How can Anarchocapitalism break monopolies?

[Dr Kynes]

Cool strawman bro, tell me more about how republican and libertarian mean the same thing.

You are still ridiculing something you have no knowledge of, where as I know more about anarcho-capitalism than you do.

nobody but you is arguing that absurd statement but you, and of course you use creative redefinition of terms muddy the waters.

The Republican Party membership includes a large number of libertarians, since libertarian beliefs simply stress liberty of the individual over the desires of the state.

The Republican Party membership also includes a great many republicans, who believe a representative form with sovereign states and distinct tiered hierarchy of client-ship is essential. thats what is provided by our constitution. Since you obviously have no idea what republicanism is about, i shall sum up. republicanism is a system whereby the federal government is a clubhouse for the STATES to come together and argue how the STATES shall work together in a union, this is directly contrary to what we have now, which is a federalist system where the states are thralls and the people are chattel. during the continental congress the federalists and the republicans argued extensively the republicans won, and the constitution was drafted giving us a representative republic instead of a monolithic nationstate. the federalist, being assholes, have been trying to erode republicanism ever since. you may be interested to note (but probably not since youre stupid) this all took place more than 80 years before there was a political party called The Republicans.

Both republicanism and libertarianism are quite prevalent in the Republican Party, and they are not mutually exclusive.

 

[abandonconflict]

Both republicanism and libertarianism are quite prevalent in the Republican Party, and they are not mutually exclusive.

There are no libertarians in the GOP. There are only republicans who call themselves libertarians.

 

[Dr Kynes]

I thought you already had a thread to ridicule my philosophy. You must have given up when it became obvious you don't know shit about it.

NOBODY knows shit about it, since it is either an elaborate fiction or a closely guarded secret.

all anybody on your side, including chomsky will say about "Libertarian Socialism" is "it's not an oxymoron." everything else is left to the fevered imaginations of every emo kid and first year poli-sci major to decide on their own.

your "philosophy" is a fiction, created to make you feel special. nobody understands what your special snowflake "philosophy" means because it means nothing! it has no logical framework, no method for examination of epistemology, no ethics, no over-riding theme, and no boundaries.

"Libertarian Socialism" is not a philosophy it's a tantrum.

stick with posting other peoples words and pictures with other people's words on them. it's really all you got.

 

[Dr Kynes]

There are no libertarians in the GOP. There are only republicans who call themselves libertarians.

only if YOU get to decide what liberty and libertarianism is, and you dont have the chops for that.

you cant even explain your own views, dont even attempt to describe somebody else's

 

[abandonconflict]

NOBODY knows shit about it, since it is either an elaborate fiction or a closely guarded secret.

all anybody on your side, including chomsky will say about "Libertarian Socialism" is "it's not an oxymoron."

History does not attest to your assertion.

The oxymoron is anarcho-capitalism.

 

[Harrekin]

History does not attest to your assertion.

The oxymoron is anarcho-capitalism.

 

[Dr Kynes]

History does not attest to your assertion.

The oxymoron is anarcho-capitalism.

History is silent on "Libertarian Socialism" since you cannot explain it, or give a single example of it's implementation.

for all anyone knows, "Libertarian Socialism" may just be your private super secret code for anything from Egalitarian Tribalism, to Hereditary Monarchy.

since you have a proven track record of creatively re-defining every phrase to suit your narrative nobody is gonna listen to your slogans or image macros. your words mean nothing, so your posts are unconvincing.

and again, YOU are the only one using the bullshit phrase "anarcho capitalism".

EVERY political or economic theory is inconsistent with anarchy. anarchy is the complet lack of social structure and social order. it is social CHAOS.

Anarchy lasts only until a strongman claims the title of king, emperor, el presidente for life, or caliph. after that, it's straight to dictatorship and the police state as the new El Presidente eliminates the challenges to his authority and disarms his new subjects.

you know nothing, and lack the ability to debate your claimed ideals. you cant or wont even explain your claimed ideals.

keep your shabby little Secret Philosophy. your imprecations fail to injure every political and economic theory you attempt to defame.

you are ineffective.

 

[abandonconflict]

History is silent on "Libertarian Socialism" since you cannot explain it, or give a single example of it's implementation.

I didn't realize I was your teacher.

 

[Harrekin]

I didn't realize I was your teacher.

Yeah, you don't seem to realise much.

 

[abandonconflict]

only if YOU get to decide what liberty and libertarianism is, and you dont have the chops for that.

you cant even explain your own views, dont even attempt to describe somebody else's

I read about Anarchocapitalism/voluntaryism/feudalism before I criticized it. I know more about it than any of you.

Keep ridiculing something you know nothing about.

 

[Harrekin]

I read about Anarchocapitalism/voluntaryism/feudalism before I criticized it. I know more about it than any of you.

Keep ridiculing something you know nothing about.

If you don't explain it there is nothing to know about.

So the ridicule shall continue.

Tell me again how you convince everyone to hand over their property without Government.

 

[abandonconflict]

If you don't explain it there is nothing to know about.

So the ridicule shall continue.

Tell me again how you convince everyone to hand over their property without Government.

Tell me again what is free about a market where everything is sold by an owning class and everything is bought by the people who sell labor to them.

 

[abandonconflict]

 

[Dr Kynes]

I read about Anarchocapitalism/voluntaryism/feudalism before I criticized it. I know more about it than any of you.

Keep ridiculing something you know nothing about.

"anarchocapitalism" is a silly phrase that ONLY YOU employ. it is the essence of a strawman. you create a ridiculous label, lump everything you oppose under that false label and then hose the entire fabrication down with piss.

too bad its a rhetorical fallacy.

"volunatryism" is another one of those poli-sci phrases that really has no meaning for most of the world. outside of a poli-sci class that word is rarely used, it is a label for an entirely theoretical extremist idea, the kind of idea endorsed by rmaybe one or two radical anarchists and a couple of emo kids who dont want take out the garbage or wash the dishes because "they have like, principles and shit" volunatryism is an excuse for anti-social behavior, not a philosophy, not even a "political ideology"

and who besides YOU is advocating feudalism? thats just another strawman.

you are not nearly asd clever as you believe. any asshole can shout and cry that X is bad, Y is useless, and Z is worse than nazisim, but if you dont put forth your own position, youre just an asshole throwing a temper tantrum.

put up or shut up.

 

[Dr Kynes]

more Deep Thoughts froim a men's room wall.

you are a useless jingoist.

 

[abandonconflict]

more Deep Thoughts froim a men's room wall.

you are a useless jingoist.

I'm a Jingoist because I won't tell you what libertarian socialism means?

 

[Dr Kynes]

I'm a Jingoist because I won't tell you what libertarian socialism means?

no, you are a jingoist for posting slogans, quotes, memes and image macros with neither context nor commentary. your exhortations revert to a simple "because i said so" appeal to authority, but you lack any authority to which you might appeal, and thus your failure is complete.

your unwillingness (and apparent inability) to explain what you believe "Libertarian Socialism" means is merely compounded by your proffering of a contradictory and ridiculous wikipage, and videos of noam chomsky saying "it's not an oxymoron" over and over.

i have searched diligently, and have found no coherent exposition on the nature and form of "Libertarian Socialism" save numerous blog entries and essays which in the final analysis reveal NOTHING about the nature of this proclaimed "philosophy" except that apparently (and every author agrees on this point) "it's not an oxymoron"

unfortunately every author immediately after asserting that "Libertarian Socialism" is "not an oxymoron" jumps in with both feet and begins spouting contradictory claims, aims and goals using nothing more than re-definition of the state, nationalization, marxism, and collectivization as fig leafs to disguise what is obviously simply old fashioned Marxist Socialism in a new party dress.

the unwillingness to stand up for your own professed philosophy, and your inability to explain what you claim it is, why you think it is good, and why seeds are a "Means of Production" marks you as an ignorant dilettante.

 

[abandonconflict]

Marxist Socialism

TL;DR

noticed bold though, so yay, I'm a Marxist again...

 

[Harrekin]

Tell me again what is free about a market where everything is sold by an owning class and everything is bought by the people who sell labor to them.

Labour/products/money are traded freely in a free market, believe it or not.

How else would people "get" anything?

Example; person decides to be a farmer, they sell the product they "made" for money, then exchange the cash for other products/services they desire or save their money.

Another person has nothing but their labour to trade, they help produce a product/provide a service and are paid, they then exchange the money for other products/services or save it.

Anyone can start a business and become the "producer" with enough graft and some savings, some people choose to work for someone else and some then even bitch that they arnt in their boss' position (ie the person who had the foresight to start their own business, thus providing them employment).

I say fuck lazy, non-driven, moany people like that and thus conversely, fuck people like you, you lazy bitch.

Work for your money or start a business, the choice is ENTIRELY yours and stop crying that other people have more than you.

 

[abandonconflict]

Another person has nothing but their labour to trade

I bet he regrets not inheriting more coal.

So if nobody buys his labor, he starves?