Al Qeadea on the news.. Must watch!

SocataSmoker

Well-Known Member
Truth to it? Yeah, let's just forget about the Boeing 767's and 757's and the guys aboard those planes who crashed them whilst repeating prayers to Allah... It was not our government, if it was believe me... someone would've taken out Bush by now, it's not that hard to get a clear shot on him. Also, a building implosion, especially from one of the tallest buildings in the world... is going to go straight down, physics and gravity my friend.
 

We TaRdED

Well-Known Member
ur an idiot if u cant think for urself and let the government tell u everything , the towers came straight down looked like controlled demolition
watch this, and the funny thing is the binladen and the bush family are friends
YouTube - 9/11 Zionist Job
Thanks for bringing some truth along with your post! The reason why I started this post is because there are still many people that believe 911 was not an inside job. Last time I checked it was over 1/3 of the population believes 911 was an inside job, the other 2/3 of the population are most likely sheeple that are spoon fed all their news via the main stream media.

I do not know who was exactly behind 911. I don't know if it was a Zionist job or not, but I'm sure the people that are reaping the most profits from 911 were more than likely involved. For example, Larry Silverstein-the owner of the WTC complex that received eight billion (I'm not sure the exact amounts here) dollars in insurace money after only investing ~100million dollars when he leased the building less than a year before 911.

:peace:
 

arabmobster

Well-Known Member
theres no way of taking out bush , dont u think they would of took him out the first time when they realized he rigged the elections, maybe arabs did crash the planes into the buildings, but theres no way that the government had no prior knowledge of that , so they let it happen and they set it up to make it bigger, and the ppl that that where blamed for doing it where already dead from the isreal arab war of 20 years prior, something fishy bout the whole incident and they only put 60 k in to investigating such a tragic thing u think they would put a little more money and initative , god damit they spent more money on clinton with his affair 600k
 

SocataSmoker

Well-Known Member
No way of taking out Bush? Haha! I saw him a few days ago on an airport tarmac getting into his little whirlybird. It would've been a 200 yard shot but that's easy as cake! I know who was behind the attack, the people that claimed responsibility for it! I bet almost every civilian American had never heard of Al Qaeda before 9/11... and to find 10 people about to hijack an aircraft in the United States, pre 9/11, would be nil to impossible. Example, I never heard of a planned hijacking before 9/11, nor after.
 

Gryphonn

Well-Known Member
Thanks for bringing some truth along with your post! The reason why I started this post is because there are still many people that believe 911 was not an inside job. Last time I checked it was over 1/3 of the population believes 911 was an inside job, the other 2/3 of the population are most likely sheeple that are spoon fed all their news via the main stream media.

I do not know who was exactly behind 911. I don't know if it was a Zionist job or not, but I'm sure the people that are reaping the most profits from 911 were more than likely involved. For example, Larry Silverstein-the owner of the WTC complex that received eight billion (I'm not sure the exact amounts here) dollars in insurace money after only investing ~100million dollars when he leased the building less than a year before 911.

:peace:
So, you believe that the buildings were demolished ... as in a controlled demolition and that the planes were just a smoke screen yes?
Damn those pilots must have been good then. Crashing the planes in the exact same location as the explosives, but crashing in such a way as to not make the explosives go off straight away. The explosive must have been good too. The heat from thousands of pounds of fuel didn't affect them one iota!
The design of the towers lent themselves to collapse in the fashion that they did by the way the heat affected the internal structure. The blueprints for the building show that the design had its internal weak points that would cause an internal collapse as happened.
But no, everyone who knew about this conspiracy has kept their mouths shut too I guess. I have no trouble believing that US government inaction in the months before the 9/11 attacks was a contributing factor. But to suggest that they played an active role in these events is plainly laughable.
I certainly don't trust corporate greed or governments with obvious agendas, but please, get real here. From what I've read in the 'underground' press, even al qaeda didn't expect the buildings to collapse. They were as surprised as anyone.
Next you'll be telling me man didn't land on the moon We :mrgreen:.

Oh, arabmobster. The Bush and bin Laden families have a business relationship. The bin Laden family and their associates in Saudi Arabia have some 4 trillion dollars invested in the States. If the US govt pisses them off, they could send the US completely bankrupt. This is why Osama bin Laden will never be 'caught'. Osama is the black sheep of the family, but will be protected anyway. Not finding him is also a very good reason to maintain occupation of Afghanistan. If he is caught, the US forces have no reason to stay there.
 

Gryphonn

Well-Known Member
theres no way of taking out bush , dont u think they would of took him out the first time when they realized he rigged the elections, maybe arabs did crash the planes into the buildings, but theres no way that the government had no prior knowledge of that , so they let it happen and they set it up to make it bigger,
So, the pilots had their agenda and the govt let it happen and made it bigger. What? By planting explosives in the building prior to the aircraft hitting them? Damn that's an amazing coincidence that those planews hit in the exact same spot as the explosives were planted, and damned lucky that the explosive didn't detonate immediately after the planes hit yeah?

and the ppl that that where blamed for doing it where already dead from the isreal arab war of 20 years prior, something fishy bout the whole incident and they only put 60 k in to investigating such a tragic thing u think they would put a little more money and initative , god damit they spent more money on clinton with his affair 600k
Where are you getting your figures from? $60,000? C'mon arabmobster, surely you don't believe that only 60K was spent investigating the events of 9/11? If you do, I've got some wikkid Royal Nepalese hash here I'd like to sell you cheap.
 

arabmobster

Well-Known Member
if u look at some pictures theres ppl that are standing couple floors above the plane an hour later after it crashed so dont tell me the fuel from the plane brought the building down, meridian plaza in phildelphia burnt for 19 hour yet never collapsed, while the south tower came straight down less then an hour and most the jet fuel was goin in the intial fireball. , and plz tell me y building 7, 2 blocks away from the scene came down

YouTube - 9/11 Zionist Job
 

arabmobster

Well-Known Member
previously quoted by gryphonn
So, the pilots had their agenda and the govt let it happen and made it bigger. What? By planting explosives in the building prior to the aircraft hitting them? Damn that's an amazing coincidence that those planews hit in the exact same spot as the explosives were planted, and damned lucky that the explosive didn't detonate immediately after the planes hit yeah?


yea they new it was guna happen norad intercepted hijacked planes 67 times before sept 11 but on that day how come 4 planes got through
 
Last edited:

We TaRdED

Well-Known Member
It was not our government, if it was believe me... someone would've taken out Bush by now, it's not that hard to get a clear shot on him. .
I'm sure you know how many people hate Bush and would like to see him dead right? I'm talking about Americans too. So my question is how come someone hasn't taken him out with 70+% of the American population not giving him approval. Seven out of ten Americans Don't like Bush and his cronies.


.
 

arabmobster

Well-Known Member
coincidence i think not , it is true there not a biased news station, norad let it happen so basically bush let it happen

all the news stations in america are owned by zionist's so everything is twisted dont believe anything they say ur better of getting ur news online
 

We TaRdED

Well-Known Member
Next you'll be telling me man didn't land on the moon We :mrgreen:.
Hahaha, you know I brought up some good points though. I was just playing devils advocate for that because I could honestly care less what took place back then. But, do I think that we landed on the moon.??... I honestly can't give you an answer that is ascertain. If anyone is interested check out https://www.rollitup.org/toke-n-talk/73540-did-we-actually-land-moon.html, I personally think its fun. You liked it too Gryphonn.:mrgreen:


:peace:
 
Last edited:

arabmobster

Well-Known Member
hahaha well i dont think they landed on the moon when they said they did , they where probably trying to prove there better then the soviets cus of the cold war. y was the flag moving there no atmosphere on the moon , and y there 2 relfections on the rock looks like 2 light sources

but they probably did land recently
 

We TaRdED

Well-Known Member
all the news stations in america are owned by zionist's so everything is twisted dont believe anything they say ur better of getting ur news online
In your opinion, what do you think a 'Zionist' is? Are they the NWO(new world order) plotters, like the Bilderburg group(YouTube - Bildeberg Group , I haven't watched this yet, but its long enough, lol) or something? And what motives did the Zionists have in order to do 911.

This is what I believe happened:

A bunch of the richest and powerful leaders came together and tried to come up with a plot that would send us into war so all of these Cuntz could profiteer off the war in Iraq. Larry Silverstein(the owner of the WTC comples) got his money from the insurace companies.

For anyone that doesn't know, Wat = Lots of money for the contractors. War means that they can exploit the tax payers dollars for "defense" purposes. You guys have to watch this one YouTube - US Troops in Iraq talk about Halliburton & KBR


.
 

arabmobster

Well-Known Member
well the thing is if u know midde east history u would understand where this would fit in, as soon as they went into iraq several months later pipelines where layed out to isreal , know isreal has oil lines that makes them 65 billion a year ,
during the sudam regime he didnt allow it and no countries in the reigion allowed them there own oil because the opression of palestinians from isreals,
the isreals where tying to get these oil lines since ww2 but they knew that if they layed the pipelines england would get angry so they forgot the idea for a bit

bush said all the oil was for iraqi purposes but dont seem that way

i recomnd this video if ur into the new world order stuff end game - Google Video=

now that oil gives isreal huge leverage in the area no dependance on arab oil and no dependance on america they have their own income
 

We TaRdED

Well-Known Member
hahaha well i dont think they landed on the moon when they said they did , they where probably trying to prove there better then the soviets cus of the cold war. y was the flag moving there no atmosphere on the moon , and y there 2 relfections on the rock looks like 2 light sources

but they probably did land recently
There is something that is called the Van Allen radiation belt( Van Allen radiation belt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia )that wraps around the earth because of magnetic waves, and acts like a filter to block out harmful radiation that would give us serious radiation poisoning- if it didn't kill us.

I heard that in order to block out this radiation from penetrating the space ship would have to have 6ft of lead around the space ship in order to filter out the radiation(I'm not sure how true this statement is though). This Van Allen radiation belt is some thousand miles above the earths surface and normal space missions stay inside the radiation belts because they don't want to get radiation and their electronics to fry.

Impact on space travel

Solar cells, integrated circuits, and sensors can be damaged by radiation. In 1962, the Van Allen belts were temporarily amplified by a high-altitude nuclear explosion (the Starfish Prime test) and several satellites ceased operation. Geomagnetic storms occasionally damage electronic components on spacecraft. Miniaturization and digitization of electronics and logic circuits have made satellites more vulnerable to radiation, as incoming ions may be as large as the circuit's OpenDNS. Electronics on satellites must be hardened against radiation to operate reliably. The Hubble Space Telescope, among other satellites, often has its sensors turned off when passing through regions of intense radiation.
During Project Apollo, astronauts traveled through the Van Allen belts on both the outbound and return trips to the moon. The crews spent only limited time in transit in the region, and consequently the radiation exposure was limited. The Apollo 14 crew recorded the highest Van Allen belt exposures during their February 1971 mission, but the crew's short-term exposure was still within acceptable levels. Future manned missions beyond earth orbit must also transit the Van Allen belts, but these missions will be shielded and hardened for much longer-duration exposure to cosmic rays and solar wind.


Anyways, lets get back to 911, shall we? :mrgreen:



:peace:
 
Last edited:
Top