Rawn Pawl is not a libertarian. He is a fascist vanguard.

Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan said:
Doc,

You didn't make any comments on Salo. That movie is a classic.

Again no cheating if you haven't seen it. I want a Youtube of that expression. 2 girls, one cup, ain't got shit on Salo.

Ps,

I don't believe you've seen either The Cave, or The Ruins.
Click to expand...
i saw the cave, it wasnt so bad, by comparison to many other films. in fact i kinda liked The Cave.

i have not seen the ruins, or 120 days of sodom, but Beyond the Black Rainbow is so awful, i couldnt believe what i was seeing.

im really not that into homo-erotic thrillers, or sadism, that shit makes me go a big rubbery one, i prefer science fiction, mystery, action and comedies.

observe if you dare the classic stoner beach movie

"Surf 2, The End Of The Trilogy" watch it while youre high. follow it up with
"Deathstalker 2, Prince of Theives"

either of these sequels are sure to please any pothead.

Warning: Do Not Watch Deathstalker 1, 3, 4 or 5. they are absolute shit. and not even original shit, they are all cheap low budget ripoffs of Conan the Barbarian.

Deathstalker 2 is unique, in that it is a sequel without any connection to the previous or subsequent films in the franchise. and its as funny as 2 hours of nutshots, nad rattlers and groin impacts.
Surf 2 The End Of The Trilogy is unique in that there is neither a Surf 1 or a Surf 3. just Surf 2.
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
Fishshagy, all the Ron Paul slander is taken out of context, deliberately portrayed in a deceptive manner, etc... yes all of it, as an example you mentioned "Jim Crow Laws" thing that quote is not even taken out of context you just actually need to read the quote and not the hit pieces written on it. I am really not going to go over it again, there are several 100+ page threads, refer to The Truth About Ron Paul Part 2
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
Fishshagy, all the Ron Paul slander is taken out of context, deliberately portrayed in a deceptive manner, etc... yes all of it, as an example you mentioned "Jim Crow Laws" thing that quote is not even taken out of context you just actually need to read the quote and not the hit pieces written on it. I am really not going to go over it again, there are several 100+ page threads, refer to The Truth About Ron Paul Part 2
Click to expand...
shut up. ron paul is a racist, because the ultra-lefties say so, and that means, by inheritance and genetics, rand pauls is also racist.

defending these two racists makes you a racists, mentioning their names without deliberate misspellings makes me a racists, and reading this makes YOU a racist,

AND YOU,

and you!

AND YOU TOO!!


 
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
Fishshagy, all the Ron Paul slander is taken out of context, deliberately portrayed in a deceptive manner, etc... yes all of it, as an example you mentioned "Jim Crow Laws" thing that quote is not even taken out of context you just actually need to read the quote and not the hit pieces written on it. I am really not going to go over it again, there are several 100+ page threads, refer to The Truth About Ron Paul Part 2
Click to expand...
I don't care that Ron Paul says he's not racist any more. Those papers were written by him and his racist friends. He just has you and all the other stoners fooled into thinking he is going to legalize weed and acts like he's all about rLOVEution. The only GOOD thing I can see coming out of a Ron Paul presidency is smaller government and he would probably let Texas (and the states that followed) leave the union peacefully.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
as an example you mentioned "Jim Crow Laws" thing that quote is not even taken out of context you just actually need to read the quote and not the hit pieces written on it.
Click to expand...
It isn't taken out of context, he said he wouldn't vote against getting rid of the Jim Crow laws. He said it would infringe upon the personal liberties of citizens. He would leave it to states to decide on segregation.

How he supports his position is as racist as his position. He thinks racial segregation is more conducive toward liberty than a lack thereof.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
It isn't taken out of context, he said he wouldn't vote against getting rid of the Jim Crow laws. He said it would infringe upon the personal liberties of citizens. He would leave it to states to decide on segregation.

How he supports his position is as racist as his position. He thinks racial segregation is more conducive toward liberty than a lack thereof.
Click to expand...
Ron Paul may be a senile and batshit nuts, but he never said any such thing you communist neo-fascist boob.

The federal government has no authority when it comes to regulating business. Anything not spelled out by the constitution is up to the states. If you don't like that, the constitution tells you how to fix it. It's not big brother's job.

Just because it may be racist, doesn't mean martial law can be declared.

The following are what the federal government may do: regulate interstate commerce iff a conflict arises, otherwise it can only use the powers in the Constitution. For everything else, it can go fuck itself.

Just because you're a butthurt communist neo-fascist doesn't make anything you said true.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
If a small powerful group of people wanted to control all of the resources of the nation and have everyone else just be a labor force, what would they call themselves?

Seems like I hate capitalism for the same reason you hate socialism.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
deprave said:
I have graphed out the political spectrum as "Libertarian socialist" view it below:

View attachment 2533996
Click to expand...
Your graph is misleading in more ways than you intended.

Here is a correct political grid.

If you see one that has libertarian as synonymous with anarchism it is incorrect. For that matter I was incorrect in saying that capitalism is incompatible with libertarianism. Libertarian capitalism is not anarchistic however. Rawn Pawl is still a fascist vanguard though, because he speaks up a big game (basically voluntaryism) yet he is a racist who worships the constitution as holy writ. Since the constitution is the basis of state, supporting the document is inherently statist. If one is statist and capitalist, they are what you call corporatist but what is correctly called fascist.

Fascist is the entire upper right quadrant.
Anarchist is the bottom left quadrant.
Voluntaryist is the bottom right quadrant.
Leninism is the top left quadrant.

What Leninism and fascism have in common is the necessity for a vanguard. This implies that people must be deceived in order to accept gov't which implies that liberty is organic and natural.

On this grid, left and right can be correctly labeled also as socialist and capitalist. This is the correct political grid. Other grids will have mislabeled axis or diagonal axis.

It is also completely incorrect to say that voluntaryism is anarchism. Anarchocapitalism is an oxymoron. Libertarian socialism is anarchism.
 
nontheist

nontheist

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:


Ironic that a racist troll would like your suggestion that a thread get locked because of anarchist content.
Click to expand...

First of all please provide proof I have ever said anything racist, we both know you're talking out of your ass. Second anarchist are fucking loons, people are not falling over themselves to establish a system where people with the most firepower has the power. I am sure you like the rebel drug lord power of a narcostate but others, not so much. The fact that the only people that even tolerate your rambling are social communist speaks for itself, wouldn't you say?
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
^^^^^^
[h=1]“A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.”~Bertrand Russel[/h]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top