Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013

[ginjawarrior]

****spamming debunked study****

Update:

Six French scientific academies issued a statement on 19 October, saying the Séralini study could not reverse previous conclusions that this and other GM crops are safe, because of problems with the experimental design, statistical analysis and animals used, and inadequate data. Meanwhile the European Food Safety Authority declared the study "of insufficient scientific quality to be considered as valid for risk assessment". As promised, the organisation invited Séralini "to share key additional information". That invitation was made on 4 October, and repeated on 19 October. Today, EFSA announced it had (again) made all the data it used to approve the GM maize available to Séralini.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22287-study-linking-gm-crops-and-cancer-questioned.html

http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2012/09/24/bad-science-on-gmos-it-reminds-me-of-the-antivaccine-movement/

Does genetically modified corn cause cancer? A flawed study fails to convince.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2012/09/24/does-genetically-modified-corn-cause-cancer-a-flawed-study/

French GM Corn Study Not Scientifically Valid
By Dan Flynn | October 8, 2012

Last month’s study out of France that said genetically modified corn and a related herbicide caused organ damage, tumors, and early death among rats broke too many rules and should be dismissed as “of insufficient scientific quality,” the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) says.

http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2012/10/french-gm-corn-study-not-scientifically-valid/#.UQmzH_IauM0




now tell me about those horrible GMO tomatoes on the market

 

[ginjawarrior]

Ill give you one guess why this corn looks like this....ok..since your a little slow it starts with Mon and its not monster, close though View attachment 2503834

want to provide links for those pictures?

just want to check your not being taken for a ride again like you have been with the tomatoes or the shitty quality study your spamming

 

[ginjawarrior]

They are not. They are distinct, and your conflating them can no longer be termed ignorance, but malice. You''re persisting in being incorrect, so I must ask what's in it for you? cn

he doesnt want to lose his smug sense of superiority from being a "gastro foodie"

that and he doesnt seem to have the backbone to admit he's a liar

 

[Ninjabowler]

want to provide links for those pictures?

just want to check your not being taken for a ride again like you have been with the tomatoes or the shitty quality study your spamming

Just search gmo corn and youll find them. You cant miss those gross rats. Youll find all sorts of gross pics, i like this one, it made me laugh. It reminds me of the rats

 

[ginjawarrior]

Just search gmo corn and youll find them. You cant miss those gross rats. Youll find all sorts of gross pics, i like this one, it made me laugh. It reminds me of the rats

the gross rats are from the bunk study you have been spamming

 

[Ninjabowler]

the gross rats are from the bunk study you have been spamming

Um i posted it once and it was from a credible journal. Sooo since the debunked study was said to not have enough evidence that it was the monsanto products that caused all those tumors, how do you figure they really got those tumors? Care to tell us your conspiricy theory on this one? I bet it was the monsanto products what do you think??

 

[Ninjabowler]

Refer to cartoon above ^^^

 

[ginjawarrior]

Um i posted it once and it was from a credible journal. Sooo since the debunked study was said to not have enough evidence that it was the monsanto products that caused all those tumors, how do you figure they really got those tumors? Care to tell us your conspiricy theory on this one? I bet it was the monsanto products what do you think??

the rats are ones that are bred to form cancers

the "study" you posted klept them alive for long enough that cancers formed


notice there isnt a side by side with the "control group" (i put quotes round it becuase their control group was not set up as controls should be)

now i have posted links as to why its a discredited study

but like with the tomatoes i feel you are unable to hold the idea in your head



EDIT "Um i posted it once" so your counting is bad along with your reading? need me to go and quote you spamming it?

 

[UncleBuck]

They are not. They are distinct, and your conflating them can no longer be termed ignorance, but malice. You''re persisting in being incorrect, so I must ask what's in it for you? cn

you should really take a look at what's in your processed food next time you go shopping. HFCS, soy lecithin, and others will come up almost without fail.

 

[Ninjabowler]

Heres a picture of the tumors removed from the rats on the debunked study incase any readers were wondering what the tumor looks like on the inside. You know theres a chance that the study may have been right. Its not like anyone lost their jobs for tampering, they just said it was inconclusive

 

[Ninjabowler]

you should really take a look at what's in your processed food next time you go shopping. HFCS, soy lecithin, and others will come up almost without fail.

Very true, reading lables is the best way to limit your GMO intake, thanks for looking out for public health Buck.

 

[ginjawarrior]

you should really take a look at what's in your processed food next time you go shopping. HFCS, soy lecithin, and others will come up almost without fail.

you should really look at what is being said to you and not try worming your way out of it by redefining the english language

 

[ginjawarrior]

Heres a picture of the tumors removed from the rats on the debunked study incase any readers were wondering what the tumor looks like on the inside. You know theres a chance that the study may have been right. Its not like anyone lost their jobs for tampering, they just said it was inconclusive

pathetic scare tactics

 

[UncleBuck]

you should really look at what is being said to you and not try worming your way out of it by redefining the english language

i'm not responsible for the fact that pretty much any processed food is also GMO. sorry.

 

[ginjawarrior]

i'm not responsible for the fact that pretty much any processed food is also GMO. sorry.

your responsible for your use of the english language

thought you were educated to a reasonable level?

notice how you need to use weasel words to get it to fit?


"you should really take a look at what's in your processed food next time you go shopping. HFCS, soy lecithin, and others will come up almost without fail. "
"processed and GMO are basically one in the same nowadays. aren't you paying attention?"

 

[Ninjabowler]

pathetic scare tactics

I thought they were pretty good scare tactics and that study may have been right. We all know the multimillion dollar power of monsanto over science, media, and govenment. Just sayin

 

[ginjawarrior]

I thought they were pretty good scare tactics and that study may have been right. We all know the multimillion dollar power of monsanto over science, media, and govenment. Just sayin

if that study was right then why did they use such bad methods to get the results?

the science should stand on it own 2 feet with proper testing

 

[Krondizzel]

 

[ginjawarrior]

****words****

your way out of your depth on this one

go back to posting your cartoons and bunk studies

 

[Ninjabowler]

if that study was right then why did they use such bad methods to get the results?

the science should stand on it own 2 feet with proper testing

Did the tumors grow on their own lol, do you think that they just found tumors lying around and surgicaly implanted them into the rats?? No, they fed the rats monsanto products and they got huge tumors or died. Debunked or not that was the study and thats what happened to the rats. Put your head in the sand again. Youll be safe there.