think he is being lazy, I have read through that quite a few times and other than sound fancy it does not have anymore merit to it than anything else posted on this thread or the billion others... Love those half a page copy and paste jobs that 99% of people are never gonna take the time to read. This is a weed forum bud, I sometimes lose my place if there is more than three lines to read!

 

[rocpilefsj]

Great advice as always Roc. Whats your take on the degradation of the clorophyll by the OP? Do you think theres merit to his claims? Seems like the lack of proper chlorophyll breakdown with a one day dry as you say is the determining factor in final quality.

Could ne true, could be bs... There is probably more that we don't know about growing mj then we do, and that is just a fact. I have read and researched for hours and days on the subject and all you do is go around in circles with no clear cut evidence or proof. Just a bunch of links to studies with theories, no concrete facts. That is why I always have the same answer for flushing, R days of darkness, etc. Do what works for you in your situation. Who am I or some snooty scientist to tell someone what they are doing is wrong or right. If it works roll with it. Stay high!

 

[Ninjabowler]

Sorry if you are unwilling or unable to simply read and comprehend that thread to figure out the conclusion it makes, I could never sum it up in a word or two for you to properly digest since its not that simple obviously. There is however a Summary Section that pretty much spells it right out for you in not too many words. There is also the entire section on Translocation which does a fairly good job of spelling this complicated process out in "laymens" terms. Of course you could also do your own due diligence, as I once did, and simply type Translocation into that Google search bar and look into it into much greater detail.

But what I really think you are asking for is a simple statement that tells you what you want to hear. That doesn't exist and knowledge is not just something gained from a quick quote in a thread at rollitup. It actually takes a little bit of effort on your part if you really want to gain real knowledge. Of course that is hard and its easier to just continue to dismiss anything you find difficult to understand.

The translocation part is what i was saying when i said that nitrogen is mobile within the plant. Thats where this text to me becomes contradictory. If excess is trying to be avoided and excess nutrients are mobile, then why wouldnt the flush be effective?

Im kickin at 1500 ppm right now and im sure thats just a little excessive for hydro. My plan is not to run straight water for 14 or 12 days. Instead i plan to run 400 ish five or six days before chop and just fill with straight water For those last days. So i understand the summary section you talked of also.


As for you telling me what i want to hear, i dont want to hear anything except the truth on the topic. The truth for every grower is what works best for them. Im reading, learning, and participating in basicly an online study group of professional growers to shape my perspective on flushing, its called RIU lol


This topic has many opinions that are black or white. Im taking gray on this one. I still believe that Uncle Pirates method of reducing feed at the end of the life cycle to between 200 - 400 ppm is what the plant wants at that point in time. He is a No flush advocate but runs very minimal nutrients in the final stages, in essence running mostly water or the f word to me. Theres a big difference from 1500 ppm to 300 ppm so excess nutrients in theory are f'd out of there, right?


The problem i have with that post about drowning apple trees and cigars is that it seems that it has more to do with a good dry and cure like i said, and touches just minimally on the actual flush specifics, aplication, and results, of flushing or not flushing. That my friend is why i am dismissing the post, not because its difficult to understand.