Reread this thread, you'll see exactly how.i know people that smoked ICE in the 60's, if you invented it you must be 60-70-80?
I got my cake, and I eat it too.
I'm sorry you are all upset that I had a happy time with it in my youth.
I'm sorry that I expect people to be a bit less emotional in how they deal with this, a bit more logical, and attempt to understand the various types of drug addiction paths in their body, and behave appropriately.
I know most won't.
Narcotics (opiates) go the endorphin path. Alcohol, barbiturates, hypnotics go the GABA path. Amphetamines go the dopamine path. While they may affect a variety of chemicals in your body, these are the major agonist/antagonist pathways and the cause very different types of behavior both in immediate reaction and long term addiction, especially how they may or may not trigger seizures and death during withdrawal.
When I was 13-18, I STUDIED the PDR. It was fun. That was a LONG time ago. Science in the last 5 years has given incredible leaps in the amount we know of how these substances interact at the molecular level.
You give stories. Yes, these ARE dangerous substances, and YES, most people should stay the fuck away from them. But there are a small subset that can handle them.
I did. I simply choose not to now because of my age, blood pressure, and heart condition (which has NOTHING (or very little, hey, it's possible)) with my drug use in my youth. I didn't lose all my teeth or steal from my friend to support my use.
Right now I stick with pot (pain, anti-inflammatory, fun) and shrooms and other majors but only rarely (3 times a year seems the norm nowaways). But that is only because I don't want to push my heart with a major dopamine driver. Not because I'm worried about becoming addicted to it.
But opiates TERRIFY me.
Go ahead and tell me I'm wrong. Slice you to little bits. Nicely, if possible, because we are all here NOT to get SCREAMED at, we are here to be educated.
Oh, BTW: I had a bad trip when I was 18, realized my life was going nowhere, and volunteered to go to rehab. I had a "bad trip". I now know there is no such thing as a "bad trip", they are all educational experiences, and to be treasured. In this case, it got me into rehab, which is what I needed at that time in my life. I would very happily (reverently even) take some quality LSD today. Well, not today, kinda busy, but you get my point.
Meth was a very small part of that equation. I spent 30 days there and was clean (no NOTHING) for 7 months. I went to meeting at least 3 times a week, lived with an NA buddy, and only hung with NA people. I then smoked a couple of bong hits (7 months in), didn't get any for the next day, realized it was not a good idea, and stopped.
FOR 20+ years. Nothing. I may have had 10 doctor prescribed pills the entire time during back spasms. No drink, no over the counter, no NOTHING. Then a mild spiral in doctor prescribed pills for very good reasons (he's retiring in a week, last meeting with him, it was a hell of an education over the last 20 years for him, me "clean" and then me now, mhahahahahaaha)
AA/NA meetings the 1st 10 years, nothing for the next 10.
I've got counselor level knowledge and experience that you could not imagine. I'm done the "speaker" tour. I'm an invited guest (or at least was) for rehab visit/speaker days.
I KNOW that stats.
So, go ahead, try to have a rational non attack discussion. We may all learn something. But please leave the hysterics for the children.
Haha, you know what you're right. Idgaf that you're too scared of your own control to try another drug. And amphetamines don't have medicinal value? You kidding me? Just keep talking out your ass dude maybe you'll be right someday.lol getting pretty upset for a meaningless opinion
those household chemicals do not hold a PURE chemical. you get that chemical plus all the other ones in there with it. how could taking in battery acid be good for you in any way. i smoke weed and thats about it, a drink from time to time. i think just about EVERYBODY would agree weed and alcohol are better than meth. both have some medicinal benefits. dont think meth does....so ya....
im living in the heart of the meth state and hear every day on the radio of your kind being busted or a meth lab blowing up. those damn things are blowing up at least twice a month in my area alone. dont sound like you guys are the sharpest tool in the shed, and im an idiot....lol....hear about you on the radio. later!
We are in agreement. The term "freebasing" referred to taking cocaine hydrochloride (HCL) (standard steet coke) and stripping the hydrochloride base. Freebase means NO base. No HCL base. It is the HCL that makes it water soluble, which means you can snort it (and eat, etc), but you can't smoke it. Strip the HCL, it becomes smokable. It was a dangerous (ether evaporation while doing bong hits is a BAD idea) process, and expensive, because 1st you had to buy your coke, then run that process, and coke ran about $80-$150 a gram in those days, and I was young and poor, and no one was selling the freebased version, you had to make it yourself. Which I then did.i thought we were talking meth. i know it was around in the very early 80's, i smoked it. yes, there was freebasing going on then too. i have people very close to me that were cooking in the 60's that told me of ice 20-30 years before i heard the term on tv. i never heard the term free basing used when talking meth.
again...you have to be somewhat retarded from the start to even try meth. so with that being said im done arquing with a retard. cant argue with retarded people....they dont know any better. and again ill hear about you on the radio and news. try not to blow yourself up with the rest of your kindHaha, you know what you're right. Idgaf that you're too scared of your own control to try another drug. And amphetamines don't have medicinal value? You kidding me? Just keep talking out your ass dude maybe you'll be right someday.
You don't use battery acid to cook meth, more talking shit that you don't know, you've just heard.
And you think as soon as a person hits the ice pipe that they are instantaneously put into a generalization of "your kind" and you people... There are meth users out there that have what they do under control, you know why they don't get caught in addiction or jail? Because they know how to control themselves and they aren't fucking retarded.
Do you really think what you're saying applies to meth? Would there be any situation where you'd recommend someone tries meth? Are you really baffled by someone telling another person not to do meth because they've gone through hell and back because of it? I understand the points you're trying to make and exactly what you have an issue with, but it's just so damn stupid I'm sorry lmao.That sky diver who somehow managed to survive after his chute failed is not the one to listen to about how no one should ever step out of an airplane. His story should be included in your canvasing of information as to whether you should take up the sport but you are advised also to speak to those who's equipment did not fail. That is my point. Listen to those who have had problems with a substance but don't conclude the substance must be bad because the person you are talking to was not a success (success being the ability to manage one's consumption of that substance).
Closer to home. I have heard personal revelations about people's unfortunate battles with alcoholism. Alcohol will take some of us without a doubt but to listen ONLY to those who failed in their ability to negotiate reasonably with that particular chemical ignores all of the success stories of those who enjoy their wine with dinner, have a few drinks with the boys and then thinks no more of the substance. If I let one of the failures tell me "never ever touch this chemical" then that person is doing me a disservice. If he simply tells me his experience without the final admonition fine, but because he had a tough time does not necessarily indicate that EVERYONE will.
You seem to place great stock in anecdotal evidence - it is the most interesting way to garner information but it is hardly dependable as a full source of knowledge.
Do we know this person's genetic makeup? do we know his upbringing? His personal experiences? Are those things akin to our own? The anecdotal tends not to bring those items into focus.
Now I see that you didn't take my comparison between meth and pot very seriously. Seems that most don't simply because or primarily because pot is the drug of choice on this website. But because it is, the bad effects of marijuana are generaly ignored, worse yet, pot is lauded as the magical cure for all that ails a person. The fact is that both pot and meth are chemicals, chemicals that are not entirely foreign to the human body. My comparison stands, if I were to tell you a horror story about pot (and they do really exist) you would not take my warning seriously and probably question his legitimacy or veracity - as another poster has already done. Again, it is one thing for this person (poor guy just wanted to make a statement and look where I've taken it), to tell us his story, it is quite another to tell us that we should never ever even try this substance - not even after having performed one' own due diligence. I had problems with that very chemical but I will not presume to tell YOU not to use it or claim that the results YOU encounter will be as bad as mine (not that bad really, but bad enough for me to require help).
And that was what I took issue with, that is what I still take issue with.
I know numbers of people who did NOT have a problem with meth. They are doctors and lawyers and farmers and such. They took up the stuff for this reason or that, used it in a moderate way and one day put it down, some still on occasion continue to use. These are what I would call successes. Now the truth is that none of them will tell you that they got any true benifit from their use, no enlightenment, no lasting enjoyable memories save perhaps an inordinately clean home. The lawyers may point to their having passed the bar as a result of their use but I suspect they would have done as well without the chemical "help".
I think the best example of what I am talking about - since the parachutist didn't really cut it, is to find 20 LSD users and ask each of them if they would recomend others use the substance. The ones that were the most successful would either tell you that you should, or, in my belief, if they were TRUELY successful in their encounters would tell you their wonderful experiences and claim that only you are equipped to decide no matter how marvelous they found their journey. But you are bound to encounter someone who found themselves on an 8 hour trip to hell. Would they be the only ones to listen to as they warned you never ever to, under any circumstances, try acid?
My ignorance not withstanding, I submit that each person spoken to might bring you a bit of knowledge and that no single person should be relied on more heavily than another.
Just to belabor the point and perhaps to add to the mass of anecdotal evidence we might want to look at the mentality of the drug user himself.
I'm not reading the rest of your shit. You're either going to beat the same meaningless point into the ground or create a bunch of new equally ignorant ones.Do your self a favor and dont even try the shit once cause theres no turning back. YOU WILL LIKE IT. And it will take over your life, weather it be in a week or a yrs the crap will ruin your life. Take it from a former addict. And that hardly ever happends, most dont make it out. DO NOT TRY METH...NOT EVEN A LIL BIT! This thread should be removed or some shit...JMHO
I'm not reading the rest of your shit. You're either going to beat the same meaningless point into the ground or create a bunch of new equally ignorant ones.
Read your first post in this thread, y'know, the one that started this whole thing. I'm assuming you're one of those people who uses the phrase 'no offense', and thinks that clears all offense from what you are about to say. Sorry if my insults offended you, but do you not remember your insults to Stomper420? Telling someone who's stating they've been clean from meth for 15 years they're a failure is pretty fucking rude at best. I insulted you in defense to the person you insulted. Did I not mention from the start your post angered me? You were an IGNORANT ASSHOLE in your first post, and are now complaining that I called you what you were, or are. Oh the shame oh the shame..get real please..break out of your 'state of ignorance' already.there is never anything shameful about ignorance, though your last few posts have made it seem so. There is, however, in my opinion something quite shameful in the willful arrival at such a state, one's choice to remain in a state of ignorance is what makes all the difference.
Considering that you place special emphasis upon the anecdotal and declare that you will not read the rest of my shit based upon your projection of what I am going to say has me believe that you don't think all that much of the anecdotal as you insist.
However I bear you no animosity nor ill will, I've not outright insulted you and am saddened that you feel it necessary to do so. It is entirely possible that you may see some benefit from some of the information I post here from time to time. Even information that you find you disagree with.
Read your first post in this thread, y'know, the one that started this whole thing. I'm assuming you're one of those people who uses the phrase 'no offense', and thinks that clears all offense from what you are about to say. Sorry if my insults offended you, but do you not remember your insults to Stomper420? Telling someone who's stating they've been clean from meth for 15 years they're a failure is pretty fucking rude at best. I insulted you in defense to the person you insulted. Did I not mention from the start your post angered me? You were an IGNORANT ASSHOLE in your first post, and are now complaining that I called you what you were, or are. Oh the shame oh the shame..get real please..break out of your 'state of ignorance' already.