"Why does anybody need an assault weapon"

canndo

Well-Known Member
The problem in America is the question. We are not a nation of people who should heavily inspect the question of "why" a person wants what he wants.


It is unamerican in the extreme to question the desires (the pursuit of happiness) of others. "why does anyone want 10 billion dollars? Isn't 5 plenty"?

Why does anyone want high heels with live goldfish in them, why does anyone want chia pets?

Even in the realm of semi-automatic weapons, that particular question really should not be asked in this society.


I had a friend long ago who spent much of his time and more of his money - - - hopping up his CHAIN SAW! It had a tuned header extractor, it had pop up pistons and special antifouling spark plugs, I coulnd't understand how there was a secondary market that detailed not only for two cycle engines but for chainsaws of every different stripe. in my opinion, the guy was crazy even though he eventualy began competing in statewide tournaments in my opinion that gave him no extra excuse - WHY does anyone need a methanol powered chain saw?

Is my lack of understanding of his intense satisfaction over having and toying with this utter waste of time, energy, steel, gas and plastic of any bearing? any at all?

If we were to live in a country where we were forced to justify the "need" for our every hobby or posession this would be a country I do not want to live in. Now I believe that the enviornomentalists would find this man's hobby abhorent, evil, blashpehmous. This machine was made with a single purpose in mind - to KILL TREES and to kill them in the shortest possible time with the greatest possible efficiency (I think the guy actually took a couple of third place prizes in the state).

Never mind the reality - that he burned methanol, expended plugs, fouled the air, made quite natural settings vibrate with ugly man-sounds, the truth is still that he never once actually used his expensive device to kill trees, he specialized in already downed and sized logs.

Do we have the right to ask him if he "NEEDS" that machine? I don't think so.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Travan Martin would have been better off not assaulting Zimmerman...
yep, the kid who ran away from the guy with a violent history who was following him did the assault.

no way that nigger could have been defending himself, he's a nigger! those guys get hopped up on the mary jane and beat up white people and rape the white women with the strength of 50 negroes!

just kidding, good job on making the racist assumption though, kiddo.
 

mr2shim

Well-Known Member
do you use it for self defense, hunting, or compensation for a tiny penis, inflated ego, and to assuage your paranoia?
That's not answering my question but I'll play.

If I hunted, yes I would use an AR15 and you can go to www.ar15.com. Plenty of folk on there hunt with theirs and even post pictures. Yes, I would use one for self defense if I had one but I do not. No, my dick is big enough thank you. My ego is in check. I'm not not paranoid, realistic yes, paranoid no.

So, I thought we were having a nice discussion here. Are you not going to answer my questions? I answered yours. I'll ask again.

What makes it a military style weapon?
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
If you think the bolt action rifle was originally designed to hunt deer you don't know your firearm history.
I know my firearms history

They all have there origins in warfare.

But I digress

Tell me you could wipe out 26 people in a school with a bolt action firearm
It's a rhetorical question, isnt it?
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
I know my firearms history

They all have there origins in warfare.

But I digress

Tell me you could wipe out 26 people in a school with a bolt action firearm
It's a rhetorical question, isnt it?
Why would I need to unless the US banned all semi-automatic rifles, handguns and other arms from the citizens....
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA! (translation: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!)



lol. yeah right.

you got your ass handed to you by reality. you got all embarrassed.*

reality is a tough pill to swallow sometimes, kiddo.
I was so embarrassed I created a post saying you were right... (you probably fapped to it)

Yeah, you are on to me.... LOL!
 

mr2shim

Well-Known Member
I know my firearms history

They all have there origins in warfare.

But I digress

Tell me you could wipe out 26 people in a school with a bolt action firearm
It's a rhetorical question, isnt it?
My original comment was based on your original statement.

"Assault rifles are rifles specifically engineered to kill people"

Weren't all guns? Yes, yes they were.

To answer your question, it wouldn't be that difficult. How long does it take to chamber a round probably two seconds maybe? I'm not sure, never tried to see how fast I could put 10 rounds down range with a bolt action. Granted it would take longer that is pretty obvious. It's not impossible. A gun is designed to kill. The end. It doesn't matter how fast you can pull the trigger. If you are the only person in an environment with a gun time is on your side.

Would you disagree with anything I've just said?

Also, seeing as how you know your firearms. You know that some bolt actions have 5 or 10 round magazines.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I was so embarrassed I created a post saying you were right... (you probably fapped to it)

Yeah, you are on to me.... LOL!
so if you're not embarrassed, you should be able to tell me why unskewed polls was actually right, no?
 

mr2shim

Well-Known Member
JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA! (translation: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!)



lol. yeah right.

you got your ass handed to you by reality. you got all embarrassed.*

reality is a tough pill to swallow sometimes, kiddo.
You led me on thinking you wanted to have a serious debate. Fooled me.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
I was so embarrassed I created a post saying you were right... (you probably fapped to it)

Yeah, you are on to me.... LOL!
Remember that one time Buck was right and you were wrong? yeah me too, he's been talking about that ONE time for 2 months now.

Open question to anyone wanting to impose magazine limits, scary guns restriction ect.. Why didn't the founding fathers specify what type of arms and put restrictions there?
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
The news media outlets call the AR15's and other assault rifles an assault weapon(s). That's a political term that was created in 1989. You quote news as fact yet they blatantly lie continually. Which outlet do you work for? Aside from your obvious trolling you must work for one of them to continually spew out lies. MSNBC? How much do you make?
The AR15 civilian version is not an assault rifle. cn
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
oh, so you're just choosing to not call a bushmaster XM15 an assault rifle now?

did he or did he not go in there with his bushmaster XM15 assault rifle? yes or no?
The Bushmaster or any civilian AR derivative is not an assault rifle. That's why the antis ginned up the snarl term "assault weapon". cn
 
Top