Government protects private property? Maybe....Sometimes. That is not a given, in fact how can an institution that places an automatic lien on your income, your house and your decisions about your own body be said to "protect" private property? It seems like they protect SOME private property, but far more often TAKE private property, no?
Absolutely. They protect it for a very small few, from the rest of us.
Think I need to elaborate on this a bit more, the problem volunatrist/anarcho-capitilist and I; have with anarcho-communism/left libertarianism/etc... Is that it doesn't advocate for liberty for everyone uniformely because of this property rights argument. If it weren't for the goverment only less than 5% of the land is actually occupied by private property owners, so there would be plenty of land for everyone, plenty of room to have your hippie communes, sharing experiments, etc...(Which we have absolutely no problem with, We view it as a business plan) but when you enforce this on everyone, when you say THIS IS HOW SOCIETY SHOULD BE this is clearly a violation of ethics and of the non-agression principle because you are forcing things on others by violent force.
ofcourse its the fruits of your labor, something that didn't exist if it weren't for you, so that fence sure that would be your fence since you built it but of course not everything within that fence. so that being said as long as the fence isn't harming others or my wishes aren't harming others you should respect my property. Of course in this example its highly likely that its doing harm to others.
The first paragraph is crap. It is a strawman to say "someone would enforce hippie communes." If that is the problem that feudalism has with anarchy, I think you need to look up the word Hierarchy and then look up the word Anarchy. To then spew percentage statistics about land ownership is also crap. The system of feudalism will reward empire builders consolidating private ownership.
Your saying that property sharing should be enforced which is exactly what I wrote, So now your going on to say that property rights will "reward empire builders consolidating private ownership. "The first paragraph is crap. It is a strawman to say "someone would enforce hippie communes." If that is the problem that feudalism has with anarchy, I think you need to look up the word Hierarchy and then look up the word Anarchy. To then spew percentage statistics about land ownership is also crap. The system of feudalism will reward empire builders consolidating private ownership.
No. I'm saying that IT IS NOT PROPERTY!
so if you farm up an acre of marijuana or build your house people should be allowed to do as they please to this property because its not yours ...its societies...
Live not for what you can acquire, live for what you can leave behind.
Why do you hate society?
Private property, keep out!
I hate society. Let them eat cake.
Inequality bothers me.
I do not feel that theft is ever morally justified by anyone especialy by a 'group' who labels themselves as 'society' . This idea of collectivism is theft that is violently forced on certain people. If I grow a crop of marijuana nobody should be allowed to do what they want with it, If I build a house someone shouldn't be able to demolish it and build a highway over it. Its simple ethics, the idea that there is this 'society' that 'collectively agrees what is right and what is wrong and therefore they are allowed to make certain exceptions is a wolf in sheeps clothing, its a government, which creates victims and thrives on violence, an entity with magical properties to violate the same moral rules they punish us for.